ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY AS THE BASIS OF LEGITIMACY AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST IN WARTIME
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
One dimension of the Russo–Ukrainian war is the confrontation between authoritarianism and democracy in economic matters. Ukraine is currently engaged in a dynamic process of establishing the democratic legitimacy of public authority. This legitimacy requires public authorities to be economically efficient. This means that public authorities in Ukraine must ensure institutional stability and deliver effective governance. The legitimacy of public authority is a significant factor in achieving victory in wartime. The Russo–Ukrainian war is a convincing example of how resource mobilisation in wartime can only be achieved through societal unity and trust-based relations between the government and its citizens. Institutional trust arises from economic efficiency. War creates a situation that requires the stability of public institutions, as well as the ability to demonstrate economic effectiveness, mobilise resources, maintain public trust and ensure effective strategic management. Theoretical models of legitimacy, both classical and contemporary, need to be reconsidered in light of the specific economic processes that occur during wartime. Political democracy must be complemented by economic democracy. In wartime, the legitimacy of public authority is based on trust in key institutions such as the president, the government and parliament. While the government may resort to restricting certain democratic procedures in wartime (such as media censorship, banning threatening political parties and suspending elections), this should not undermine the fundamental principles of democracy and the rule of law. This article aims to determine the legitimacy of public authority under wartime conditions by examining the relationship between institutional trust and government economic performance. The focus of this paper is to define the economic efficiency of public authorities as the basis for their legitimacy and the trust placed in them during wartime. In the months following the outbreak of the Russo–Ukrainian war, public trust in most government institutions increased. This was driven by a recognition of the need for national unity in the face of an external threat. However, the level of trust in state institutions has declined over time compared to the first year of the war. While trust in many institutions remains higher than before the war, high levels of trust are primarily reserved for those directly responsible for the country’s defence, such as the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Guard, the State Border Guard Service and the Security Service of Ukraine. Trust in the President is higher than before the war, which is linked to his role as Supreme Commander-in-Chief. Trust in volunteer organisations and civil society, as well as in the banking system, has also increased since the war. Sociological studies consistently reveal an imbalance in institutional trust: the highest levels are found in the defence and security sector (the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the State Emergency Service, and volunteer organisations and defence formations), while political institutions of representation and governance (political parties, parliament, the government, the bureaucracy and the judiciary) are subject to chronic distrust. Between 2025 and early 2026, Ukrainian society will prioritise the state's economic effectiveness over electoral legitimacy.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
economy, politics, legitimacy, public authority, the Russo–Ukrainian war, institutional trust, elections, democracy, economic efficiency, the defence-industrial complex, international financial aid
Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Bomprezzi, P., Cherepinskiy, D., Irto, G., Kharitonov, I., Nishikawa, T., & Trebesch, C. (2025). Ukraine support after three years of war: Aid remains low but steady and there is a shift toward weapons procurement. Kiel Institute for the World Economy. https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/Subject_Dossiers_Topics/Ukraine/Ukraine_Support_Tracker/3rd_Aniv_Report.pdf
Buchanan, J. M. (2003). Public choice: Politics without romance. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 19(3), 13–18. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.142557732921230
Center for Economic Strategy. (2022, April 11). Economy during the war: Operational policy. https://ces.org.ua/ua-economy-in-war/
Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley & Sons.
Edgar, A. (2005). Legitimation crisis. The Philosophy of Habermas. Continental European Philosophy. Acumen Publishing, 102-137.
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2002). Principles of a liberal social order. In O. Protsenko & V. Lisovyi (Eds.), Liberalism: Anthology (pp. 19–32). Smoloskyp. [in Ukrainian]
Hladynets, N., & Kuzmenko, V. (2024). The state of Ukraine’s economy during a full-scale war. Economy and Society, (65). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-65-121
Hobbes, T. (2000). Leviathan, or the matter, form, and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil (R. Dimerec, V. Yermolenko, N. Ivanova, Ye. Miroshnichenko, & T. Oliynyk, Trans.). Dukh i Litera.
Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine. (2025). Ukrainian society: Sociological monitoring 2025. https://isnasu.org.ua/assets/files/monitoring/presentation_monitoring_2025.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2026, February 26). IMF executive board approves US$8.1 billion under an Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement for Ukraine (Press Release No. 26/066). https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2026/02/26/pr-26066-ukraine-imf-executive-board-approves-usd-8point1-billion-under-an-eff-arrangement
KIIS. (2025, August 6). Dynamics of trust in President V. Zelenskyy in 2019-2025. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1542&page=2&t=1
KIIS. (2026, January 19). Level of trust in public figures in Ukraine. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?cat=reports&id=1580&lang=ukr&page=1
Lipset, S., M. (1969). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Doubleday & Company. https://ia800602.us.archive.org/21/items/politicalmansoci00inlips/politicalmansoci00inlips.pdf
Locke, J. (2001). Two treatises of government (O. Terekh & R. Dimerec, Trans.). Solomiia Pavlychko “Osnovy” [in Ukrainian].
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023, January 3). State budget 2022: General fund of state budget received UAH 1,491 billion of revenues. https://mof.gov.ua/en/news/derzhbiudzhet-2022_do_zagalnogo_fondu_nadiishlo_1491_trln_griven-3790
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2025, September 20). Minister of finance discussed Ukraine’s budget support with partners in Copenhagen: In 2025 Ukraine has already raised over $30 billion. https://mof.gov.ua/en/news/minister_of_finance_discussed_ukraines_budget_support_with_partners_in_copenhagen_in_2025_ukraine_has_already_raised_over_30_billion-5335
National Bank of Ukraine. (2024). Annual report 2023: Financial fortress. https://bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/annual_report_2023.pdf [in Ukrainian]
National Bank of Ukraine. (2025, January). Inflation report. https://bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/IR_2025-Q1.pdf
National Bank of Ukraine. (2026, January). Inflation report. https://bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/IR_2026-Q1.pdf
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Popper, K. (1994). The open society and its enemies: Vol. I. In the grip of Plato’s spells (O. Kovalenko, Trans.). Osnovy.
Proleev, S. (2013). Conditions of legitimizing discourse and the ubiquity of coercion. Philosophical Thought, (2), 5–9. https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/208/210
Razumkov Centre. (2021, December 28). Ukraine without politicians and elections without politicians (December 21). https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/ukraina-bez-politykiv-i-vybory-bez-politykiv
Razumkov Centre. (2024а, February 21). Assessment of the economic situation, social well-being of citizens, belief in victory (January 2024). https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/otsinka-sytuatsii-v-ekonomichnii-sferi-sotsialne-samopochuttia-gromadian-vira-v-peremogu
Razumkov Centre. (2024b, November 6). Citizens' evaluations of the social and economic situation and the related public policies, social well-being of citizens (September 2024). https://razumkov.org.ua/en/research-areas/surveys/citizens-evaluations-of-the-social-and-economic-situation-and-the-related-public-policies-social-well-being-of-citizens-september-2024
Razumkov Centre. (2025а, March 26). Assessment of the situation in the country, trust in social institutions, politicians, officials and public figures, attitude to elections during the war, belief in victory (February–March 2025). https://razumkov.org.ua/en/sociology/press-releases/assessment-of-the-situation-in-the-country-trust-in-social-institutions-politicians-officials-and-public-figures-attitude-to-elections-during-the-war-belief-in-victory-february-march-2025
Razumkov Centre. (2025b, December 20). Assessment of the situation in the country, trust in social institutes, assessment of problems faced by Ukrainian society (November 2025). https://razumkov.org.ua/en/research-areas/surveys/assessment-of-the-situation-in-the-country-trust-in-social-institutes-assessment-of-problems-faced-by-the-ukrainian-society-november-2025
Rosanvallon, P. (2009). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity (E. Maricheva, Trans.) Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Press.
Rothstein, B. (2021). Quality of government: Theory and conceptualization. In A. Bågenholm, M. Bauhr, M. Grimes, & B. Rothstein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the quality of government (pp. 3–25). Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2005). The social contract, democracy, and representation. In O. Protsenko & V. Lisovyi (Eds.), Democracy: Anthology (pp. 237–247). Smoloskyp.
Trebesch, C., & Nishikawa, T. (2026, February). Europe steps up: Ukraine support after four years of war (Kiel Policy Brief No. 203). Kiel Institute for the World Economy. https://www.kielinstitut.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-import/dd24a73f-4270-46c5-9c40-bcc9df4f1672-KPB2023_EN.pdf
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
Weber, M. (1998). Sociology: General historical analyses (O. Pohorilyi, Trans.) Osnovy. http://litopys.org.ua/weber/wbs07.htm
Yakovleva, L. I. (2020). Legitimacy of public authority: Receptions and innovations OLDI-PLUS.
Yakovleva, L. I. (2025). The role of public opinion in the process of social changes. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology. № 56. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v056.2025.49
Yakovlev D. V., Yakovleva L. I. (2025). Public opinion in management: psychology of influence. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology. № 57. https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v057.2025.37
Yurchyshyn, V. (2022). Comments on macroeconomic forecast. Razumkov Centre. https://razumkov.org.ua/images/2022/09/07/2022_ANALIT_ZAPIS_Yurchyshyn_7.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.