INTELLECTUAL POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT IN FORMING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP OF SCIENCE-BUSINESS-EDUCATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Tetiana Shkoda

  Mariia Tepliuk

  Mykhailo Sahaidak

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to identify the components of the enterprise intellectual potential, which are promising areas of intellectual potential management that is the basis of a strategic partnership between business, science and education in the brewing industry of Ukraine. The novelty of the research is represented by the created theoretical model disclosing the specific advantages of such partnership for business, science and education in the context of intellectual potential management. The object of the scientific research is the process of the intellectual potential management and its role in forming strategic partnership of science-business-education. The research method includes the method of structural-logical analysis, the method of analysis and synthesis, the method of comparative analysis, statistical data and information analysis etc. The proposed algorithm for estimating the enterprise intellectual potential at the appropriate level of management includes ten stages, performing of which allows to get the calculated use level of the intellectual potential and its components: 1) providing the definition of generalized components of the enterprise’s potential and its important subspecies; 2) selecting and calculating the list of the indicators for defining the relative efficiency; 3) calculating the relative coefficients’ values for each enterprise considering average values in dependence of the type of activity; 4) aligning the contribution of the each subspecies of the potential; 5) calculating the efficiency coefficient of the consolidated relative use for each subspecies; 6) rationing the consolidated relative efficiency coefficient depending on their product; 7) calculating the potential share of each subspecies in the total value; 8) redistributing the obtained results by the components of the potential; 9) calculating the realized value of intellectual potential; 10) calculating the use level of intellectual potential and its components. The research is based on the Ukrainian brewing industry’s data for the period of 2016-2019. The obtained results highlight the most problematic components of the intellectual resources of the brewing companies in Ukraine such as "human resources", "technological resources" and "management resources". These components are recommended to be considered as the most promising areas of the intellectual potential development of the brewing enterprises in strategic partnership with educational and scientific institutions. The practical value of the proposed instruments for the brewing enterprises is in the use of the adapted graphanalytical model, which gives the opportunity to assess the structural components of intellectual potential of the enterprise and define the strategic directions of perspective partnership.

How to Cite

Shkoda, T., Tepliuk, M., & Sahaidak, M. (2020). INTELLECTUAL POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT IN FORMING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP OF SCIENCE-BUSINESS-EDUCATION. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(5), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-5-221-232
Article views: 41 | PDF Downloads: 19

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

intellectual resources, estimation algorithm, intellectual potential, management, strategic partnership, brewing enterprises

References

Adams, M. (2006). Intangible Assets, Tangible Risks. Options for Assessing Threats to Your Intellectual Capital. Risk Factor, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–4. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/126183/1/846567334.pdf (accessed 02 September 2020)

Andriushchenko, K., Stefanyshyn, D., Sahaidak, M., Tepliuk, M., Buchynska, O., Rozmetova, E., Marusei, T., Levchenko, Ia., Smyrnova, I., & Zhytomyrska, T. (2018). Process of resources provision management of the enterprise's activity with consideration of gender factor. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, vol. 6, no. 3 (96), pp. 6–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.150799

Baker, R. J. (2007). Mind over matter: Why intellectual capital is the chief source of wealth NJ.: John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Mind+Over+Matter%3A+Why+Intellectual+Capital+is+the+Chief+Source+of+Wealth-p-9780470053614 (accessed 03 September 2020).

Bashnyanin, G., Kutsyk, V., & Svidruk, I. (2019). The level of knowledge intensity of the country’s economic system. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-1-1-9

Beer Business (2019). Beer Market of Ukraine: companies and brands. Available at: https://www.pivnoe-delo.info/2019/11/09/pivnoe-delo-3-2019-rynok-piva-ukrainy-2019-kompanii-i-brendy/ (accessed 01 September 2020).

Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K., & Roos, G. (1999). The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 391–402. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v17y1999i4p391-402.html (accessed 06 September 2020).

Bounfur, A. (2003). The Management of Intangibles. The Organization’s most valuable assets. London: Routledge.

Boiko, T. L. (2014). Evaluation of the intellectual potential management efficiency with using graphical and analytical methods. Innovative economy, vol. 3, no. 53, pp. 367–372. Available at: http://ie.at.ua/IE_2014/InnEco_4-53-2014.pdf (accessed 10 September 2020).

Boiko, T. L. (2014). The Increasing Efficiency of Company’s Intellectual Potential Management. Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny, vol. 24.8, pp. 385–390. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvnltu_2014_24.8_63 (accessed 10 September 2020).

Brinkley, I. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy. The Work Foundation. Available at: https://www.secouncils.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/_publications/Defining_the_Knowledge_Economy_2007.pdf (accessed 04 September 2020).

Carayannis, E. G. (2004). Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. Nuclear Knowledge Management, vol. 1, no. 1/2, pp. 49–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNKM.2004.005102

Castro, G. M., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2012). Assessing knowledge assets in technology-intensive firms: Proposing a model of intellectual capital. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–59. doi: doi:10.7835/jcc-berj-2012-0066

Diefenbach, Th. (2006). Intangible resources – a categorial system of knowledge and other intangible assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 406–420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610681483

Edvinsson, L. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.

Emelyanenko, L., & Shkoda, T. (2016). Integration of science, education and production in synergetic paradigm of public management. MEST Journal, vol. 2(4), pp. 64–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.12709/mest.04.04.02.07

Fernandez, E. (2000). Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources. A resource-based approach. Technovation, vol. 20, pp. 81–92. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.2528&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 07 September 2020).

Grant, R. M. (2004). Cases to Accompany Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated, 392 p. Available at: https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/GrantContemporaryStrategyAnalysis/FIFTH_IM.pdf (accessed 06 September 2020).

Guthrie, J. (2000). The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital. London. Available at: http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Thought_leadership_docs/VisitingProfessor/tech_presnot_the_management_measurement_and_the_reporting_of_intellectual_capital_jul00.pdf (accessed 03 September 2020).

Harrison S. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital. Learning from leading companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010324124

Harris, M., Dopson, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2009). Strategic drift in international non-governmental development organizations – putting strategy in the background of organizational change. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, vol. 29(5), pp. 415–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.542

Hibbard, M., & Lurie, S. (2013). The new natural resource economy: environment and economy in transitional rural communities. Society & Natural Resources, vol. 26(7), pp. 827–844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.720358

Kuršvietienė, L., Stanevičienė, I., Mongirdienė, A., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Multiplicity of effects and health benefits of resveratrol. Medicina, vol. 52(3), pp. 148–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2016.03.003

Knight, J. F., Montalbn, A., & Schweber, N. (2016). Computable structures in generic extensions. Logic, vol. 3, pp. 814–832. Available at: http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/etd/ucb/text/Schweber_berkeley_0028E_16221.pdf (accessed 02 September 2020).

Mazur, I. (2014). Development strategy of partnership of higher education, science and business. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Economics, vol. 12 (165), pp. 6–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2014/165-12/1

Melnyk, L. (2018). The formation of the knowledge economy in the agricultural sector: theory, methodology, practice (The dissertation for getting a Doctor of Economics degree by specialty 08.00.03 – Economics and management of national economy). Uman, Uman National University of Horticulture; Mykolayiv: Mykolayiv National Agrarian University.

Peters, M. A., Besley, T., & Araya, D. (2014). The new development paradigm: Education, knowledge economy and digital futures. M. A. Peters (Ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

Tepliuk, M. A., Liezina, A. V., Zavyalova, M. V., Lysenko, N. S., & Yavorska, A. F. (2020). Valuable aspects in the enterprise management process. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, vol. 1(32), pp. 206–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i32.200371

Saaty, Th. L. (2017). The brain and mind as a system. Journal of Psychology and Cognition, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–112. doi: 10.35841/psychology-cognition.2.2.105-112

Salimova, T., Vatolina, N., & Makolov, V. (2014). Strategic Partnership: Potential For Ensuring The University Sustainable Development. Quality. Innovation. Prosperity. Vol. 18(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V18I1.320

Sánchez, M. P. (2000). Management of intangibles: an attempt to build a theory. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 312–327. Available at: http://capitalintelectual.egc.ufsc.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Intellectual_capital-2.pdf (accessed 03 September 2020).

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1964). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. Available at: https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2383164/component/file_2383163/content (accessed 03 September 2020).

Seleznova, H. (2019). Features of Strategic Partnerships in Modern Conditions of Business. Economics and Management of Enterprises, vol. 20, pp. 372–376. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2019-20-50

Smith, E. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 311–321. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8433/09e392e6a2144c41fa643e699c0ae2bb6a9f.pdf (accessed 03 September 2020).

Stefanita, A., Emelyanenko, L., & Shkoda, T. (2017). ICT impact on development of knowledge economy in Ukraine and Republic of Moldova. The Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov Days 2017: Proceedings, May 4–5, 2017, Budapest. Wien: Ӧsterreichische Computer Gesellschaft. Pp. 189–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.24989/OCG.V325.16

Stern, J. M. (2001). The EVA Challenge: Implementing Value-Added Change in an Organization. John Wiley & Sons, 256 p. Available at: https://books.mec.biz/tmp/books/ORBGSC4H3GLOK4IHHISQ.pdf (accessed 02 September 2020).

Stock market infrastructure development agency of Ukraine (SMIDA). (2020). Financial reports of brewing companies in 2016–2019. Available at: www.smida.gov.ua (accessed 01 September 2020).

Yamnenko, H. (2014). Stretegic Pertnership: Features and Competitive Advantages. Economy and State, vol. 2, pp. 26–29. Available at: http://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/2_2014/7.pdf (accessed 12 September 2020).