INNOVATIVENESS OF THE ECONOMY AND ITS PRIORITY SECTORS AS A FACTOR OF UKRAINE'S INTEGRATION WITH THE EU

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Mar 31, 2025

  Valentyna Diatlova

  Maryna Dielini

  Dina Yerokhina

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the positions of Ukraine in the world and European rankings compared to European countries regarding the level of innovation and its trends. This is achieved by means of methodological analysis, determining the innovativeness of the external sector of the economy according to the proposed comprehensive indicator for establishing directions for the implementation of European integration aspirations. Methodology. The study was conducted using a combination of general scientific methods and more specialised approaches, including abstract-logical analysis, system-structural analysis, statistical analysis, comparative analysis, grouping, systematization and generalization. Results. A comparison was conducted of the methodology for assessing the innovativeness of countries' economies in both world and European rankings. The investigation revealed that methodological approaches differ in single and group indicators in terms of quantity and essence. However, the calculation of a complex indicator in points is common. According to the Global Innovation Index 2024, Switzerland (for 14 years), Sweden (occupying this rank for the second year in a row), the United States of America, Singapore, and the United Kingdom are recognised as leaders. Since 2021, Ukraine's GII ranking has exhibited a discernible downward trend, attributable to the challenging military-political and economic conditions the country has experienced. The trend established by the correlation and regression analysis also indicates a further decline in the rank. However, the increase in the innovation coefficient is positive. The Summary Innovation Index, as presented in the European Innovation Scoreboard, indicates that the leading countries are Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, and Belgium, thereby substantiating the substantial discrepancy in the rankings. The prevailing sentiment regarding Ukraine is one of negativity. Ukraine's EIT score is three times worse than the EU-27 average. The priority sector in terms of integration is exports. The European Innovation Scoreboard is a comprehensive list of indicators that includes exports of medium- and high-tech products, as well as science-intensive services. The average value of exports is widely regarded as a comprehensive indicator of a nation's export capabilities. Ukraine was positioned 29th among 32 European countries in this regard. Primarily, there is a necessity for enhancement in the domain of exporting medium and high-tech products. Practical implications. The analysis of the innovativeness of the Ukrainian economy within the framework of global and European ratings allows for the identification of promising directions for the development of its priority sectors. Furthermore, the utilisation of the proposed comprehensive indicator of export innovativeness will create an analytical basis for the decision-making process concerning European integration. Value / Originality. A list of indicators of economic innovation is proposed to expand the ones used in domestic statistics, and the use of a comprehensive indicator of export innovation is suggested for comparison with European countries.

How to Cite

Diatlova, V., Dielini, M., & Yerokhina, D. (2025). INNOVATIVENESS OF THE ECONOMY AND ITS PRIORITY SECTORS AS A FACTOR OF UKRAINE’S INTEGRATION WITH THE EU. Three Seas Economic Journal, 6(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2025-1-5
Article views: 43 | PDF Downloads: 37

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

European integration, economic innovation, global and European rankings, comparison of methodologies, Ukraine's position in relation to European countries, foreign economic sector, single indicators, comprehensive indicators

References

Brodny, Ja., Tutak M., Grebski, W., & Bindzar, P. (2023). Assessing the Level of Innovativeness of EU-27 Countries and its Relationship to Economic, Environmental, Energy and Social Parameters. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, no. 9, 100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100073

Cooke, S., Ahmadi, K., Willerth S., & Herring R. (2020). Metal additive manufacturing: Technology, metallurgy and modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, no. 57 (2), p. 978–1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.025

Diatlova, V., & Polozhentseva, K. (2019). Foreign Economic Activities of Ukraine: Regional Features, Trends and Directions for Development. Economic Herald of Donbass. no. 4 (58), р. 72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-4(58)-72-79.

European Innovation Scoreboard 2024. Available at: https://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp/ec-eis-2024.pdf

Global Innovation Index 2024. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/

Growth and competitiveness in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe: The role of innovation. January (2025). Economics – working papers 2025/01. European Investment Bank. Available at: https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20240356_economics_working_paper_2025_01_en.pdf

Kraus, K., Kraus, N., & Marchenko, O. (2024). Forecasting the innovative and digital strength of Ukraine’s economy on the basis of correlation-regress analysis. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 180–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-3-180-192

Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2021). Stimulation of Foreign Economic Activities of Entrepreneurship on the Basis of Innovative Development. Theoretical & Applied Science, 93 (01), p. 8–13. DOI https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.01.93.2

Medase, S. K., & Wyrwich M. (2022). The role of innovation for employment growth among firms in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, no. 14 (3), p. 610–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1877417

Nawrocki, T. L., & Jonek-Kowalsk, I. (2024). Innovativeness of the European economies in the context of the modified European Innovation Scoreboard. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy. Available at: https://journals.economic-research.pl/eq/article/view/3063/2346

Obrimah, O. A. (2024). Measuring innovativeness: A ranking of the ordinal utility from consumption is more robust than either of ‘outcomes of commercialization’ or patent counts. Economic Analysis and Policy, no. 81, p. 603–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.024

Petryk, I. & Diatlova, V. (2019). Strategic approach to renewable energy development: EU experience. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin, vol. 2, iss. 35, p. 9–19.

Regional innovation scoreboard 2023. Available at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/statistics/performance-indicators/regional-innovation-scoreboard_en

Stroiko, T., & Hylko, M. (2024). Functioning of the innovation infrastructure of Ukraine in the context of permanent crisis phenomena. Three Seas Economic Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2024-2-5

Tomashuk, I., & Baldynyuk, V. (2023). Eco-innovation as a basis for sustainable development. Three Seas Economic Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 71–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2023-1-9

Wheatley, M. (2024). Advancements in Renewable Energy Technologies: A Decade in Review. Premier Journal of Science, 1, 100013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJS.100013