THE MECHANISM OF FISCAL POLICY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Lidiia Fedoryshyna

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study fiscal policy, which is one of the methods of regulating the country's macroeconomic policy. Theoretical approaches of scientists to the definition of the term "fiscal policy" are investigated. The contents and principles of the functioning of the mechanism of fiscal policy are disclosed. Method. Theoretical approaches to the definition of mechanisms and discrete components of the fiscal policy of the state and its criteria characteristics have been developed. The research has been based on the use of a systematic approach to the consideration of fiscal phenomena, on the fundamental principles of economic theory, systems theory, theory of finance, theory of taxes, etc. Results. It is observed that the budget deficit and the national debt are closely linked: the increase in the budget deficit leads to an increase in the national debt. But the absolute magnitude of the budget deficit, and therefore of the public debt, does not provide enough information for economic analysis. It is necessary to know what processes the budget deficit is serving, what changes in the reproduction cycle it reflects. It is also very important to measure changes in public debt in relation to changes in GDP. In addition, the tax burden is increasing as a result of these changes. Value/originality. It is determined that along with the expected changes in the methodology of calculation and procedure of tax payment, taxpayers are also concerned about the question of changing the tariff grid by the total amount of taxes due in absolute terms and in relation to the volume and resultant indicators of production activity (revenue, profit). An innovative tariff policy has been proposed and opportunities for using non-traditional agricultural insurance products have been revealed. Recommendations to improve the fiscal policy of the state have been made. The conceptual platform for harmonizing the mechanism of fiscal policy regarding economic entities is substantiated.

How to Cite

Fedoryshyna, L. (2020). THE MECHANISM OF FISCAL POLICY. Three Seas Economic Journal, 1(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-1-5
Article views: 33 | PDF Downloads: 36

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

methodology, analysis, fiscal policy, mechanism, macroeconomic regulation, policies of built-in stabilizers, economic, tax

References

Aleskerova, Yu., Mulyk, T., & Fedoryshyna, L. (2018). Improving credit protection analysis methods Reports of main agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-2-1-7

Aleskerova, Yu., & Fedoryshyna, L. (2018). Analysis of investment activities of enterprises of Ukraine. Economic system development trends: the experience of countries of Eastern Europe and prospects of Ukraine.

Aleskerova, Yu., Fedoryshyna, L., & Koval, N. (2018). Features of loan security for the reproduction of fixed assets for agricultural purposes. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-4-1-5

Aleskerova, Y., Kovalenko, L., & Havryliuk, V. (2019). Innovative financial criteria for methodological approaches to the assessment of agrarian insurance. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 34–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-34-41

Rogach, S., Vdovenko, L., & Polishchuk, O. (2019). Agriculture of Ukraine under the joint policy of the European Union. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 178–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-178-183

Plakhtii, T., Fedoryshyna, L., & Tomchuk, O. (2019). Socio-economic component of preferential taxation of individuals' incomes. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-171-175

Koval, N., Priamuhina, N., & Zhmurko, I. (2020). Analyz economic – financial experience of the world countries in the system of pension insurance. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-1-8

Kritzer, B. E. (1996). Privatizing social security: the Chilean experience. Social Security Bulletin, no. 3, pp. 45–55.

Kubicek (2005). Contribution rates to funded pension systems in the new member countries. Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 19, issue 2, pp. 266–280.

Bettendorf, Leon J.H. & Heijdra, Ben J. (2005). Population ageing and pension reform in a small open economy with non-traded goods. Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, no. 6, pp. 265–290.

Nicoholas George (2002). Sweden’s savers are kept pasted on state of their funds. Financial Times. 2002. March 25, p. 7.

Oskar Cerrangolo (2003). Pension Reform in Latin America. Conference on «Privatisation of Public Pension Systems – Forces, Experience, Prospects». Vienna, 2003. June 19–21, pp. 256–275.

Palmer Edvard (1998). The Swedish Pension Reform Model – Framework and Issues. The national Social Insurance Board, May. 32 p.