Svitlana Tkalenko

  Tetyana Melnyk

  Liudmyla Kudyrko


The purpose of the study is to assess the relationship between Ukraine's foreign trade and its major macroeconomic indicators in the context of deepening globalization processes and increasing dependence of national economic development on exogenous determinants. In order to achieve this goal, the most important factors of influence of macro level on the scale of foreign trade turnover have been selected, the interval of observations has covered 1999-2018. Authors used the method of economic and mathematical modeling based on the E-Views software. A multifactor regression model has been constructed, tested for autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity; causal effects have been identified between foreign trade and the main macroeconomic indicators of combinatorial nature (both exogenous and endogenous), Ukraine’s foreign trade volumes has been forecasted up to 2023. Methodology. The study is based on the analyzed macroeconomic indicators for the period of 1999-2018, which made it possible to select those that showed up greatest impact on foreign trade. The results of the conducted modeling showed: high level achievement of foreign trade dynamics of Ukraine over the mentioned years, which exceeded similar indicators of dynamics of global trade; strong link between foreign trade, foreign direct investment and employment; revealing of a significant influence upon foreign trade of innovative activity of national business in industry as a dominant segment of the foreign sector of the country. As conclusions, the authors formulated a thesis on the need to strengthen institutional support for innovation and investment activities of national enterprises as a driver for scale-up and improvement of quality of Ukraine's trade relations with the entire world. It is determined that the multiplicative interaction of innovation and investment would diversify and complicate the commodity structure of exports, increase the level of its technological and innovative nature, and thus it is to allow to get rid of the established attitude to Ukraine on the trading map of the world as a supplier of low-tech raw materials. Practical implications. The main theoretical propositions, the authors’ conclusions presented in the article, are supposed to form a methodological basis for expert evaluation in substantiating the priorities of the state policy modernization regarding conditions and factors promoting the export-oriented sectors of the national economy. Value/originality. Prospects for further research in this sphere may be to assumed onto making an assess on risks (threats) and macroeconomic effects of foreign trade deterioration in the context of declining economic activity regarding importing countries of their domestic products, especially in the EU and the PRC, further weakening of external channels of investment and reducing the ability of businesses to innovate in deepening recessionary processes on the global and national levels.

How to Cite

Tkalenko, S., Melnyk, T., & Kudyrko, L. (2020). MACROECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE’S FOREIGN TRADE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(3), 143-155.
Article views: 45 | PDF Downloads: 31



effect of foreign trade, foreign direct investment, innovation, export-import, trade policy, economic growth


Constantinescu, Cristina, Aaditya Mattoo and Michele Ruta (2014). Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural? IMF Working Paper, January 2015. Retrieved 15 March, 2020 from:

Economic trends / Trade Trends / Exports and imports of total services, goods, value, shares, and growth, annual (2018). Retrieved 10 March, 2020 from:

Economic statistics / International economic activity and balance of payments (2020) Retrieved 05 March, 2020 from:

Sook-Yen, Lee and Chin Mui-Yin (2018). Revising the Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Growth International Academic Journal of Accounting and Financial Management Volume 5, Issue 2, 2018. Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from:

Razin A., Sadka E., & Coury T. (2003). Trade Openness, Investment Instability and Terms-of-Trade Volatility. Journal of International Economics, vol. 61(2), pp. 285–306. doi:

Ceyhun Akarsu (2018). Globalization’s effect on United States’. Terms of Trade Retrieved 09 March, 2020 from:

Eglantina, H., & Oltiana, N. (2016). Trade effect on economic growth of Balkan countries Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from:

Engjëll Pere and Eniel Ninka (2017). International Trade in Western Balkan Countries: Analysis Based on the Gravity Model The wiiw Balkan Observatory. Working Papers November, 2017 Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from:

Chuhaiev, O. A. (2016). Efekty velychyny ekonomiky dlia mizhnarodnoi torhivli [The effects of the size of the economy on international trade]. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny, seriia ekonomichni nauky, no. 7. Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from:

Nwosa P. I., Saibu M. O., & Fakunle O. O. (2012). The Effect of Trade Liberalization On Trade Tax Revenue in Nigeria. African Economic and Business Review, vol. 10, no. 2. Retrieved 10 March, 2020 from:

Ejike, D., Arinze, A. S., & Chidi, O. F. (2018). Trade liberalization and economic growth in Nigeria: a cointegration analysis (1980-2015). IJRDO – Journal of Business Management, vol. 4, no. 5 (2018), p. 81–94. Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from:

Agbeyegbe, T., Stotsk, J. G. & Wolde Mariam, A. (2004). Trade Liberalization, Exchange Rate Changes and Tax Revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Paper WP/04/178. doi:

Alessia Campolmi, Harald Fadinger, & Chiara Forlati (2014). Trade Policy: Home Market Effect versus Terms-of-Trade Externality. Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), p. 92–107. doi:

Yanikkaya, Halit (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72: 57–89. doi:

Evaluating the Trade Effect of Developing Regional Trade Agreements: A Semi-parametric Approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, May, 2007. doi:

Mahadeva, R. (2007). New Evidence on the Export-led Growth Nexus: A Case Study of Malaysia. World Economy, 30(7), p. 1069–1083, July. doi:

Marilyne Huchet, Chantal Le Mouel, Mariana Vijil (2018). The relationship between trade openness and economy growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, Wiley, 2018, 41(1), pp. 59–76. Retrieved 15 March, 2020 from:

Economic trends / National accounts/ Gross domestic product: Total and per capita, current and constant (2010) prices, annual. Retrieved 10 March, 2020 from:

Ministry for Development of Economy / Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine (2020). Free Trade Agreements. Retrieved 10 March, 2020 from:

Duginets, G., Koval, V., Plekhanova, O., Antonov, A., &Petrova, M. (2019). On the supranational and national level of global value chain management. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability issues, vol. 6, nо. 4 ( June), pp. 1922–1937. doi:

Rating: Ukraine Credit Rating (2020). Retrieved 06 March, 2020 from:

Reitynhovoe ahenstvo prohnozyruet zamedlenye ekonomyky Ukrainy (2020). Retrieved 12 March, 2020 from: