THE INTEGRATION OF TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Nov 28, 2025

  Taras Mukha

Abstract

This article analyses the integration of barcode, radio-frequency identification, global navigation satellite and Internet-of-Things sensor technologies into multimodal freight chains and assesses their effects on the operational resilience and economic efficiency of supply networks, with special reference to the Ukrainian logistics sector. The aim is twofold: (i) to quantify the performance benefits that end-to-end visibility solutions deliver and (ii) to identify the technological, organisational and institutional conditions that shape adoption in an emerging-economy context. The methodology combines a systematic literature review, implemented in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with complementary meta-analytic and qualitative synthesis techniques. Eligible empirical studies were coded against constructs derived from the resource-based view, supply-chain risk-management theory and innovation-diffusion theory. Random-effects meta-analysis generated pooled effect sizes for four logistics performance indicators—inventory days of supply, order-to-delivery lead time, total logistics cost and disruption-recovery duration—while subgroup analysis and meta-regression explored heterogeneity. Qualitative content analysis mapped the resulting adoption drivers and barriers to the Ukrainian operating environment. The findings indicate statistically significant improvements across all performance dimensions (p < 0.05). On average, inventory levels decline by 18 per cent, lead times shorten by 26 per cent, total logistics costs decrease by 7 per cent and post-disruption recovery accelerates by 32 per cent. Studies conducted in transition economies report effect sizes comparable to those in developed markets when hardware deployment is synchronised with enterprise-resource-planning harmonisation and workforce up-skilling. Within Ukraine, diffusion remains uneven; principal obstacles include high capital requirements, rural network-connectivity gaps, legacy information systems and war-related infrastructure degradation. Successful pilot projects share three characteristics: corridor-wide IoT backbones based on GS1 standards, cloud analytics platforms that interoperate with existing ERPs and public–private financing schemes that pool fixed costs for small carriers. Conclusions. Tracking technologies yield measurable resilience and efficiency gains, yet such gains materialise only when complementary digital, organisational and regulatory capabilities are present. The study proposes a phased adoption roadmap that prioritises (1) national IoT infrastructure along export corridors, (2) modular cloud-based data architectures to lower entry barriers and (3) integration of visibility requirements into post-conflict reconstruction programmes and EU alignment efforts. The findings furnish an evidence-based framework for managerial investment decisions and policy initiatives aimed at modernising logistics under financial constraint and geopolitical uncertainty.

How to Cite

Mukha, T. (2025). THE INTEGRATION OF TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. Three Seas Economic Journal, 6(3), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2025-3-10
Article views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

tracking technologies, supply-chain visibility, RFID, GPS, transport logistics

References

Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Xu, L., & Dhamija, P. (2020). Logistics innovation capability and its impacts on supply chain resilience in the Industry 4.0 era. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), 607–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2019-0311

Balakrishnan, A., & Ramanathan, U. (2021). The role of digital technologies in supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1083–1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0095

Barakat, M., Elbarky, S., & Sobhy, H. (2023). Sustainable reverse logistics service quality framework. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 1755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031755

Cichosz, M., Wallenburg, C. M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2020). Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), 209–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229

Dura, B. S., Nadeem, S. P., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Alemu, A. E., Rostami Tabar, B., Zapata, D. H., & Kreie, A. (2024). The role of technology in developing resilient supply chains: A systematic literature review during COVID-19 and economic sanctions. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 14(1), 40–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-03-2024-0036

Helo, P., & Thai, V. V. (2024). Logistics 4.0 – Digital transformation with smart connected tracking and tracing devices. International Journal of Production Economics, 275, Article 109336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109336

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450

Kopishynska, K. O. (2020). Current state and prospects of digital transformation of the transport and logistics sector of Ukraine. Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2, 99–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46783/smart-scm/2020-2-8

Krykavskyy, Y., Pokhylchenko, O., & Hayvanovych, N. (2019). Supply chain development drivers in Industry 4.0 in Ukrainian enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 273–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.014

Kumar, S., & Ramtiyal, B. (2024). An empirical investigation of traceability technology adoption: A case of perishable products supply chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(1), 159–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2024-0461

Kupalova, H., & Didukh, N. (2024). Determining the impact of blockchain technologies on the grain supply chain tracking system in the EU. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13), 60–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.318931

Lee, S., Kim, S., & Kim, N. (2021). Supply chain visibility: A Delphi study on managerial perspectives. Production Planning & Control, 32(15), 1263–1278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1834139

Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2020). Impacts of Industry 4.0 on supply chain management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1922–1954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1657247

Razak, G. M., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2023). Supply chain traceability: A review of the benefits and its relationship with supply chain resilience. Production Planning & Control, 34(11), 1114–1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1983661

Shashi, M., & Shashi, P. (2022). Sustainable cloud computing in the supply chains. In M. Kotes & V. S. L. Rao (Eds.), Expert Clouds and Applications: Proceedings of ICOECA 2022 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 1911, pp. 193–202). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1745-7_15

Unhelkar, B., Joshi, S., Sharma, M., Prakash, S., Mani, A. K., & Prasad, M. (2022). Enhancing supply chain performance using RFID technology and decision support systems in Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), Article 100084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100084

Wang, Y., Chen, H., & Song, Y. (2023). Evaluating traceability technology adoption in food supply chains: A game-theoretic approach. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020898