ESG DIPLOMACY AND NEGOTIATIONS IN THE DIMENSIONS OF A COMPETITIVE WORLD ORDER

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Oct 14, 2026

  Alina Bokhan

Abstract

The purpose of the article is twofold: firstly, to study modern aspects of the development of ESG diplomacy as an important tool of geopolitics; and secondly, to intensify international negotiations for the implementation of sustainable development goals. The contemporary paradigm of international interaction encompasses the integration of sustainable development diplomacy, environmental diplomacy and corporate diplomacy, with the objective of enhancing the resilience of economic systems. The sustainable development goals require new mechanisms for reaching compromises and making decisions within the framework of multi-level negotiation processes in a competitive world order. The subject of the study is ESG diplomacy and negotiations in a competitive world order. These present the mechanisms by which a modern system of international interaction and global regulation is formed. The research premises were determined by reviewing the transformation of the economic globalisation environment, the institutionalisation of ESG and sustainable development, the expansion of the subject field of international negotiations, the change in strategies and tactics of market actors' behaviour, and the integration of various types of diplomatic activity. Methodology. The study was based on the systematisation of scientific approaches to ESG diplomacy, as well as the definition of its role in international economic relations. In the context of identifying the interrelationship of environmental, social, managerial and diplomatic factors in the development of international co-operation, a new view is proposed. The systemic approach adopted substantiates the importance of developing ESG diplomacy as a comprehensive tool for reconciling economic, political and public interests. Results. ESG diplomacy is defined as a multi-level system of international coordination that integrates sustainable development values and standards into foreign policy instruments, international negotiations and economic partnerships. It contributes to changing the architecture of the competitive world order, building public trust and promoting responsible global governance. Practical implementation. It has been noted that Ukraine’s ESG diplomacy is of great importance for safeguarding national economic interests, fostering international dialogue in the context of European integration and post-war reconstruction. On Ukraine’s agenda are: European integration, ESG harmonisation, attracting ESG investment, ‘green’ financing, ESG-based reform of Ukraine’s reconstruction, coordination of partners’ and donors’ actions in the ESG sphere, integration of ESG criteria into negotiation processes with international partners, promotion of the Ukrainian ESG brand on global markets, and so forth. Value/Originality. The significance of ESG diplomacy as a form of international interaction and a new dimension of the economisation of diplomacy has been demonstrated. This broadens the scope of theoretical and practical research into international economic, political and diplomatic processes. The proposed approach enables the interpretation of the world order as a contested and competitive arena for the establishment of global regulations. The convergence of SD and ESG approaches forms the basis of the logic of global regulation.

How to Cite

Bokhan, A. (2026). ESG DIPLOMACY AND NEGOTIATIONS IN THE DIMENSIONS OF A COMPETITIVE WORLD ORDER. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(4), 401-406. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-4-401-406
Article views: 14 | PDF Downloads: 8

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

ESG diplomacy, sustainable development, international negotiations, global governance, geopolitics, adaptive capacity

References

Borrás, S., Haakonsson, S., Hendriksen, C., et al. (2024). The transformative capacity of public sector organisations in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 53, Article 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100904

Brown, L. R. (2001). Eco-economy: Building an economy for the Earth. W. W. Norton & Company.

Dunning, J. H. (2003). Making globalization good: The moral challenges of global capitalism. Oxford University Press.

Goldsmith, E. (1996). The way: An ecological world-view. University of Georgia Press.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/

Lake, D. A. (2026). The end of the liberal international order? Globalization, deep contestation, and the future. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 19(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaf016

Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. DRIFT. http://transitionacademy.nl/content/uploads/2017/10/1-Sustainability-Transitions-Research-Loorbach-.pdf

Lutak, O., & Baula, O. (2026). Index of global diplomacy as a basis for the conceptual design of an offensive model of economic interaction and integration of countries. Actual Problems of Sustainable Development, 3(5), 225–231.

Matschoss, K., & Repo, P. (2020). Forward-looking network analysis of ongoing sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288

Mazaraki, A., & Bokhan, A. (2022). Economic and environmental diplomacy: Strategic context of development. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 2, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2022(121)01

Moomaw, W., Bhandary, R., Kuhl, L., & Verkooijen, P. (2016). Sustainable development diplomacy: Diagnostics for the negotiation and implementation of sustainable development. Global Policy, 8(1), 73–81.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Global corporate sustainability report 2025. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/10/global-corporate-sustainability-report-2025_57b105f2/bc25ce1e-en.pdf

Sacco, P. L., Arenas, A., & De Domenico, M. (2022). The resilience of the multirelational structure of geopolitical treaties is critically linked to past colonial world order and offshore fiscal havens. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.00618

Sachs, J. D. (2020). Sustainable development report (annual series). Cambridge University Press.

Sustainability Transitions Research Network. (n.d.). Sustainability Transitions Research Network. https://www.transitionsnetwork.org

Tänzler, D., Rüttinger, B., Wenske, J., et al. (2020). The geopolitics of decarbonisation: Reshaping European foreign relations. Adelphi research gGmbH. https://climate-diplomacy.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/The_Geopolitics_of_Decarbonisation_Report_5MB.pdf

United Nations Development Programme. (n.d.). The climate dictionary: An everyday guide to climate change. https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/climate-dictionary-everyday-guide-climate-change

United Nations Environment Programme (2017). Multilateral environmental diplomacy and negotiations. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/multilateral-environmental-diplomacy-and-negotiations

United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Vyhovska, O. (2023). Theory and practice of international negotiations: Teaching and methodological manual. Kyiv: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University.

Wojczewski, T. (2018). Global power shifts and world order: The contestation of Western discursive hegemony. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1476464

World Economic Forum. (2026). Global risks report 2026. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2026/in-full/