THE SMART SPECIALIZATION APPROACH THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE KEY PROVISIONS OF THE THEORY OF FREE TRADE: CONCLUSIONS FOR UKRAINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the approach of smart specialization through the prism of key provisions of D. Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage, to identify its limitations for industrial weak countries and on this basis to identify key guidelines for the development of smart specialization strategies in Ukraine in view of the challenges of the postwar era. Materials and methods. The study is based on theoretical works of Ukrainian and foreign scientists on the problems of implementing the approach of smart-specialization in the practice of regional development. The work was carried out using the methods of systematization and generalization, analysis and synthesis, comparative analysis, and systematic approach. Results. The theoretical basis of the approach of "smart specialization" is revealed, the synthesis of economic schools, theories and concepts underlying this approach is defined. The insufficient theoretical development of its main provisions, which is negatively reflected in practice, especially in less economically developed countries and regions, was substantiated. It is concluded that the reasons for this lie, in particular, in the limitations of the Ricardian theory, on the provisions of which the smart specialization approach is based. It is emphasized that the Ricardian theory does not take into account the technological factor, which considers the technological base of the country as a constant, which does not give industrial weak countries an opportunity to change the raw material nature of their economy to a fundamentally new - innovative one. The historical retrospective traces the strategy of development of economically powerful countries in achieving their international competitive advantages, which is diametrically opposed to Ricardian theory. On the basis of this the key guidelines for the development of strategies of reasonable specialization in Ukraine in the post-war period of its reconstruction in order to prevent the preservation of the raw material nature of the national economy and its secondary position in the world are outlined. Conclusion. It is proved that post-war reconstruction of Ukraine should be aimed at radical changes in the structure of the economy, the transition from the agrarian-raw type to industrial-innovative type on the basis of creating a modern high-tech industry in the conditions of unfolding in the world of a new technological revolution.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
smart specialization, strategies of smart specialization, theory of comparative advantages, technological base of the country, industry, innovative nature of the economy, Ukraine, post-war period
European Commission (2017). Smart Regions. Smart Specialization. E-source: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/smart_spec/strength_innov_regions_en.pdf
Foray, D., David, P.A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialisation: from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI-Working_Paper-2011-001. Lausanne: Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne.
Commission of the European Communities. (1996). The First Action Plan for Innovation in Europe. Innovation for growth and employment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 20.11.1996 COM (96) 589 final.
Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Benner, M. (2019). Smart specialisation and institutional context: what does it mean for path development? Papers in Economic Geography and Innovation Studies. Vienna University. E-source: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/geo-disc-2019_05.pdf.
Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Ridriguez-Pose, A. (2019). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54 (6), 737–753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
National Archives. (2022). Alexander Hamilton’s Final Version of the Report on the Subject of Manufactures [5 December 1791]. Founders Online. E-source: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-10-02-0001-0007
Chang, Ha-Joon. (2014). Economics: The User's Guide. London: Penguin books.
Monne, Zh. (2000). Real'nost' i politika. Memuary [Reality and politics. Memoirs]. Moskva: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovanij/ (in Russian)
Reinert, E.S. (2016). Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How Rich Countries got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor]. Moskva: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki (in Russian).
Pidorycheva, I. Yu., & Antoniuk, V. P. (2022). Modern Development Trends and Prospects for Innovation in the Technology-Intensive Sectors of Ukraine’s Industry. Sci. innov, 18, 1, 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.01.003.
Omelyanenko, V., Braslavska, O., Biloshkurska, N., Biloshkursky, M., Kliasen, N., & Omelyanenko, O. (2021). C-Engineering Based Industry 4.0 Innovation Networks Sustainable Development. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21, 9, 267–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.9.35
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). Smart specialization, entrepreneurship and SMEs: issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy. Small Business Economics, 46, 537–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9707-z.
Ponomarenko, T. V., Prokopenko, O. V., Slatvinskyi, M. A., Biloshkurska N. V., & Omelyanenko, V. A. (2019). National investment and innovation security assessment methodology. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10 (2), 847–857.
Omelyanenko, V. (2015). Analysis of strategycal aspects of technology transfer in metallurgy. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 12, 394–397.
Territory of innovations: best practices for sustainable development at the local level (2022). Part 1: digest of analytical stage of international scientific and educational project. Collective Monograph. Sc. ed. V. Omelianenko, O. Prokopenko, T. Tirto. Tallinn: Teadmus.