FRANCHISING MODEL OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC LIBRARIES’ SERVICES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jul 25, 2018

  Maksym Sitnicki

Abstract

The aim of the article is the formation of an innovative model for the commercialization of the services of scientific libraries of research universities in order to increase their financial autonomy. The methodology of the research is based on the use of methods: scientific generalization, systematization, comparison, modelling. The object of research is the activity of scientific libraries of research universities, which strive to vary in the current conditions of rapid technological development. The research results consist of the systematization of the main and secondary functions of scientific libraries of research universities. A new economic category of “digital franchising” has been proposed and characterized as a model of cooperation between the franchisor and the franchisee when the rights to use and represent the company of the franchisor in the intercontinental digital space are transferred. The franchisee has the right to use the company name, services, goods, technological processes, and software of the franchisor to create its own digital network of sub-franchisees and digital products on the basis of the conditions specified in the contract. Such kind of franchising will allow settling relations in a digital cyberspace, promptly developing and getting new, yet not completely studied forms. Comparison of traditional and digital models of franchising has allowed to show differences on ten basic criteria: costs for building a network; speed of interaction; level of managerial flexibility; updating of the system; the possibility of expanding the network; financial control; brand management; rate of return; the speed of information about new services; need for operational management. The revealed discrepancies are mainly characterized by different time frames for implementing managerial decisions and excellent approaches to the formation and use of the necessary financial and organizational resources. The author has developed an innovative franchise model, which makes it possible to effectively commercialize the services of scientific libraries. This model is based on the use of franchising by building a broad network of digital services. The peculiarity of digital franchising is revealed, which consists in the essential optimization of expenses for organizing the activities of scientific libraries, in comparison with the traditional model, and speeding up the pace and quality of service. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in new opportunities for pushing a new wave of development of methods for commercializing the services of scientific libraries of research universities and their dissemination at the global level. Using the developed innovative franchise model will be useful for theorists and practitioners engaged in the development of strategies for the development of research universities and their scientific libraries. The main conclusion of the research is that the introduction of a developed marketing tool by talented managers with an entrepreneurial type of thinking will become a source of financial autonomy for scientific libraries of research universities they manage. Digital expansion in a strategic perspective will absorb all the major information flows that affect the development of the world. Libraries of research universities, as key centres for aggregation and translation of scientific information and knowledge, should be ready for such scenario and already experiment with new tools for the future, which is digital franchising.

How to Cite

Sitnicki, M. (2018). FRANCHISING MODEL OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC LIBRARIES’ SERVICES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-214-221
Article views: 521 | PDF Downloads: 270

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

digital franchising, franchising model, scientific libraries, research universities, commercialization of services

References

Baldwin, J., Yan, B.: Market Expansion and Productivity Growth: Do New Domestic Markets Matter as Much as New International Markets? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21, 469-491 (2012). DOI:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00330.x

Basamygina, I.N., Apanasenko, A.A.: Marketing kak tekhnologiya upravleniya sovremennoy bibliotekoy: nauchnoprakticheskoe posobie [Marketing as a technology management modern library: a scientific and practical guide], Moscow: Litera, 128 (2009). (in Russian)

Beere, R.: The Role of Franchising on Industry Evolution: Assessing the Emergence of Franchising and its Impact on Structural Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 224 (2017). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49064-9

Boulay, J., Caemmerer, B., Evanschitzky, H., Duniach, K.: Growth, Uniformity, Local Responsiveness, and System-Wide Adaptation in Multiunit Franchising. Journal of Small Business Management, 54 (4), 1193-1205 (2016). DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12239

Calderon-Monge, E., Pastor-Sanz, I., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.: Franchising in Europe: Exploring the Case of Spain with Self-organizing Time Maps. Psychology & Marketing, 33 (7), 559-572 (2016). DOI:10.1002/mar.20897

Dada, O., Jack, S., George, M.: University-Business Engagement Franchising and Geographic Distance: A Case Study of a Business Leadership Programme. Regional Studies, 50 (7), 1217-1231 (2016). DOI:10.1080/00343404.2014.995614

Daley, J.: The Riskiest People in Franchising. Entrepreneur, 45 (3), 74-79 (2017).

Dant, R.P., Grünhagen, M., Windsperger, J.: Franchising Research Frontiers for the Twenty-First Century. Journal Of Retailing, 253-268 (2011). DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08.002

Fernando Varotto, L., Aureliano-Silva, L.: Evolution in franchising: Trends and new perspectives. Internext: Revista Electrônica De Negócios Internacionais Da ESPM, 12 (3), 31-42 (2017). DOI:10.18568/1980-4865.12331-42

Franchise Group. Available at https://franchisegroup.com.ua/about-company/franchising (2017), last accessed 2018/02/23.

Ghantous, N., Das, S.S., Chameroy, F.: Governance capabilities and relationship performance in international franchising. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 40, 19-30 (2018). DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.022

Henricks, M.: Franchising and Business Growth Go Hand-in-Hand. Inc, 38 (7), 188 (2016).

Iliasa, A. Chancen und Risiken des Franchisings: Theoretische Grundlagen und Praxisbezug. Diplomica Verlag (2013).

Jeitschko T.D, Jung Y, Kim J.: Bundling and joint marketing by rival firms. J Econ Manage Strat, 26, 571-589 (2017). DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12199

Johnson, D. Media Franchising : Creative License and Collaboration in the Culture Industries. New York: NYU Press (2013).

Karaduman, İ., Arici, G.: Evaluation of the Effects of Franchising Associations on Franchising Decisions of Companies in Turkey. Istanbul Aydin Üniversitesi Dergisi, 8 (32), 107-126 (2016).

Lazorenko, T., Frolova, A.: Development of franchising in the world and in Ukraine. Socio-Economic Problems & The State, 17 (2), 199-207 (2017). (in Ukrainian)

Leusing, B.: Franchising: An Adequate Business Model for the "Proactive University? A Public-Private Perspective on German He. Sinéctica, 36, 1-11 (2011).

Mallapragada, G., Srinivasan, R.: Innovativeness as an Unintended Outcome of Franchising: Insights from Restaurant Chains. Decision Sciences, 48 (6), 1164-1197 (2017). DOI:10.1111/deci.12258

Neklessa, A. Franchayzing budushchogo [Franchising of the future]. Available at http://www.buybrand.ru/articles/11978/ (2016), last accessed 2018/02/23. (in Russian)

O’Neill, R: Franchising, Busidate, 25 (2017).

Perdreau, F., Chaudey, M., Chanut, O., Fadairo, M.: Contract duration and contractual learning: Evidence from franchising networks. Managerial & Decision Economics, 39 (2), 240-252 (2018). DOI:10.1002/mde.2899

Rosado-Serrano, A., Paul, J., Dikova, D.: International franchising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 85, 238-257 (2018). DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049

Scott, N.: Franchising: The Future of Your Career?. Director, 70 (10), (2017).

Sherman, A.J. Franchising & Licensing : Two Powerful Ways to Grow Your Business in Any Economy. New York: AMACOM (2011).

Sitnicki, M.: Determining the Priorities of the Development of EU Research Universities’ Based on the Analysis of Rating Indicators of the World-Class Universities. Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 8 (1), (2018a).

Sitnicki, M.W.: Franchajzyngh u sferi poslugh naukovykh bibliotek doslidnycjkykh universytetiv [Franchising in the service of research libraries of research universities]. Zabezpechennja stalogho rozvytku ekonomiky: problemy, mozhlyvosti, perspektyvy: materialy dopovidej Mizhnarodnoji naukovo-praktychnoji konferenciji. Uzhghorod: Vydavnychyj dim «Gheljvetyka», 188-190 (2018b). (in Ukrainian)

Sitnitskiy, M.: Franchising in culture. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 4 (145), 57-59 (2013). (in Ukrainian) DOI: 10.17721/1728-2667.2013/145-4/20

Sitnitskiy, M.: Strategic imperatives for the development of the scientific library of the research university. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 5 (194), 34-39 (2017). (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2017/194-5/5

Soni, B.K., Trivedi, J.: Franchising in India: A Study of the Relationship Between the Franchisor and the Franchisee. ASBM Journal of Management, 9 (1), 57-69 (2016).

Stanford, A.O.: Franchising Opportunities and Threats in Singapore. International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science, 9 (1), 116-127 (2016).