SUBJECTIVE DISPOSITION OF SMART ECONOMY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article deals with the topical issue of modern economic development – the formation of Smart economy. The purpose of the article is to determine the subjective disposition and identify the characteristics of the main subjects of Smart economy. To achieve this goal, the article uses the method of system-structural analysis to identify the main subjects and characterize their properties in the context of the formation of Smart economy. The phenomenon of smart economy is associated with the growth of its reasonable nature, increasing attention to social and environmental issues, the priority of the principles of sustainable development. The changes taking place in the activity of the main actors (households, business, state) under the influence of the processes of digitalization, socialization, greening, urbanization, institutionalization are studied. Under the influence of digitalization, relations between actors in the process of economic activity are significantly accelerated, changed, and acquire new forms of manifestation. Sustainable development goals become a priority for any entity. New institutions and management mechanisms are being formed at various levels with the involvement of a wide range of new agents. The formation of smart economy is characterized by the following features: the spread of socially responsible business; penetration of smart technologies in all spheres of business, life and management; responsibility for the environment; priority of sustainable development goals in management at different levels; formation of smart living conditions for individuals and communities.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
globalization, information and communication technologies (ICT), digitalization, institutionalization, urbanization, greening, socialization, Smart-city
Adiyarta, K., Napitupulu, D., Syafrullah, M., Mahdiana, D., & Rusdah, R. (2019). Analysis of smart city indicators based on prisma: systematic review IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 725, 3rd Nommensen International Conference on Technology and Engineering 2019 (3rd NICTE) 25–26 July, Nommensen HKBP University, Indonesia.
Angelidou, M. (2016). Four European Smart City Strategies International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 4, No. 4; April 2016 Available online: March 3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v4i4.1364;
Bruneckiene, J. (2014). The concept of smart economy under the context of creation the economic value in the city. Public Policy and Administration, 13(3), 469–482.
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.
Eremia, M., Toma, L., & Sanduleac, M. The Smart City Concept in the 21st Century. 10th International Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, INTER-ENG 2016. E-source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817309402
ESG-investing on the rise: implications. E-source: https://www.bankinghub.eu/banking/research-markets/the-rise-of-esg-investing
Galperina, L. P., Girenko, A. T., & Mazurenko, V. P. (2016). The concept of smart economy as the basis for sustainable development of Ukraine. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(88), 307–314. E-source: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3757
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E. & Pichler-Milanović, N. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna. E-source: http://www.smartcities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf found on 18th of June, 2008;
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. & Perraton, J. (1999) .Global transformations. Oxford. Polity Press.
Heylin, M. (2006). Globalization of science rolls on. In Science & Technology, 84(48), 26–31.
International standart ISO/DIS 26000. E-source: http://www.lsd.lt/typo_new/fileadmin/Failai/N172_ISO_DIS_26000__E_.pdf
ITU-D Digital Innovation Ecosystems. International Telecommunication Union. E-source: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Innovation/Pages/default.aspx
Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing globalization. In Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285–305.
Kumar, M. V., Bharat, Daliya (2017). Smart Economy in Smart Cities. Smart Cities, Local Community and Socio-economic Development: The Case of Bologna, p. 12.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), June. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
Maximova, V. F. (2011). Smart (intellectualnaja) economica: tseli, zadachi i perspectivi. Otkritoje obrazovanije, 3, 63–71. E-source: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/smart-intellektualnaya-ekonomika-tseli-zadachi-i-perspektivy/viewer
Mazurenko, V. P. (2014). Implementation of network paradigm as a guarantee a highly competitive country. Vol. 119. Kyiv: Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. P. 60–73.
Novotny, R., Kuchta, R., & Kadlec, J. (2014). Smart City Concept, Applications and Services. Journal of Telecommunications System & Management, 3, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0919.1000117
Smart Economy: Economía Inteligente. E-source: https://web.ua.es/en/smart/smart-economy-economia-inteligente.html
Smart Government. E-source: https://web.ua.es/en/smart/smart-government.html