BEHAVIOURAL DETERMINANTS OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLING SYSTEM OF REAL SECTOR ENTERPRISES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 26, 2025

  Oleksiy Tumanov

  Ievgenii Nagornyi

Abstract

The research subject is the impact of cognitive biases on the efficiency of investment decisions within the real economy and how these biases can be integrated into financial control systems. The research methodology takes a comprehensive approach, combining regression analysis to identify statistical patterns with the Mamdani fuzzy inference system to model non-linear interactions between behavioural determinants. The empirical basis comprises 67 investment projects of Ukrainian enterprises for the period 2022–2024 and data collected via a structured questionnaire containing 45 questions designed to diagnose cognitive biases. The research objective is twofold: first, to identify the dominant behavioural determinants of investment decisions based on empirical analysis; and second, to develop tools for considering these determinants in the financial control systems of enterprises in the real sector. The research results demonstrate that cognitive biases systematically reduce the efficiency of investment projects. The Regression Model illustrates the detrimental effects of the sunk cost fallacy, overconfidence bias, the anchoring effect and herding behaviour on the discrepancy between the actual and planned NPV, accounting for 54.7% of the variation in the dependent variable. The most influential factors are the sunk cost fallacy (β = -1.40, p < 0.001) and the overconfidence bias (β = -1.05, p = 0.002). The developed Mamdani Model, which incorporates nine expert rules, enables the formalisation of nonlinear synergistic effects between biases and the identification of critical risk zones when combining high values of determinants. The correlation between the Mamdani Model and the regression results is 0.89 (p < 0.001), which confirms the validity of the fuzzy approach. The practical significance lies in creating operational tools for behavioural control with linguistic rules for diagnosing cognitive distortions when making investment decisions. These results can be used by the financial services departments of enterprises to improve control systems and reduce the impact of psychological factors on the quality of investment decisions.

How to Cite

Tumanov, O., & Nagornyi, I. (2025). BEHAVIOURAL DETERMINANTS OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLING SYSTEM OF REAL SECTOR ENTERPRISES. Economics and Education, 10(4), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2025-4-6
Article views: 11 | PDF Downloads: 9

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

behavioural determinants, investment decisions, financial controlling, cognitive biases, fuzzy logic, Mamdani Model, real sector economy

References

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 263–291.

Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. Journal of Finance. Vol. 60. No. 6. P. 2661–2700.

Ben-David, I., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2013). Managerial Miscalibration. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 128. No. 4. P. 1547–1584.

Ahmad, Z., Ibrahim, H., & Tuyon, J. (2024). Impact of behavioral biases on investment decisions and the moderation effect of financial literacy: evidence of Pakistan. Heliyon. Vol. 10. No. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31800

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 124–140.

Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 1–13.

Babiаk, N. D., & Tumanov, O. V. (2024). Behavioral controlling in crisis situations: improving financial and management decision-making in wartime. Actual Problems of Economics. No. 5. P. 223–233.

Shunmugasundaram, V., & Sinha, A. (2025). The impact of behavioral biases on investment decisions: a serial mediation analysis. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. Vol. 30. No. 59. P. 5–21.

Barber, B., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 116. P. 261–292.

Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. Vol. 16. P. 27–44.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 338–353.

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W.W. Norton, 432 p.