SHIPBUILDING OF SOUTHERN UKRAINE: FROM STATE MONOPOLY TO CLUSTER INTEGRATION
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to determine the prospects of Ukrainian shipbuilding, based on a review of its historical development. Methodology. In this study, the authors used a mix of methods for collecting, systematising and processing information. Primary data was collected through a review of thematic publications and research conducted by predecessors. Retrospective analysis was used to identify trends in the historical development of the shipbuilding sector of the domestic economy. Statistical analysis was used to determine its current state and foreseeable future. Results. Since Porter's introduction of the cluster theory, the Ukrainian shipbuilding business has failed to take advantage of the benefits it has offered. It has been reckless in building cluster potential as a tool for local economic development and community (hromada) management. While most shipbuilding and related enterprises are concentrated in the areas limited by the administrative boundaries of the country's Black Sea regions. Pessimists insist that the chances of success have been lost completely and irrevocably. The authors, on the other hand, based on a generalisation of current practice, observe the Phoenix effect. The authors illustrate it empirically. In particular, on the example of the Ukrainian Maritime Cluster (UMC). Practical implications. The first part of the article explores the former power of Ukrainian shipyards. The second part discusses the constructive initiatives of the modern shipbuilding business. The third part highlights the initiative to create the UMC. Value / Originality. This paper adds to the existing understanding and provides empirical evidence of the strong and untapped potential of the country's shipbuilding cluster. It also focuses on its attractiveness for cooperation with foreign investors after the onset of peace. The originality of this study lies in the holistic study of shipbuilding practice in the context of development. The authors are optimistic despite the war and the tragic consequences that accompany it.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
shipbuilding, ship repair, ship engineering, cluster, maritime cluster, small and medium business, Ukraine
Buzby, M. H. (2019) U.S. Maritime and Shipbuilding Industries: Strategies to Improve Regulation, Economic Opportunities and Competitiveness. Available at: https://www.transportation.gov/testimony/us-maritime-and-shipbuilding-industries-strategies-improve-regulation-economic
Catalogue of Ukrainian enterprises (2024). Available at: https://www.ua-region.com.ua/biznes-katalog
European Network of Maritime Clusters (2021). Available at: https://enmc.eu/
Fedii, I. S. (2020) The Story of the Liquidation of the Chernobyl Disaster: True or False? Film Reviews. Visual Anthropology, Vol. 33(2), р. 177–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2020.1721208
Grigorenko, Y. (2021) In 2020, Ukrainian shipbuilder sproduced 18 vessels. Available at: https://gmk.center/en/news/in-2020-ukrainian-shipbuilders-produced-18-vessels/
Integrated Maritime Policy of the European Union (2021). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/121/integrated-maritime-policy-of-the-european-union
Lee, J. J. (2008). Legal analysis of Sea Launch license: National security and environmental concerns. Space Policy, Vol. 24(2), р. 104–112.
Mathea, T., Bazemore, D., Iptes, M., Martinot-Lagarde, V., & Ahern, D. (2003) Industry Studies: Shipbuilding. Іndustria coll of the armed forces Washington DC. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=1683
Navarro, P. (2020) American shipbuilding: Ananchor for economic and national security. Available at: https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/10/30/american-shipbuilding-an-anchor-for-economic-and-national-security/
Olney, W. W (2020). Cabotage sabotage? The curious case of the Jones Act. Journal of International Economics, 127, 103378. Available at: https://uhero.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/UHEROwp1906.pdf
Overview of the maritime industry of Ukraine (2021) State Enterprise "Ukpromzovnishekspertiza". Kyiv, 144 р. Available at: https://maritimeukraine.com/wp-content/uploads/
Parsyk, V., Zhukova, O., & Parsyk, K. (2018) World shipbuilding: driving forces and relevant development vectors. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 4(5), р. 244–250.
Pisciotta, B. (2020) Russian revisionism in the Putinera: anoverview of post-communist military interventions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Syria. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Vol. 50(1), р. 87–106.
Rice, T. H. S., Jiang, A., & Shaipov, A. (2020) Corruption, ethicsan dintegrity in public administrationin Ukraine. In Handbook on Corruption, Ethicsand Integrity in Public Administration. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sazonets, O., & Valiullina, Z. (2017). Aerocosmic Branchesin System of World and Ukrainian Military Economics. Journal of European Economy, Vol. 16(2), p. 160–183.
Shipbuilding industry of Ukraine (2015). Available at: https://portnews.ru/digest/print/16113/?backurl=/digest/
Smart Maritime Group (Ukraine) in 2020 repaired 55 ships (2021). Available at: https://portnews.ru/news/308045/
Smith, N. (2015) Classic Project: Antonov AN-225 MRIYA. Engineering & Technology, Vol. 10(12), р. 100–101.
Strategic maritime technology industry in urgentneed for specific EU measures. (2020). Available at: https://www.seaeurope.eu/images/files/2020/press-releases/covid_19_declaration_sea-europe_final-version.pdf
Zhukova, O., Parsyak, V., & Zhukov, Y. (2017) Innovative outsourcing in the management of a multi-service engineering enterprise. Kherson: Oldi+, 248 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.