INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY SECTOR
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to improve the theoretical and methodological foundations for studying the essence and peculiarities of development of the institutional environment of the digital economy sector, to allocate the components of its architectonics as the basis for forming a platform for the conceptual development of the national economy based on digitalisation. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is formed by modern economic and sociological institutional theories, the object of analysis of which is the institutional dynamics of the environment: institutional theory, new institutional theory, substantivist theory, the concept of institutional density, the concept of institutional matrices, the theory of societal psyche. The paper uses the historical-logical and dialectical methods to study the contradictions of the processes of formation and development of the institutional environment, as well as the methods of system analysis to study the components of the architectonics of the institutional environment of the digital economy. Results. From the standpoint of institutional theory, it is formulated and substantiated that the institutional environment of the digital economy sector is a synthesis of a set of formal/іnformal basic/complementary institutions of the traditional and digital economies of different levels and institutions that are in certain interconnections and relationships with each other, forming a hierarchical integrity. Institutions determine the creation and operation of relevant institutions, which, in turn, ensure the implementation and enforcement of established rules and regulations. At the same time, the resilience and flexibility of the environment is based on the natural accumulation or forced implementation of basic institutions capable of ensuring the emergence of new digital economy institutions or significant modernisation of existing ones, which protects and promotes the development of the digital economy. The task of managing the institutional environment is to balance the ratio of institutions. The architectonics of the institutional environment of the digital economy sector is a system that combines a functional set of institutions of the traditional economy (management, labour, property, market, non-market), specific institutions of the digital economy (information, participation, digital space), global institutions, and regional institutions. Institutions as systemic elements, through implementation/legitimation mechanisms, form a set of institutions of the digital economy that mediate the interaction of economic actors, provide contracting, and mechanisms of institutional change. The most important institutions include innovation labs, research centres, technology companies, start-ups, cryptocurrency exchanges, digital agencies, consultancies, educational institutions, learning platforms, government agencies, legislative bodies, banks, digital banks, financial institutions, digital platforms, and digital networks. Interaction and mutual influence of institutions and institutions of the digital economy form the guidelines for selecting effective elements of the institutional structure from alternative institutional forms. The digitalisation of Ukraine, which is focused on the norms of international, European and regional cooperation, will facilitate Ukraine's integration into the European and global market of e-commerce, goods and services based on information and communication technologies. A new global economic architecture is being designed, into which new economic agents are integrating. At the same time, regionalisation processes are taking place, new regional clusters are emerging, and the country is being integrated into the European cluster. Practical implications. The elements of the architectonics of the institutional environment of the digital economy sector are identified and summarised by criteria, which makes it possible to identify the most problematic areas of institutional transformations and to formulate and select instrumental solutions to overcome them. The development of the relevant elements of the institutional environment of the digital economy sector contributes to a rapid and profound digital transition, when the results of digital transformation will become the basis of Ukrainian society and a key factor on the path to Ukraine's prosperity and welfare. Value/оriginality. It is established that the use of institutional analysis tools will allow determining the optimal directions of institutional building/transformation of digital economy institutions and minimising the social costs of Ukraine's evolutionary development. A two-level approach to designing the institutional environment of the digital economy sector in the national space is proposed: at the institutional level – as designing the socio-political and economic conditions for the development of digital economy institutions based on the development of digital products and technologies; at the individual level – as designing the functional place of a digital product in the human life space.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
institution, institutional matrix, institutional environment, digital economy, digitalisation
Davis, L. E., & North, D. C. (1971). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, 283 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561078
Tkach, A., Kolomiiets, V., & Radieva, M. (2019). Institutional Platforms of the Transformation of the Economy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5(2), pp. 226–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-226-233
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. 317 р.
Blishchuk, K. М., & Domsha, О. V. (2020). Digital economy as a component of developmentof public administration system. Efficiency of Public Administration. Issue 4(65) Vol. 2, pp. 183–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33990/2070-4011.65.2020.226472
Donchenko, O. (2011). Basic matrices in management. Public management: theory and practice: the collection of scientific works of the Association of Doctors of Sciences on Public Administration: special issue. Kharkiv: DocNaukDerzhUpr. (in Ukrainian)
Chubar, O. H. (2013). Institutions and the institutional environment: theoretical generalisations of the principles of economic development. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University, Series "Economics", vol. 3 (40), рр. 98–104.
Tkach, A. (2007). Institutional economics. A new institutional economic theory. Kyiv: Centre for Educational Literature, 304 р.
Mantsurov, I. H. (2011). Institutional planning in the system of state regulation of the economy: a monograph. Kyiv: Economic Research Institute, 655 р.
Shaposhnykov, K. S. (2013). The influence of the institutional environment for the creative development of the regional economy. Naukovi pratsi Kirovohradskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 23, pp. 206–210.
Radieva, M. (2018). Institutional modernization of the global economy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4(5), pp. 283–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-283-290
Pokataeva, O. (2013). Innovative vector modernization of the national economy problems and resources. State and regions. Series: Economics and Business, vol. 3 (72), pp. 28–32.
Tkach, A., Radieva, M., & Kolomiiets, V. (2019). Institutional models of the new economy. Revista Espacios, vol. 40 no. 22, p. 29. DOI: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n22/19402229.html
Tkachenko, І., & Shtets, Т. (2021). Institutional providing of government control of development of sector of digital economy: necessity and directions of perfection. Market Infrastructure, vol. 59, pp. 23–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct59-4
Kraus, N. М., Goloborodko, О. P., & Kraus, K. М. (2018). Digital economy: trends and perspectives of the abangard change of development. Efektyvna ekonomika, vol. 1. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/1_2018/8.pdf
Castells М. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society. Malden (Ma.) Oxford: Blackwell Publ.
Digital Agenda of Ukraine – 2020. Conceptual framework (version 1.0). Priority areas, initiatives, and projects for the digitalisation of Ukraine by 2020. (2016). HITECH Office. December 2016. 90 p. Available at: https://ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf
Pustovarov, A. I. (2020). Theoretical foundations of the process of digital transformation of national economic development management. Black Sea Economic Studies, vol. 54, pp. 254–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.54-38
The World Bank Group (2016). Digital Dividends. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/896971468194972881/pdf/102725-PUB-ReplacementPUBLIC.pdf
Bodrova, D. V. (2019). Sharing economy institutions in the context of digital transformation of socio-economic systems. Intellect ХХІ, vol. 3, pp. 28–33. Available at: http://www.intellect21.nuft.org.ua/journal/2019/2019_3/4.pdf
Putsenteilo, P. R., & Humeniuk, O. O. (2018). Digital economy as the modern vector of reconstruction of the traditional economy. Innovative Economy, vol. 5-6, pp. 131–143.
Trokhymets, O. I. (2021). Digital innovations in the financial sector in the context of the development of ecosystems of national economies: investment platforms. ІІ International scientific-practical conference «Finance: theory and practice». National Aviation University. Kyiv: NAU, pp. 127–129.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.