HUMAN RIGHTS AND ETHICS IN AI-DRIVEN STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS: RISKS, MITIGATION, AND PROTOCOLS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into strategic communications offers significant opportunities but also poses complex ethical challenges. This study examines the ethical and human rights implications of AI-driven systems used for disseminating information, making decisions and engaging with audiences. Key risks identified include algorithmic opacity, bias and discrimination, misinformation, privacy violations, the manipulation of public opinion and security threats. These risks have the potential to undermine social trust, democratic processes and individual autonomy. A two-stage methodological framework is employed, combining a theoretical risk assessment based on digital ethics, human rights theory and socio-technical analysis, with a technical evaluation using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks. The first stage categorises ethical risks, and the second stage uses machine learning techniques to detect and quantify these risks in textual communication. The study also looks at ways to reduce the risk, such as Explainable AI, human oversight, testing for bias, monitoring content, and creating regulatory frameworks. This shows that AI can be both a source of risk and a tool for ethical governance. The findings highlight the importance of integrating ethical principles, human rights considerations and robust governance mechanisms into the deployment of AI in strategic communications. Combining technological solutions with organisational policies and human oversight enables AI to enhance communication efficiency and innovation, while safeguarding individual rights, promoting trust and supporting democratic and social integrity.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
ethical risks, algorithmic bias, misinformation detection, AI governance, human oversight, neural networks, strategic communication
Goldfarb, A. (2024). Pause artificial intelligence research? Understanding AI policy challenges. Canadian Journal of Economics, 57(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12705
Bekar, C., Carlaw, K., & Lipsey, R. (2018). General purpose technologies in theory, application and controversy: a review. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0546-0
Qian, Y., Siau, K. L., & Nah, F. F. (2024). Societal impacts of artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and governance issues. Societal Impacts, 3, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCIMP.2024.100040a
Horvitz, E., Conitzer, V., McIlraith, S., & Stone, P. (2024). Now, Later, and Lasting: 10 Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice. Communications of the ACM, 67(6), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637866
Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2024). Generative AI Requires Broad Labor Policy Considerations. Communications of the ACM, 67(8), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637864/ASSET/5FB620B0-5F2E-4FFE-992A6844360C94D4/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/3637864_FIG01H.JPG
Ulnicane, I., & Erkkilä, T. (2023). Politics and policy of Artificial Intelligence. Review of Policy Research, 40(5), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12574
Walter, Y. (2024). Managing the race to the moon: Global policy and governance in Artificial Intelligence regulation—A contemporary overview and an analysis of socioeconomic consequences. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4:1, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44163-024-00109-4
Douglas, D.M., Lacey, J. & Howard, D. Ethical risk for AI. AI Ethics 5, 2189–2203 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00549-9
Matthew G. Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Brian Jackson, Octavia Palmer, Shyam Visweswaran, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mustafa Deebajah, Hooman H. Rashidi, Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning, Modern Pathology, Volume 38, Issue 3, 2025, 100686, ISSN 0893-3952, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686
Stockman, C. (2024). Generative AI and the Ethical Risks Associated with Human-Computer Symbiosis. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/5.1.2
Platform Kaggle. https://Kaggle.com

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.