ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF FORMING A LIFE SAFETY CULTURE IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS UNDER CONDITIONS OF SOCIAL RISK
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article examines the ethical foundations of forming a life safety culture in the educational environment as a key condition for sustainable human development under conditions of social instability, technological risks, and wartime challenges. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing vulnerability of educational participants and the increasing complexity of ethical dilemmas related to safety, responsibility, and human dignity. The research is based on an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis combining pedagogy, ethics, philosophy of education, and life safety studies. Methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, and conceptual modeling were applied. The results demonstrate that ethical values act as an internal regulator of safe behavior, transforming external safety requirements into personally meaningful norms. The article substantiates pedagogical conditions for integrating ethical principles into life safety education and outlines prospects for developing value-oriented educational models aimed at strengthening individual and collective safety.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
moral responsibility, educational ethics, safety culture, human dignity, risk awareness, wartime education, social responsibility
2. Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO : Paradigm Publishers.
3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
4. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalisation is reshaping our lives. London : Profile Books.
5. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
6. Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
8. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris : OECD Publishing.
9. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
10. Schleicher, A. (2019). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris : OECD Publishing.
11. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
12. UNESCO. (2020). Education in emergencies: Guidelines and policy considerations. Paris : UNESCO Publishing.
13. UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris : UNESCO Publishing.
14. World Health Organization. (2021). Mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies. Geneva : WHO.
15. Zembylas, M. (2017). The ethical implications of emotional dimensions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.006
16. Bernatska, Zh. (2020). Administratyvno-hospodarske pravo yak pravova osnova formuvannia ta realizatsii ekonomichnoi funktsii ukrainskoi derzhavy [Administrative and commercial law as a legal basis for the formation and implementation of the economic function of the Ukrainian state]. Administratyvne pravo i protses, 3(30), 5–16. doi:10.17721/2227-796X.2020.3.01 (in Ukrainian).
17. Kremen, V. (2019). Filosofiia osvity XXI stolittia [Philosophy of education of the XXI century]. Kyiv : Hramota (in Ukrainian).
18. Lutai, V. (2018). Etychni zasady profesiinoi diialnosti pedahoha [Ethical foundations of professional pedagogical activity]. Pedahohichna nauka, 2, 12–18 (in Ukrainian).