ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN WARTIME UKRAINE: BUSINESS ADOPTION, INVESTMENT INTENTIONS, AND LABOUR-MARKET EXPECTATIONS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This study examines the factors that determine whether firms adopt AI and are ready to invest, and explores labour-market and employment-related expectations in wartime Ukraine. Methodology. The study is based on original survey data collected in a frontline region of Ukraine during wartime. The sample comprises 300 respondents from various socio-economic backgrounds. The empirical analysis uses descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests and ordinal and binary logistic regression models. The study also presents an original composite AI-readiness index (ranging from 0 to 100) which assesses preparedness for AI adoption by integrating organisational, behavioural and investment-related dimensions. All statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software. Results. The findings suggest that organisational readiness plays a key role in determining current AI adoption and firms’ willingness to invest in AI. Expected efficiency gains from AI greatly increase investment intentions, while prior AI adoption has a cumulative effect on further investment readiness. Furthermore, adaptive capacity is positively associated with more favourable perceptions of AI in wartime. The fear of losing one's job to AI is significantly higher among employees engaged in routine-intensive tasks, but this effect is significantly reduced by higher education, which confirms the moderating role of human capital. Perceived AI-driven efficiency gains vary considerably across social groups, with citizens being more optimistic than business representatives and workers. The proposed AI-readiness index reveals significant differences in AI readiness among firms of different sizes, sectors, and geographic scopes. Practical implications. The results are relevant to business decision-making and economic policy in wartime. The findings show that the adoption of artificial intelligence in business is primarily determined by organisational capacity, institutional support and adaptive capability rather than technological accessibility alone. For firms, this highlights the importance of taking a systemic approach to the use of artificial intelligence in strategic planning. In frontline regions, human capital policy—including digital education, reskilling and regional co-operation between enterprises and educational institutions—is particularly relevant, as it can support economic adaptation and mitigate employment-related risks. Value/Originality. This article makes a contribution to the body of research on the adoption of artificial intelligence and employment-related perceptions under wartime conditions. Unlike previous empirical studies, which were conducted in contexts of institutional stability and predictable market environments, this study examines decision-making related to artificial intelligence in a border region of Ukraine that is close to active hostilities. Here, economic expectations, investment behaviour and perceptions of employment risks are all shaped by ongoing security threats. The study's originality lies in its integration of firm-level determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption with individual-level economic expectations and employment-related responses. By incorporating organisational readiness, investment intentions and labour-market perceptions into a single analytical framework, the article broadens the scope of existing AI adoption approaches by considering organisational, economic and socio-behavioural factors in a wartime context.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
artificial intelligence, AI adoption, AI readiness, investment intentions, labour-market expectations, employment risk perceptions
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work (NBER Working Paper No. 24196). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24196
Alsheibani, S., Cheung, Y., & Messom, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence adoption: AI-readiness at firm-level. In M. Tanabu, & D. Senoo (Eds.), Proceedings of PACIS2018 : Pacific Asia Conference in Information Systems (PACIS) Article 37 Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/37/
Androshchuk, G. O. (2021). Degree of trust in artificial intelligence: Analysis of research results. Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 3. 200-206. https://ndipzir.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/Conf_20.09.21/3.pdf
Baabdullah, A., Alalwan, A., Slade, E., Raman, R., & Khatatneh, K. (2021). SMEs and artificial intelligence (AI): Antecedents and consequences of AI-based B2B practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.09.003
Benbya, Hind; Davenport, Thomas H.; and Pachidi, Stella (2020) "Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: Current State and Future Opportunities," MIS Quarterly Executive: 19 (4). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741983
Bharadiya, J. P., Thomas, R. K., & Ahmed, F. (2023). Rise of artificial intelligence in business and industry. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 25(3), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.9734/JERR/2023/v25i3893
Borges A.F., Laurindo F.J., Spínola M.M., Gonçalves R.F., Mattos C.A. The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 57 (2020), Article 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225
Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2023). What does the public think about artificial intelligence? – A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Frontiers in Computer Sciences, 5, Article 1113903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8062
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020). The strategic impacts of Intelligent Automation for knowledge and service work: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29, 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600
Corea, F., Fossa, F., Loreggia, A., Quintarelli, S., & Sapienza, S. (2022). A principle-based approach to AI: The case for European Union and Italy. AI & SOCIETY, 38, 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01453-8
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116. https://bit.ly/3NYQSgI
Dubyna, M., Popelo, O., & Shvets, M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in the development of the insurance market. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-329-341
European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Flavián, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D. and Casaló, L.V. (2022), "Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services – the effect of technology readiness and awareness", Journal of Service Management, 33 (2), 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-10-2020-0378
Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J. E., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D. J., Feldman, M., Groh, M., Lobo, J., Moro, E., Wang, D., Youn, H., & Rahwan, I. (2019). Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(14), 6531-6539. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900949116
Gao, F., Peng, B., Zhao, Y., & Wei, G. (2026). Tech for Good: The employment effects of policy-driven artificial intelligence development. International Review of Economics & Finance, 105, (104807), (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104807
Georgieff, A., & Hyee, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence and employment: New cross-country evidence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 832736. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.832736
Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00754
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
Halaburda, N., Radchenia, N., & Pahlevanzade, A. (2025). State regulation of the use of artificial intelligence: Civil law and economic and legal aspects. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(4), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-4-294-303
Humlum, A. (2022). Robot adoption and labor market dynamics. Berlin, Germany: Rockwool Foundation Research Unit. https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/humlumjmp_111419.pdf
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M. & Wyrtki, K. Ready or Not, AI Comes – An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors. Bus Inf Syst Eng 63, 5–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7
The Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine"On Approval of the Concept for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine" of December 2, 2020, No. 1556-p. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80
The Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On Approval of the Action Plan for the Implementation of the Concept for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine for 2025–2026" of May 9, 2025, No. 457-p. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/457-2025-%D1%80#Text
Kolomiyets, G., Korol, V., & Bilіanskiy D. (2025). Digital ecosystems as a driver of business landscape transformation in the modern economy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-115-120
Krakowski, S., Luger, J., & Raisch, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Sources of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 44(6), 1425-1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3387
Kubatko, O. V., Ozims, S. Ch., & Voronenko, V. I. (2024). Influence of artificial intelligence on business decision-making. Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, (1 (103), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.32782/mer.2024.103.03
Kubatko, O. V., Ozims, S. Ch., Voronenko, V. I., & Konovalenko, I. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence for business efficiency and civil defence fostering. Economic Space, (190), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/190-27
Lane, M. and A. Saint-Martin (2021), “The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market: What do we know so far?”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 256, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/7c895724-en
Lichtenthaler, U. (2019). An intelligence-based view of firm performance: profiting from artificial intelligence. Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_007.001_0002
Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., ... & Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. McKinsey Global Institute, 150(1), 1-148. https://bit.ly/46dmMfG
Martins, M. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in business strategy: How AI-driven analytics is reshaping decision making. International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology, 7(1), 63–71. https://ijhit.info/index.php/ijhit/article/view/113
Oliinyk O. (2025). Legal regulation of artificial intelligence in Ukraine: challenges and prospects. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, (6). https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.6.04
Peretz-Andersson, E., Tabares, S., Mikalef, P., & Parida, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence implementation in manufacturing SMEs: A resource orchestration approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102781
Portocarrero Ramos, H. C., Cruz Caro, O., Sánchez Bardales, E., Quiñones Huatangari, L., Campos Trigoso, J. A., Maicelo Guevara, J. L., & Chávez Santos, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence skills and their impact on the employability of university graduates. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1629320. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1629320
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P., & Reeves, M. (2017, September). Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action. MIT Sloan Management Review & Boston Consulting Group. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/reshaping-business-with-artificial-intelligence/
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Khodabandeh, S., Iyer, S., & Das, A. (2025, November). The emerging agentic enterprise: How leaders must navigate a new age of AI. MIT Sloan Management Review & Boston Consulting Group. https://doi.org/10.63383/jAXE2583
Reiter, L., Böhm, R., & Fuchs, C. (2026). Country-level differences in socio-economic development and cultural dimensions are associated with workers’ economic expectations of AI: Evidence from 31 countries. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 21, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100905
Robles, Р., & Mallinson, D. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence technology, public trust, and effective governance. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12555
Saba, C. S., & Ngepah, N. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on employment and economic growth in BRICS: Does the moderating role of governance matter? Research in Globalization, 8, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100213
Sergun, I., Khaustova, Y. & Sverhun, M. (2025). AI-Driven Digital Transformation: Enhancing Business and Economic Sustainability Across Sectors. Digital Transformation and IT Implementation: Driving Sustainable Development Across Nations: Monograph, In Z. Zhyvko (Eds.), Scientific Center of Innovative Research. Estonia. 248 p. (pp. 61-84). https://doi.org/10.36690/DTIT61-84
Soni, N., Sharma, E. K., Singh, N., & Kapoor, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Business: From Research and Innovation to Market Deployment. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 2200-2210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.272
Tarasenko, S., Karintseva, O., Duranowski, W., Bilovol, A., & Voronenko, V. (2024). Awareness and readiness to use artificial intelligence by the adult population of Ukraine: Survey results. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.01
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications. volume 11, 233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
Vu, H. T., & Lim, J. (2022). Effects of country and individual factors on public acceptance of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies: a multilevel SEM analysis of 28-country survey data. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(7), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1884288
Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Wamba, S. F., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., & Wanko, C. E. T. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0411
Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1-37. DOI: 10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
Yeh, S.-C., Wu, A.-W., Yu, H.-C., Wu, H. C., Kuo, Y.-P., & Chen, P.-X. (2021). Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Its Connections to the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13(16), 9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169165
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.