SPECIFIC TYPES OF RELATED PARTIES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH THEM IN INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 550: IMPACT ON THE ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT AND ESTABLISHING THE ENTITY’S ACCOUNTING POLICY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of specific types of related parties, which are allocated in International Standards on Auditing 550 “Related Parties”, not only on the organization of the audit of financial statements in the context of assessing the risk of material misstatement, but also on the organization of accounting in enterprises. To achieve the goal set in the work, a complex of general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction) and methodical techniques (systematization, generalization, review, comparison) based on the provisions of International Standards of Auditing was used. In the study of the essence of related parties transactions and elaboration their classification method of system analysis, logical method, and method of modeling were used. There are three major tasks within the overall responsibility of the auditor while fulfilling such engagement as audit of the financial statements have been determined. It is substantiated that two different phrases (“has a responsibility to perform audit procedures” and “needs to obtain an understanding”) which are used in International Standards on Auditing 550 “Related Parties” requires a separate approach to formation a set of optimal audit procedures. Specific types of related parties based on the International Standards 550 “Related Services” that should be considered when performing audit of financial statements has been identified. Classification of related parties transactions according to their riskiness and connection with the normal course of business into four different types has been elaborated. Two groups of inquiries concerning related parties transactions have been analyzed. It has been proved that making inquiries the auditor should provide as much information as possible in order to avoid misunderstandings, which may lead to difficulties in forming an opinion. It is noted that determining the characteristics of the dominant influence and significant transactions will allow effective communication and cooperation between auditors, management staff and those responsible for governance in formation inquires and answers for them. Using proposed classification in the process of audit of financial statements and in developing regulatory documents for accounting at the entity will allow appropriate assessing of risk of material misstatement and increasing the effectiveness of internal control at the entity. It has been substantiated that the objectives of accounting policy not only in terms of meeting the interests of the company as an entity that prepares financial statements and interacts with related parties, but also in terms of meeting the interests of the entity as a responsible party, interacting with the auditor, that seeks to establish an internal control system that will ensure reducing its own risks.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
audit engagements, audit of financial statements, related parties, related parties transactions, risk of material misstatement, significant transactions, audit evidence, inquiry, accounting policy, internal control
Antoniuk, O.R. (2018). Vektory rozvytku system kontroliu yakosti nadannia audytorskykh posluh v Ukraini [Vectors of development of quality control systems for audit services in Ukraine]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky [Global and national economic problems] (electronic journal), no. 21. Available at: http://global-national.in.ua/issue-21-2018/29-vipusk-21-lyutij-2018-r/3833-antonyuk-o-r-vektori-rozvitku-sistemi-kontrolyu-yakosti-nadannya-auditorskikh-poslug-v-ukrajini.
Audytorska palata Ukrainy (2019). Analiz typovykh pomylok, yaki buly vyiavleni pid chas zovnishnikh perevirok systemy kontroliu yakosti, provedenykh vidpovidno do vymoh Polozhennia pro zovnishni perevirky systemy kontroliu yakosti audytorskykh posluh, zatverdzhenoho rishenniam Audytorskoi palaty Ukrainy vid 30.10.2014 № 302/9 (zi zminamy) do nabrannia chynnosti Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro audyt finansovoi zvitnosti ta audytorsku diialnist» [Analysis of typical errors that were identified during external inspections of the quality control system, conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Regulation on external inspections of the quality control system of audit services, approved by the Audit Chamber of Ukraine dated 30.10.2014 № 302/9 (as amended) before the Law Of Ukraine "On audit of financial statements and audit activities"]. Available at: https://cutt.ly/MkiW5JB
El-Helaly, Moataz (2018). Related-Party Transactions: A Review of the Regulation, Governance, and Auditing Literature (August 15, 2018). Managerial Auditing Journal, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1602
El-Helaly, Moataz, Georgiou, Ifigenia, & Lowe, Alan D. (2018). The Interplay between Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The role of Audit Quality. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, vol. 32, pp. 47–60.
Fang, Junxiong, Lobo, Gerald, Zhang, Yinqi, & Zhao, Yuping (2017). Auditing Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Audit Opinions and Restatements. Auditing. A Journal of Practice & Theory, April 2017, no. 37 (2), pp. 73–106. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51768
Fesenko, V. V. (2019). Metodolohiia audytu ta analizu zovnishnoekonomichnoi diialnosti poviazanykh pidpryiemstv [Methodology of audit and analysis of foreign economic activity of related companies] (PhD Thesis), Dnipro : Ternopil. nats. ekon. un-t.
Henry, Elaine, Gordon, Elizabeth A., Reed, Brad J., & Louwers, Timothy J. (2012). The Role of Related Party Transactions in Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting. Vol. 4, Issue 1.
Honcharova, V. H. (2020). Orhanizatsiino-metodychni pidkhody do audytu operatsii z poviazanymy osobamy [Organizational and methodological approaches to the audit of transactions with related parties]. Ahrosvit [Agro-world], no. 13–14, pp. 54–60.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC/IAASB), (2016-2017). Supplement to the Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements, Vol. I, 2016-2017 Edition. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/2016-2017-handbook-international-quality-control-auditing-review-other
Louwers, Timothy J., Henry, Elaine, Reed, Brad J. & Gordon, Elizabeth A. (2008). Deficiencies in Auditing Related-Party Transactions: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing American Accounting Association, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. A10–A16.
Mustikarini, Arizona, & Khansa, Nadia Destianne (2017). Do Related Party Transactions Matter to Auditors? Evidence from Audit Opinion. Proceedings of the 18th Asian Academic Accounting Association (FourA) Annual Conference (Indonesia, Bali, November 22-23, 2017).
Novichenko, L. S. (2020). Audyt operatsii iz poviazanymy storonamy [Audit of related party transactions]. Proceedings of the Stratehiia rozvytku Ukrainy : VII Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia (Ukraine, Kyiv, 2020), Kyiv: Informatsiino-analitychne ahentstvo, pp. 184–186.
Riadska, V. V. (2015). Audyt u rozvytku pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti v Ukraini [Audit in the development of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine] (PhD Thesis), Kyiv: Kyiv. nats. ekon. un-t im. V. Hetmana.
Tsarenko, O. V., & Karmazina, N. V. Umovy zabezpechennia kerovanoho vplyvu mizhnarodnykh standartiv audytu na efektyvnist diialnosti maloho biznesu v rehionakh Ukrainy [Conditions for ensuring the managed impact of international auditing standards on the efficiency of small business in the regions of Ukraine]. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, vol. 2, pp. 103–107.
Yang, L., Ruan, L., & Tang, F. (2020), "The impact of disclosure level and client incentive on auditors’ judgments of related party transactions", International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 717–737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2020-0016