“NEW HOME” CONCEPT AS A PART OF HUMAN-CENTERED PEDAGOGICS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article explores the “New Home Concept” as an emerging framework within human-centered pedagogics, emphasizing the pedagogical value of supportive, emotionally resonant, and context-responsive environments. Drawing on contemporary insights from neuroarchitecture, environmental psychology, and community-based design, the study argues that the meaning of “home” extends far beyond physical shelter. Instead, it represents a multidimensional learning ecosystem that shapes cognitive capacities, emotional regulation, creativity, and social development. Based on the author`s experience and model of transforming houses into holistic, human-supportive environments, the article conceptualizes the home as a pedagogical space where learning processes are embedded in everyday spatial, sensory, and social experiences. The study analyzes four interrelated design principles (emotional resonance, functional harmony, community integration, and adaptive sustainability) as educational mechanisms that cultivate a person`s well-being, autonomy, and intergenerational interaction. Special attention is given to the needs of neurodiverse individuals, whose sensory and cognitive profiles require flexible, predictable, and inclusive environments capable of minimizing stress and enhancing learning engagement. The article further examines the pedagogical significance of natural elements, shared community hubs, and adaptive technological solutions, arguing that such components can function as catalysts for place-based and experiential learning. The “New Home Concept” is presented as an educational paradigm that repositions the living environment as a co-teacher: one that supports the development of personal competencies, social connection, and long-term well-being.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
neuroarchitecture; learning ecosystems; inclusive design; spatial pedagogy; community-based learning; well-being-oriented education; experiential environments
2. Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y. N., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Navarrete, G., González-Mora, J. L., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors. Cortex, 126, 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.009
3. Cook, A. (2024). Conceptualisations of neurodiversity and barriers to inclusive pedagogy in schools: A perspective article. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12656
4. Dwyer, P., Mineo, E., Mifsud, K., Lindholm, C., Gurba, A., & Waisman, T. C. (2023). Building neurodiversity-inclusive postsecondary campuses: Recommendations for leaders in higher education. Autism in Adulthood, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0042
5. Garcia-Lopez, C., Mor, E., & Tesconi, S. (2020). Human-centered design as an approach to create open educational resources. Sustainability, 12(18), 7397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187397
6. Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: A scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(6), 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062193
7. Houting, J. (2019). Neurodiversity: An insider’s perspective. Autism, 23(2), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318820762
8. Karpaviciute, E. (2025). Transforming houses into homes: Creating spaces that nurture human potential (pp. 32–46). In B. Tracy, E. Karpaviciute, & M. Zaki, Beyond walls: How to build communities that inspire connection and well-being. Brian Tracy Publishing / ProGrowth for Business Solutions.
9. Kostourou, F. (2019). Mass Factory Housing: Design and Social Reform. Design Issues, 35 (4): 79–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00567
10. Latecka, E. (2023). Humanising pedagogy: A politico-economic perspective. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2032653
11. Quigley, E., O’Hanion, M., & Gavin, B. (2024). Neurodiversity and third-level education: A lacuna between the strength-based paradigm shift and the lived experience. Neurodiversity, 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330241277427
12. Shen, T., Wang, J., & Fu, Y. (2023). Exploring the relationship between home environmental characteristics and restorative effect through neural activities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, Article 1201559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201559
13. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Palumbo, L., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Individual differences in preference for architectural interiors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101668
14. Watson, A., Lupton, D., & Michael, M. (2021). The COVID digital home assemblage: Transforming the home into a work space during the crisis. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27, 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211030848
15. Yao, W., Zhang, X., Gong, P., & Lu, Y. (2021). Impact of exposure to natural and built environments on positive and negative affect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 758457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.758457