STRESSORS OF MOTHER – ADMINISTRATORS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Michael C. Mabalay

Abstract

This study assessed the stressors of mother-administrators of three public and ten private Higher Education Institutions in the province of Nueva Ecija. The samples were 100 mother-administrators who perform administrative functions like that of the President, Vice President, Dean, Director and Department Heads. The descriptive method of research was used. Data from Administrative Stress Index (ASI) survey questionnaire were tallied and analyzed using frequency, weighted mean, percentage, cross-tabulation and analysis of variance. As to personal profile, majority of the mother-administrators were at the age group of 41-50, their length of service ranged from 1-8 years and majority of them were doctorate degree holders. The stress level of mother-administrators was found “low” to “mild” using the Administrative Stress Index (ADI) which was categorized such as administrative responsibility (X= 2.60) “mild”, role expectations (x=2.39) “low”, intrapersonal conflicts (x=2.37) “low”, interpersonal relations (x=2.35) “low” and administrative constraints (x=2.33) “low”. Most of the mother-administrators from private HEIs were stressed in preparation and allocating budgets resources (2.84) “mild”, being involved in the collective bargaining process (2.84) “mild”, attempting to meet social expectations (housing, friends, etc.) (2.84) “mild” and administering the negotiated contract (grievance, interpretations) (2.67) “mild” while, mother-administrators from public HEIs were stressed in trying to complete reports and other paperwork (2.62) described as ”mild”. Analysis of variance showed that there was no significant difference in the stress level and age with F-value (0.145806) and F-critical value (3.109311), furthermore, length of service has F-value (1.302064) and F-critical value (2.467493) and finally, educational attainment has F-value (0.027632) and F-critical value (3.090187) and the null hypothesis is accepted. The level of coping preference scale and coping factor of mother-administrators of higher education institutions revealed that the Coping Preference Scale (CPS) utilized were (35.71%) described as “often” with ranked 1, followed by (35.57%) described as “occasionally” with ranked 2, followed by (12.57%) described as “frequently” with ranked 3, next is (12.29%) described as “rarely” with ranked 4 and lastly, only (3.86%) described as “never” with ranked 5. This means that the mother-administrators of higher education institutions which uniformly reflected a rating of “often”.

How to Cite

C. Mabalay, M. (2018). STRESSORS OF MOTHER – ADMINISTRATORS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. Economics & Education, 3(2), 32-38. Retrieved from http://baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/econedu/article/view/1051
Article views: 57 | PDF Downloads: 35

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

administrative stress index, coping preference scale

References

Aldwin C M 1994 Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspectiv New York: The Guilford Press

Allison D G 1997 Coping with stress in the principalship Journal of Educational Administration 35(1) 39-55

American Heritage College Dictionary 2002 New York: Houghton-Mifflin

American Institute of Stress 2009 Stress, definition of stress, stressor, what is stress? E-source: http://www.stress.org/topic-definition-stress.htm

Atwood W S 1997 Stress among high school principals in California high schools Dissertation Abstracts International 58(1) 0035 (UMI 9720179)

Baets W 2006 Complexity, learning, and organizations: A quantum interpretation of business New York: Routledge

Barnett R 1994 Home-to-work spillover revisited: A study of full-time employed women in dualearner couples Journal of Marriage & Family 56(3) 647-56

Barnett R C, Baruch G K 1985 Women’s involvement in multiple roles and psychological distress Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(1) 135-45

Barnett R C, Hyde J 2001 Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory American Psychologist 56(10) 781-96

Barnett R C, Rivers C 1998 She works, he works: How two-income families are happy, healthy, and thriving Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Barnett R C, Marshall N L, Sayer A 1992 Positive spillover effects from job to home: A closer look Women & Health 19(2/3) 13-41

Beck L, Murphy J 1993 Understanding the principalship: A metaphorical analysis from 1920-1990 New York: Teachers College Press

Blix G, Cruis R, Mitchell B, Blix G G 1993 Occupational stress among university teachers Educational Research 36(2) 157-69

Botts J S 1986 Self-perceptions of Iowa public school superintendents towards occupational stress (Doctoral dissertation, Drake University, 1986) Dissertation Abstracts International 47(05) 1541

Burke R 2000 Workaholism in organizations: Psychological and physical well-being consequences Stress and Health 16(1) 11-6

Campbell L, Williamson J 1987 Stress in the principalship: What causes it? NASSP Bulletin 71(500) 109-12

Carver C, Scheier M, Weintraub J 1989 Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 267-83

Carver C, Pozo C, Harris S, Noriega V, Scheier M, Robinson D, et al. 1993 How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A Study of women with early stage breast cancer Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(2) 375-90

Clark S C 2000 Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance Human Relations 53(6) 747-70

Ceslowitz S B 1989 Burnout and coping strategies among school administrators E-source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2768683

Chirichello M 2003 Reinventing the principalship: From centrist to collective leadership In F. C. Lunenburg & C. S. Carr, Shaping the future (pp.355-376) Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education

Folkman S, Lazaurs R 1988 Ways of Coping Questionnaire Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Gary-Toft P, Anderson J 1981 The nursing stress scale: development of an instrument Journal of Behavioral Assessment 3 11-23

Goodson M 2000 Assisting the assistant principal Principal 79(4) 56-7

Getzels J W, Guba E G 1957 Social Behavior and the Administrative Process The School Review 65(4) 423-41

Gmelch W H, Chan W 1995 Administrator stress and coping effectiveness: Implications for administrator evaluation and development Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 9(3) 275-85

Gmelch W H, Gates G 1998 The impact of personal, professional, and organizational characteristics on administrator burnout Journal of Educational Administration 36(2) 146-59

Saffer S 1998 Stress and the educational administrator: A synthesis of dissertation New Orleans LA. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267 568)

Selye H 1981 The Concept of Stress In L. I Kutash, et al. (eds), Stress and Anxiety: Contemporary Knowledge, Theory and Treatment, London: Jossey – Bass Publishers

Torelli J A, Gmelch W H 1992 Occupational stress and burnout in educational administration Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco: CA

Vachon M 2001 The nurse’s role: the world of palliative care nursing In: Ferrell B. and Coyle N, (eds.), The Textbook of Palliative Nursing. New York: Oxford; 647-62