A VALUE-ORIENTED POLYPARADIGMAL APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF TRANSFORMATION CHANGE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 2, 2020

  Ludmila Batchenko

  Maryna Dielini

  Liliia Honchar

Abstract

The purpose of the article is a theoretical, methodological, and practical justification for the introduction of a value-oriented polyparadigmatic approach to the development of management education. Methodology. Scientific analysis is carried out by an interdisciplinary system of methods: systemic philosophical analysis, structural functional method, generalization, modeling, and others. Results. The known methodological approaches to the formation of modern educational models of management training are considered; the essential concepts of educational paradigms are revealed and the necessity of their generalization is scientifically confirmed; the presence of values in each of them is established, which allowed to justify the polyparadigmatic approach to the development of management education. The most significant scientific results: the author’s definition of the concept “value-oriented polyparadigmatic approach” is proposed, which is based on the understanding of the need to integrate effective educational paradigms based on the correlation of their valuable component in the educational construct of polyparadigmatic approach to management personnel development; principles of valueoriented approach to management activity (the principle of cognitive integrity; methodology; national orientation; axiological mediation; feasibility; polysubjectivity; the principle of statehood; scientific) is defined, the effectiveness of which ensures the complexity of their use at any level of management; axiological functions of the modern education system (ecological, humanistic, cultural heritage, creative, developmental, adaptive) are substantiated, which include certain axiological attitudes, affect the value aspects of training and education of the future manager and are important for the educational system, society, state, individual people in the present and will remain relevant for the future; a matrix of valuable orientations of the subjects of managerial activity is formed, which, according to the functional approach, has generalized the key parameters of determining the bank of competencies of managers. The practical significance of the study is in expanding and supplementing the theoretical and applied knowledge of management; in the possibility to apply knowledge in the educational process in the implementation of a value-oriented polyparadigmatic approach to management education; in use in the preparation of new regulatory and methodological documents on higher management education. Value/originality. The originality of the scientific research is represented by a fundamentally new combination (set) of methodological tools that ensure the uniqueness and value of scientific research.

How to Cite

Batchenko, L., Dielini, M., & Honchar, L. (2020). A VALUE-ORIENTED POLYPARADIGMAL APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF TRANSFORMATION CHANGE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(5), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-5-42-53
Article views: 411 | PDF Downloads: 419

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

axiology, value-oriented approach, methodological approach, paradigm, polyparadigmatic approach, manager, managerial education

References

Adizes, І. (2018). Insights on Management: vol. III. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Insights-Management-Dr-Ichak-Adizes/dp/0937120405 (accessed June 20, 2020).

Ananev, B. G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniia [Man as a subject of cognition]. Leningrad: Leningrad State University. (in Russian)

Bakhtin, M. K. (1985). Filosofiia postupka [Philosophy of action]. Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Technology. Moscow. (in Russian)

Baidenko, V. I. (2004). Kompetentcii v professionalnom obrazovanii (k osvoeniiu kompetentnogo podkhoda) [Competence in vocational education (to the development of a competent approach) ]. Hanging education in Russia, no. 11, pp. 3–13. (in Russian)

Berdiaev, N. A. (1993). O naznachenii cheloveka [On the appointment of a person]. Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)

Bibler, V. S. (1991). Ot naukoucheniia – k logike kultury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniia v dvadtcat pervyi vek [From Science Teaching – to the Logic of Culture: Two Philosophical Introductions to the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow: Izd. Polit. Literatury. (in Russian)

Bohoiavlenska, O. V. (2004). Prakseolohiia u systemakh suchasnoho menedzhmentu [Praxeology in modern management systems]. Scientific works of ONAZ named after O.S. Popova, no. 3, pp. 107–109. (in Ukrainian)

Bohuslavskyi, M. V. (1999). Struktura suchasnoho istoryko-pedahohichnoho znannia [The structure of modern historical and pedagogical knowledge]. The path of education, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 37–40. (in Ukrainian)

Bolotov, V. A., Isaev, E. I., Slobodchikov, V. I., & Shaidenko, N. A. (1997). Proektirovanie professionalnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia [Designing professional pedagogical education]. Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 66–72. (in Russian)

Bondarevskaia, E. V. (2015). Gumanisticheskaia paradigma lichnostno-orientirovannoi obrazovatelnoi sredy [The humanistic paradigm of a personality-oriented educational environment]. Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 11–17. (in Russian)

Borysenko, V. (2017). Intehrovane navchannia: tematychnyi i diialnisnyi pidkhid [Integrated learning: thematic and activity approach]. Available at: https://mozaikaped.blogspot.com/2017/08/integrovane-navchannjatematychnyj-i-.html?view=flipcard (accessed: June 15, 2020). (in Ukrainian)

Davydov, V. V. (1996). Teoriia razvivaiushchego obucheniia [Theory of developing learning]. Moscow. (in Russian)

Delors Jacques (1996). Obrazovanie – sokrytoe sokrovishche [Osnovnye polozheniia doklada ... dliia XXI veka] [Learning – hidden treasure [Report Highlights ... for the 21st Century]]. UNESCO. Available at: https://www.ifap.ru/library/book201.pdf (accessed: June 15, 2020). (in Russian)

Drobnitckii, O. G. (1966), Nekotorye aspekty problemy tcennostei [Some aspects of the problem of values]. The problem of values in philosophy. (chief ed. Kharchev A. G.) Moscow; Leningrad: Science, pp. 25–41. (in Russian)

Eroshenkova, E. I. (2016). Aksiologicheskie orientiry obrazovatelnoi realnosti: ot istokov k sovremennosti professionalnogo obrazovaniia [Axiological guidelines of educational reality: from the origins to the modernity of vocational education]. Gaudeamus, no. 4, pp. 9-14. (in Russian)

Flier, A. Ya. (2016). Sotciodinamika kultury: mnogoobrazie vozmozhnostei [Sociodynamics of culture: diversity of possibilities]. Culture of culture, no. 1. Available at: http://cult-cult.ru/sociodynamics-of-culture-a-variety-of-possibilities/ (accessed: July 20, 2020). (in Russian)

Hrishnova, O. (2001). Rozvytok vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini: tendentsii, problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Development of higher education in Ukraine: tendencies, problems and ways of their solution]. High school, no. 2-3, pp. 22–33. (in Ukrainian)

Ginetcinskii, V. I. (1989). Znanie kak kategoriia pedagogiki: Opyt pedagogicheskoi kognitologii [Knowledge as a category of pedagogy: The experience of pedagogical cognitology]. Leningrad, p. 87. (in Russian)

Honcharenko, S. U. (2001). Humanizatsiia osvity yak osnovnyi kryterii rozrobky zasobiv realizatsii suchasnykh tekhnolohii navchannia [Humanization of education as the main criterion of development of means of realization of modern technologies of training.]. Science. zap. Ser .: Ped. Sciences / Institute of Teaching Aids of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Kirovohrad. state ped. Univ. Vladimir Vinnichenko. Kirovograd, vol. 34: Means of realization of modern technologies of training, pp. 3–8. (in Ukrainian)

Gurianova, O. A. (2009). Sotcialno-psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie formirovaniia professionalnoi kompetentnosti budushchego spetcialista [Socio-psychological support for the formation of professional competence of a future specialist]. Proceedings of the Tekhnologii formirovaniia professionalnoi kompetentnosti budushchego spetcialista: mezhregionalnaia nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentciia [Technologies for the formation of professional competence of a future specialist: interregional scientific and practical conference] (Russia, Orenburg, March 16, 2009) (ed. Sergeeva N. A.), Orenburg: OGPPK, pp. 33–39. (in Russian)

Hamel, G., Breen, B. (2007). The Future of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Hamel, G. (2011). Menedzhment ХХІ veka: Novye otkrytiia [Century Management: New Discoveries]. Retrieved from: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/4246. (accessed July 18, 2020). (in Russian)

Hamel, G. (2009). Menedzhment 2.0: Novaia versiia dlia novogo veka [Management 2.0: A New Version for the New Age]. Harvard Business Review. Russia, no. 10, pp. 91–100. (in Russian)

Issledovanie tcennostnyi orientatcii M. Rokeach (2015) [Values List of M. Rokeach]. PSYCHOJOURNAL.RU is a popular scientific psychological portal. Available at: https://psychojournal.ru/tests/479-issledovanie-cennostnyh-orientaciy-m-rokicha.html (accessed: August 20, 2020). (in Russian)

Kagan, M. S. (1997). Filosofskaia teoriia tcennostei [Philosophical theory of values]. St. Petersburg: TOO TK “Petropolis”. (in Russian)

Kant, I. (2000). Krytyka chystoho rozumu [Critique of pure reason]. Filosofija: Khrestomatija [Philosophy: Reader]. Kamenets-Podolsky: Abetka, pp. 94–102. (in Ukrainian)

Khutorskoi, A. V. (2002). Kliuchevye kompetentcii i obrazovatelnye standarty [Key competencies and educational standards]. Internet magazine “Eydos”. Available at: http://eidos.ru/journal/2002/0423. (accessed: August 15, 2020). (in Russian)

Kiriakova, A. V. (2011). Tcennostnye orientiry universitetskogo obrazovaniia [Valuable landmarks of university education]. OSU Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 27–33. (in Russian)

Kolesnikova, I. A., & Titova, V. E. (2005). Pedagogicheskaia prakseologiia [Pedagogical praxeology]. Moscow: Izd. Tsentr “Akazhemiya”. (in Russian)

Kopylova, S. (2019). Tsyvilizaysiini vyklyky XXI stolittia: modernizatsiia profesiinoii pidhotovky mahistriv sotsialnoi roboty [Civilization challenges of the XXI century: modernization of professional training of masters of social work]. Social Work and Education. vol. 6, no. 3. Ternopil-Aberdeen, pp. 296–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2520- 6230.19.3.7. (in Ukrainian)

Kornetov, G. B. (2001). Itogi i perspektivy paradigmalnopedagogicheskoi interpretatcii modelei obrazovatelnogo protcessa [Results and prospects of paradigmatic pedagogical interpretation of models of the educational process]. Humanitarian science, no 1, p. 95. (in Russian)

Krainikova, T. S. (2017). Aksiolohiia [Axiology]. Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia [Great Ukrainian encyclopedia]. Available at: https://vue.gov.ua/Аксіологія (accessed: August 20, 2020). (in Ukrainian)

Kuhn, T. (1977). Struktura nauchnykh revoliutcii [The Structure of Scientific Revolutionary]. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)

Kuzmin, O. Ye. (2012). Kontseptsiia ta evoliutsiia protsesno-strukturovanoho menedzhmentu [The concept and evolution of process-structured management]. Economics: the realities of time, no. 2 (3), pp. 7–16. (in Ukrainian)

Kuzmin, O. Ye., Melnyk, O. H. (2007). Osnovy menedzhmentu [Fundamentals of management]. Kyiv: Akademvydav. (in Ukrainian)

Lapin, N. I. (2000). Sotciokulturnyi podkhod i sotcietalno-funktcionalnye struktury [Sociocultural approach and societal-functional structures]. Sociological Research, no. 7, pp. 3–12. (in Russian)

Leontev, A. N. (1996). Tcennost kak mezhdistciplinarnoe poniatie: opyt mnogomernoi rekonstruktcii [Value as an interdisciplinary concept: the experience of multidimensional reconstruction]. Questions of Philosophy, no. 4, p. 16. (in Russian)

Leontev, A. N. (2005). Deiatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Smysl, Akademiya. (in Russian)

Leontev, D. A. (1996). Tcennost kak mezhdistciplinarnoe poniatie: opyt mnogomernoi rekonstruktcii [Value as an interdisciplinary concept: an experience of multidimensional reconstruction]. Questions of Philosophy, no. 4, pp. 15–26. (in Russian)

Leontev, D. A. (2002). Metodika izucheniia tcennostnyi orientatcii [Methods for studying value orientations]. Moscow. (in Russian)

Martynyshyn, Ya. M. (Ed.). (2017). Obhruntuvannia Paradyhmy Menedzhment-Osvity u Sotsiokulturnii Sferi [Substantiation of the Paradigm of Management Education in the Socio-Cultural Sphere]. Bila Tserkva: Pshonkivskyi O. V. (in Ukrainian)

Maslow, A. H. (1999). Psikhologiia bytiia [The Psychology of Being]. Saint-Petersburg. (in Russian)

Maslow, A., Fadiman, J., Frager, R. (1995). Abraham Maslow i psikhologiia samoaktualizatcii [Abraham Maslow and the psychology of self-actualization.]. Khrestomatiia po gumanisticheskoi psikhoterapii [A reader for humanistic psychotherapy]. Moscow, pp. 111–150. (in Russian)

Merton, R. (1992). Sotcialnaia teoriia i sotcialnaia struktura. Sotcialnaia struktura i anomiia [Social theory and social structure. Social structure and anomia]. Sociological Research, no. 2–4. (in Russian)

Mintzberg, H. (1991). Strategic thinking as seeing. Nasi. Arenas of Strategic Thinking. Foundation of Economic Education. Helsinki.

Mukhina, V. S. (2005). Predislovie [Preface]. Mekhanizmy formirovaniia tcennostnykh orientatcii i sotcialnoi aktivnosti lichnosti [Mechanisms for the formation of value orientations and social activity of the individual]. Moscow: MGPI. pp. 4–7. (in Russian)

Nikandrov, N. D. (1998). Dukhovnye tcennosti i vospitanie cheloveka [Spiritual values and human education]. Pedagogy, no. 4. (in Russian)

Ovcharuk, O. V. (Ed.). (2004). Kompetentnisnyi pidkhid u suchasnii osviti: svitovyi dosvid ta ukrainski perspektyvy: Biblioteka z osvitnoi polityky [Competence approach in modern education: world experience and Ukrainian perspectives: Library on educational policy]. Kyiv: “K. I. S.”. (in Ukrainian)

Parsons, T. (2002). Poniatie kultury i sotcialnoi sistemy [The concept of culture and social system]. On social systems (eds. Chesnokova V. F., BelanovskiiS. A.) Moscow: Academic Project, pp. 693–776. (in Russian)

Ravkin, Z. I. (1995). Konstruktivno-geneticheskoe issledovanie tcennostei obrazovaniia – odno iz napravlenii razvitiia sovremenoi otechestvennoi pedagogicheskoi teorii. Obrazovanie: idealy i tcennosti (istorikoteoreticheskii aspekt) [Constructive-genetic study of educational values is one of the directions of development of modern domestic pedagogical theory. Education: ideals and values (historical and theoretical aspect)]. Moscow: ITOiP RAO. (in Russian)

Rickert, H. (1998). Nauki o prirode i nauki o kulture [Nature Sciences and Cultural Sciences]. Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)

Rozin, V. M. (1989). Spetcifika i formirovanie estestvennykh, tekhnicheskikh i gumanitarnykh nauk [Specificity and formation of natural, technical and humanitarian sciences]. Krasnoyarsk: Publishing house Krasnoyarsk. University. (in Russian)

Rusavska, V. A., Batchenko, L. V., & Honchar, L. O. (2018). Problemni Aspekty Menedzhmentu ta Menedzhment-Osvity v Umovakh Rynkovykh Zmin [Problem Aspects of Management and Education Management in Conditions of Market Change]. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series in Management of Social and Cultural Activity, no. 1, pp. 78–97. doi: 10.31866/2616-7573.1.2018.143391. (in Ukrainian)

Sergeev, I. S. (2004). Osnovy pedagogicheskoi deiatelnosti [Fundamentals of pedagogical activity]. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian)

Senko, Yu. V. (2002). Pedagogicheskii protcess kak gumanitarnyi fenomen [Pedagogical process as a humanitarian phenomenon]. Pedagogy, no. 1, pp. 14–15. (in Russian)

Serikov, V. V. (1999). Obrazovanie i lichnost. Teoriia i praktika proektirovaniia pedagogicheskikh sistem [Education and personality. Theory and practice of designing pedagogical systems]. Moscow. (in Russian)

Sharkovskaia, N. V. (2008). Sotciokulturnye instituty – deiatelnostnaia osnova sotciokulturnoi aktivnosti lichnsoti [Sociocultural institutions – the activity basis of the sociocultural activity of the individual]. MGUKI Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 149–152. (in Russian)

Shchedrovitskii, G. P. (1993). Sistema pedagogicheskikh issledovanii (Metodologicheskii analiz) [The system of pedagogical research (Methodological analysis)]. Pedagogy and Logic. Moscow: Kastal, pp. 16–201. (in Russian)

Shcherbyna-Yakovleva, O. (2017). Poniattia Sotsiokulturnoi Diialnosti: Filosofski ta Kulturolohichni Vymiry [The Concept of Socio-Cultural Activities: Philosophical and Culturological Dimensions]. Worldview – Philosophy – Religion, no. 12, pp. 71–78. (in Ukrainian)

Sobkin, V. S., Abrosimova, Z. B., Adamchuk, D. V., & Baranova, E. V. (2004). Proiavleniia deviatcii v podrostkovoi subkulture [Manifestations of deviation in adolescent subculture]. Psychological issues, no. 3, pp. 3–18. (in Russian)

Sorokin, P. A. (2017). Sotcialnaia i kulturnaia dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian)

Sorokin, P. A. (1992). Chelovek. Tcivilizatciia. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat. (in Russian)

Toynbee, A. J. (2004). Postizhenie istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow: Ayris-press. (in Russian)

Tugarinov, V. P. (1968). O tcennostiakh zhizni i kultury [On the values of life and culture]. Leningrad: Leningrad State University. (in Russian)

White, L. (2004). Izbrannoe. Nauka o culture [Favorites. The science of culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (in Russian)

Woodcock, M., & Francis, D. (1991). Raskreposhchennyi menedzher: dlia rukovoditelia-praktika [The Unblocked Manager: A Practical Guide to Self-Development] (Trans. in Eng.). Moscow: Delo. (in Russian)

World Economic Forum in Davos (2020). Pidsumky 50-oi Yuvileinoi Zustrichi [Results of the 50th Anniversary Meeting], Available at: https://www.rbc.ua/static/longread/davos_ukr/index.html (accessed: March 20, 2020). (in Ukrainian)

Yadov, V. A. (1977). Lichnost kak obekt i subekt sotcialnykh otnoshenii [Personality as an object and subject of social relations]. Sociology and modernity, p. 385. (in Russian)

Yalalov, F. (2008). Deiateklnostno-kompetentnostnyi podkhod k praktikoorientirovannomu obrazovaniiu [Activity-competence approach to practice-oriented education]. Higher education in Russia, no. 1, pp. 89–93. (in Russian)

Zimniaia, I. A. (2006). Kliuchevye kompetentcii – novaia paradigma rezultata obrazovaniia [Key competencies – a new paradigm of the result of education]. Internet magazine “Eydos”. Available at: http://www.eidos.ru (accessed: 15.07.2020). (in Russian)

Zeer, E., & Zavodchikov, D. (2007). Identifikatciia universalnykh kompetentcii vypusknikov rabotodatelem [Identification of universal competencies of graduates by the employer]. Higher education in Russia, no. 11, pp. 39–45. (in Russian)