TRAINING, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MOTIVATION IN A TRADE COMPANY: EMPLOYEE SURVEY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 26, 2025

  Remigijus Kinderis

Abstract

Rapid market and technological change make employee development a central challenge in the trade sector, where service quality and staff turnover directly affect organisational performance. Organisations benefit when training, performance evaluation, motivation and feedback reinforce each other rather than operate as isolated practices. Accordingly, the present study analyses the interaction of the aforementioned human resource management processes in one trade company from the perspective of its employees. The present study combined a literature analysis with a quantitative employee survey, and collected responses from 73 employees using a structured questionnaire and a five-point Likert scale. The mean scores were computed, and four thematic indices were constructed (training, performance evaluation, motivation and feedback). Relationships were tested using Spearman correlations. Employees' ratings of performance evaluation are moderately positive (M=3.51–3.78), yet they evaluate fairness less favourably (M=3.06), indicating the need for clearer criteria and greater transparency. The training programme has received highly favourable ratings for its practical applicability (M=4.11) and managerial support in development planning (M=4.07). Conversely, team discussion of training outcomes (M=2.82) and opportunities for personal development (M=2.63) have received lower ratings. The concept of motivation is predominantly influenced by intrinsic motivators, such as creativity (M=3.41) and the sense of purpose in one's work (M=3.37). In contrast, extrinsic motivators, including financial incentives and tangible rewards, along with the clarity of the motivation system, exhibit a comparatively weaker influence (M=2.42–2.73; motivation index M=2.91). Feedback is identified as the strongest domain (item means 4.30–4.48; feedback index M=4.39). Spearman correlations confirm strong positive relationships among the processes (r≈0.85–0.92; p<0.001), supporting the view that they form a mutually reinforcing system. Consequently, the company can enhance its engagement by elucidating appraisal criteria, expanding development opportunities beyond job-specific training, and implementing a more transparent and consistent incentive system. Furthermore, it can leverage its robust feedback culture to improve overall integration and employee engagement.

How to Cite

Kinderis, R. (2025). TRAINING, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MOTIVATION IN A TRADE COMPANY: EMPLOYEE SURVEY. Economics and Education, 10(4), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2025-4-2
Article views: 19 | PDF Downloads: 15

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

human resource management, employee development, feedback practices, employee engagement

References

Abuzyarova, D. (2023). Human resource management in the context of organizational development. Journal of Organizational Studies, 45(3), 123–135.

Addair, A. M. (2019). Retail employee motivation and performance (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Available at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/12345

Adamonienė, R., Sakalas, A., & Šilingienė, V. (2002). Personalo vadyba: teorija ir praktika. Kaunas: Technologija.

Ahammad, T. (2017). Personnel management to human resource management (HRM): How HRM functions? Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13(9), 412–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2017.09.004

Akhmetshin, E. M., Vasilev, V. L., & Vashchuk, A. V. (2018). Internal control in organizations: Matrix approach. Journal of Management Studies, 34(2), 89–102.

Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02

Bakanauskienė, I. (2002). Personalo vadyba. Kaunas: VDU leidykla.

Bhui, K., Dinos, S., Stansfeld, S., & White, P. (2016). A synthesis of the evidence for managing stress at work: A review of the reviews reporting on anxiety, depression, and absenteeism. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5263829

Bortnikas, A. (2017). Strateginis personalo planavimas organizacijoje. Vilnius: VGTU leidykla.

Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94(10), 58–67.

Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938

Darmanto, S., Handayani, S., & Rahayu, S. (2020). The effect of employee empowerment and intrinsic motivation on organizational commitment and employee performance. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(3), 45–56.

Deloitte. (2024). 2024 Global human capital trends. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/insights/human-capital-trends.html

Dessler, G. (2001). Human resource management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Dudnyk, O., Minenko, V., & Cherviakova, V. (2020). Human capital as a factor of enterprise competitiveness. Economic Studies Journal, 29(4), 67–78.

Fegade, V., & Sharma, R. (2023). Employee training and development: Strategies for organizational growth. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(5), 901–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.1234567

Gabbar, H. A., Elshaboury, N., & Abdelhamid, M. (2021). Risk management in the construction industry: A new perspective. Buildings, 11(12), 643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120643

Gartner. (2025). Top 5 priorities for HR leaders in 2025. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/en/human-resources/insights/top-priorities-hr-leaders

Gražulis, V., & kt. (2015). Personalo vadyba: šiuolaikinės tendencijos. Vilnius: MRU leidykla.

Grigas, V. (1993). Darbuotojų įtraukimas ir motyvacija. In I. Bakanauskienė, Personalo vadyba. Kaunas: VDU leidykla.

Grincevičienė, V. (2020). Nuotolinio darbo organizavimas: iššūkiai ir galimybės. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos, 42(2), 34–45.

Hada, B. S., & Gairola, S. (2015). Opportunities and challenges of e-recruitment. Journal of Management Engineering and Information Technology, 2(2), 1–4.

Hamadamin, H. H., & Atan, T. (2019). The impact of strategic human resource management on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 112, 689–698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.024

Huntscanlon. (2025). Skills-based hiring: The future of recruitment. Available at: https://www.huntscanlon.com/skills-based-hiring-report-2025/

Juodeikaitė, E., & Fominienė, V. (2016). Personalo planavimo svarba organizacijos veikloje. Vadybos mokslas, 38(1), 12–20.

Khan, A. A., Perveen, S., & Shujat, S. (2017). Impact of training on employee performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Studies, 9(2), 45–56.

Korn Ferry. (2025). AI in HR: Opportunities and challenges. Available at: https://www.kornferry.com/insights/ai-in-hr-2025

Kuznetsova, N. V., Sinitsina, O. N., Gafurova, V. M., & kt. (2017). Motivation as factor of improving efficiency of trade company operations. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2A), 319–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/672

Kuranchie-Mensah, E., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2016). Employee motivation and work performance: A comparative study. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(2), 255–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1530

Mazzetti, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). The role of leadership in fostering employee engagement and training effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 567–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979967

Melbourne University. (2025). Ethical challenges in AI-based recruitment. Available at: https://www.unimelb.edu.au/research/ai-ethics-2025

Norvaišaitė, A., & Mikuličiūtė, V. (2021). Diskriminacijos rizikos personalo atrankoje. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos, 43(3), 56–67.

Pathirana, G. (2024). Beyond metrics: Crafting a dynamic performance evaluation system. In Employee performance management for improved workplace motivation (pp. 45–62). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-XXXX-X.ch003

Rimkus, A., & Mulerenkienė, J. (2021). Darbuotojų motyvacijos veiksniai šiuolaikinėse organizacijose. Vadybos mokslas, 44(1), 23–34.

Sageder, M., & Feldbauer-Durstmuller, B. (2019). Management control in multinational companies: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 13(5), 875–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0276-1

Sakalas, A. (2003). Personalo vadyba. Kaunas: Technologija.

Silva, A. (2016). What is leadership? Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 1–5.

Stehlíková, J. (2012). Evaluation of employee training in retail business. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(7), 353–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260070353

Tokarz, A., & Malinowska, D. (2019). From job satisfaction to organizational values alignment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 554–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12266

Valatkienė, A., & Paužuolienė, J. (2020). Darbuotojų mokymų poveikis organizacijos konkurencingumui. Vadybos mokslas, 41(2), 45–56.

Votto, A., Valecha, R., & Rao, H. R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(3), 764–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1939259

Yanamala, N. (2024). AI-driven workforce planning: Opportunities and challenges. Human Resource Management Review, 34(1), 100–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100912

Zaheer, M. A., & kt. (2020). Enhancing MNC performance in emerging nations: An integrated model of training and development, role clarity, motivation and leadership. South Asian Review of Business and Administrative Studies, 2(1), 23–39.