INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIES OF SYSTEM SECURITY OF TECHNOLOGICAL & INNOVATION SYSTEMS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Mar 22, 2019

  Vitaliy Omelyanenko

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to consider the main aspects of system security providing institutional concept within the technological & innovation systems research methodology development through institutional innovations. In this paper, we will consider how the new evolutionary institutional theory of economic systems in the context of the space-time approach can help in organizing strategic management of development path of the innovation system, increasing system security, and effectiveness of its activities through the balance of system structure. Methodology. The scientific novelty of the research and the solution of its tasks deals, first of all, with the application of the non-system approach, which allows one to consider the factors and results of functioning of such complex economic systems as innovation macro projects, innovation processes, institutional and informational environments, etc. within the framework of providing national security. Involvement on a systematic basis of spatiotemporal analysis allows us to consider in the interrelation processes the distribution of flows of innovation resources and functions, on the one hand, and the distribution in time of similar flows. To solve the tasks of research, the classical scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, logical generalization, analogies, comparative comparison, and grapho-analytical methods), and specific methods of high technologies economy and innovation management were used. Results. As a result of the study, the features of the systemic socio-economic patterns of the functioning of innovation system institutions and the mechanism of management of innovation development in the conditions of modern global technological transformations have been determined. In the future, this makes possible the substantiation of promising areas of state regulation (participation) aimed at activating innovation processes in the economy according to the priorities related to scientific and educational, cluster and network development, and the development of a set of models for the harmonization of the system of priorities of national security and sectoral priorities of innovation development. Using the gained knowledge in practice will help to improve the state of national security, resource saving, improve conditions, and increase labour productivity, as well as the transition to sustainable development of the national economy. Practical implications. Systemic coordination of innovation components of state programs, stimulation of innovation activity, involvement of financial strategies in the innovation economy, expansion of international cooperation and activation of demand for high-tech products, increasing the effectiveness of innovation development programs of companies, and launching of national projects have been proposed as the objectives of forming institutional innovations. The proposed institutional and technological design methodology provides for the selection of institutional tools and scaling of the most effective development tools. Value/originality. The proposed network mechanisms for systemic security ensuring provide the improvement of implementing innovative development programs for the largest companies with state participation; further development of priority technological platforms and innovation networks; harmonization of technological priorities and projects formed within the framework of technological platforms, with the tools of state strategies.

How to Cite

Omelyanenko, V. (2019). INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIES OF SYSTEM SECURITY OF TECHNOLOGICAL & INNOVATION SYSTEMS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-1-150-159
Article views: 632 | PDF Downloads: 271

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

system security, national security, national innovation system, technology, analytics, networks, institutions

References

A 21st century science, technology, and innovation strategy for America’s national security (2016). Committee on Homeland and National Security of the National Science and Technology Council.

Allen, D.W.E., Potts, J. (2016). How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 1035-1054. doi: 10.18352/ijc.644

Andersen, A. D., Andersen, P. D. (2014). Innovation system foresight. Technological forecasting and social change, 88, 276-286.

Bogatova, Е. V. (2009). Innovacii kak faktor ehkonomicheskoj dinamiki v teoriyah cikla i socialnoehkonomicheskih koncepciyah [Innovations as a factor of economic dynamics in cycle theories and socio-economic concepts]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena, 103, 41-47. (in Russian)

Doner, R. F. (2010). Explaining institutional innovation case studies from Latin America and East Asia. Social Science Research Council.

Egbetokun, A., Oluwadare, A. J., Ajao, B. F. et al. (2017). Innovation systems research: an agenda for developing countries. Journal of open innovation: technology, market and complexity, 3, 25. doi: 10.1186/s40852-017-0076-x

Golichenko, О. G. (2012). Osnovnye faktory razvitiya nacionalnoj innovacionnoj sistemy [The main factors of development of the national innovation system]. Innovatsii, 5(163), 3-18. (in Russian)

Hagel, J., Seely Brown, J. (2013). Institutional innovation. Part of a Deloitte series on innovation. Retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/topics/innovation/institutional-innovation.html

Harmon, J. D., Stevens, J. H., Swim, L. B. (1991). Finance, technology transfer and national security: a preliminary survey. Journal of technology transfer, 16(3), 38-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02371306

Hodgson, G. (2002). The evolution of institutions: an agenda for future theoretical research. Constitutional Political Economy, 13, 111-127.

Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A. (2004). Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind. Corp. Chang, 13, 815-849.

Kudrina, O., Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Research framework for system security of technological & innovation systems. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 248-254. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-248-254

Luksha, O., Pilnov, G., Tarasova, O. et al. (2006). Evropejskie seti podderzhki innovacionnoj deyatelnosti [European networks of innovation support]. Retrieved from: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/prom_i_agroprom/dep_prom/SiteAssets/Европейские%20сети.pdf (in Russian)

Mizjun, V. (2014). Innovacionnye formy i mekhanizmy gosudarstvennogo i municipalnogo upravleniya [Innovation forms and mechanisms of state and municipal government]. Retrieved from: https://www.cfin.ru/anticrisis/macroeconomics/government_program/state_municipal_management.shtml (in Russian)

Nelson, R., Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31, 265-272.

Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Analysis of conceptual aspects of institutional and technological design. Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2, no. 5(40), 31-36. doi: 10.15587/2312-8372.2018.128651

Piirainen, K. A., Dahl Andersen, A., Andersen, P. D. (2016). Foresight and the third mission of universities: the case for innovation system foresight. Foresight, 18(1), 24-40. doi: 10.1108/FS-04-2014-0026

Platonova, I. V. (2016). Formirovanie sbalansirovannoj innovacionnoj politiki predpriyatiya [Formation of a balanced innovation policy of the enterprise]. Problemy regionalnoj ehkonomiki, 20. Retrieved from: http://www.lerc.ru/?part=bulletin&art=20&page=20 (in Russian)

Porokhin, А. V., Porokhina, Е. V., Soina-Kutuscheva, Yu. N. et al. (2014). Ustojchivost kak opredelyayushchaya harakteristika sostoyaniya socialno-ehkonomicheskoj sistemy [Sustainability as a defining characteristic of the state of the socio-economic system]. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya, 12(4), 816-821. (in Russian)

Potts, J. (2016). The New Economics of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Institutions: Considerations for Australian Agriculture. 60th AARES Annual Conference, Canberra, ACT, 2-5 February 2016.

Potts, J. (2017). Governing the innovation commons. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1-23. doi: 10.1017/S1744137417000479

Prokopenko, O., Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Priority selection within national innovation strategy in global context. Economics and Business, 31(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1515/eb-2017-0014

Reichardt, K., Rogge, K. S., Negro, S. O. (2017). Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1217-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.280

Samosudov, М. V. (2008). Mekhanizmy upravleniya sistemnoj ustojchivostyu kompanii [System stability management mechanisms of the company]. Sovremennaya konkurenciya, 4(10), 50-62. (in Russian)

Saviotti, P. P. (2005). On the Co-Evolution of Technologies and Institutions. In: Weber M., Hemmelskamp J. (eds) Towards environmental innovation systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27298-4_2

Schot, J., Steinmueller, E. (2017). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) University of Sussex Working Paper, 28 November 2017.

Werle, R. (2011). Institutional analysis of technical innovation a review. SOI Discussion Paper 2011-04.