PATTERNS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN LEGAL BEHAVIOR: ETHNIC ASPECTS. PART ONE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article aims to display and analyze the nature of the attitude of the multiethnic population to the settlement of disputes and conflicts in the judicial system of Latvia. The goal is attained through the analysis of the significance of ethnic differences: 1. in influencing people's ideas about the judicial system in Latvia, the principles of fair justice implemented in it; 2. in assessing the importance of the judicial system in resolving conflicts that are not directly related to the ethno-cultural identity of the parties to these conflicts; 3. in assessing the importance of the judicial system in resolving conflicts that unfold over the public manifestations of collective ethno-cultural identities. As an empirical base, the author used the data of sociological research conducted by him in Daugavpils in 2014.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
legal system, judicial system, dispute resolution, ethno-cultural identity
2. Par tiesu varu. (2018) https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=62847(12.2.2018)
3. Зотов Д.В., Сыщикова Т.М. (2013) Какой поступок умаляет авторитет судебной власти? Судебная власть и уголовный процесс. №2. Сс. 144 – 151.
4. Развейкина Н.А. (2016) Доверие населения к судебной власти. Юридический вестник Самарского университета. Сс. 99 – 105.
5. Хёффе О. (2007) Справедливость. Москва: Праксис.
6. Hrehovà Н. (2014) Morality and justice in social life. Studia Philosophiae Christianae. No. 50.3. Рр. 8 – 19.
7. Smith D. J. (1997) Ethnic Origins, Crime, and Criminal Justice in England and Wales. In: M. Torny (ed.) Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pp. 101-182.
8. Jackson J., Pooler T., Hohl K, Kuha J. (2011) Trust in Justice: Topline Results from Round 5 of the European Social Survey. London: Еhe Institute for Criminal Policy Research, Birkbeck, University of London.
9. Van de Walle S. (2009) Trust in the Justice System: A Comparative View Across Europe. Prison Service Journal. Issue 183. Pp. 22 – 26.
10. Austere L., Kalniņš V. (2010) Ētikas jautājumi un korupcijas riskiRīgas apgabaltiesā. Rīga: Sabiedriskās politikas centrs Providus.
11. Litvins G. (2014) Likuma vara un taisnīguma nodrošināšana. – Rozenvalds J. (ed.) Cik demokrātiska ir Latvija?: Demokrātijas audits, 2005–2014. Rīga: LU Sociālo un politisko pētījumu institūts.
12. Veidne: Latvijas iedzīvotāju nacionālais sastāvs. (2018) https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veidne:Latvijasiedz%C4%ABvot%C4%81ju_nacion%C4%81lais_sast%C4%81vs (5.10.2018)
13. Рига. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0% B8%D0%B3%D0% B0# Национальный_состав (5.10.2018).
14. Даугавпилс. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0% D1%83%D0%B3%D0% B0%D0%B2%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%81 (5.10.2018).
15. Елгава. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0% B0%D0%B2%D0%B0 (5.10.2018).
16. Лиепая. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%8F (5.10.2018).
17. Резекне. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BA% D0%BD%D0%B5 (5.10.2018).
18. Юрмала. (2018) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0 (5.10.2018).
19. Daugavpils. (2016) https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daugavpils#Etniskais_sastāvs. (5.10.2018).
20. Iedzīvotāju skaita sadalījums pēc valstiskās piederības 2016.gada 1.janvārī (%). (2016) Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. www.csb.gov.lv
21. Ņikišins J., Rozenvalds J., Zepa B. (2014) Politiskā kultūra un demokrātija. – Rozenvalds J. (ed.) Cik demokrātiska ir Latvija?: Demokrātijas audits, 2005–2014. Rīga: LU Sociālo un politisko pētījumu institūts.