MANAGERIAL “PROFESSIONAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT” CONCEPT IN EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES: ITS REINTERPRETATION IN MANAGERS` EDUCATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Feb 27, 2026

  Yana Levchenko

  Liping Tan

Abstract

The article examines how leading East Asian economies reinterpret and operationalize the idea of continuous personal advancement within managerial education systems. Drawing on comparative analysis of China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, the study explores the evolution of normative expectations regarding the personal growth of organizational leaders and the cultural-philosophical foundations that shape these expectations. Particular attention is given to traditional intellectual frameworks (such as Confucian moral cultivation, Japanese kaizen-oriented learning culture, Korean notions of self-discipline, and Singapore’s hybrid meritocratic ethos) that continue to influence contemporary approaches to leadership development. The article investigates how these countries incorporate self-directed growth into national training programs, corporate human-capital strategies, and state-supported professional-learning ecosystems. It highlights both convergent tendencies, including emphasis on lifelong learning, ethical conduct, and collective responsibility, and divergent national trajectories shaped by local institutional environments and socio-economic priorities. The comparative findings demonstrate that East Asian models conceptualise personal advancement not as an individualistic pursuit but as a socially embedded obligation linked to organizational excellence and national competitiveness. The article as well evaluates the implications of these interpretations for global management education, arguing that the East Asian perspective offers a distinct paradigm that integrates moral, cultural, and performance-oriented dimensions.

How to Cite

Levchenko, Y., & Tan, L. (2026). MANAGERIAL “PROFESSIONAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT” CONCEPT IN EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES: ITS REINTERPRETATION IN MANAGERS` EDUCATION. Academia Polonica, 73(6), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.23856/7320
Article views: 2 | PDF Downloads: 2

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

PR China, Japan, leadership cultivation, Singapore, South Korea, professional capability growth, human-capital development

References
1. Bedford, O., & Chua, S. H. (2018). Everything also I want: An exploratory study of Singaporean kiasuism (fear of losing out). Culture & Psychology, 24(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X17693831
2. Cheang, B., & Choy, D. (2024). Culture of meritocracy, political hegemony, and Singapore’s development. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 37, 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09458-x
3. Cheang, B., & Lim, H. (2023). Institutional diversity and state-led development: Singapore as a unique variety of capitalism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.07.007
4. Chen, T., Kung, J. K.-S., & Ma, C. (2020). Long live Keju! The persistent effects of China’s civil examination system. The Economic Journal, 130(631), 2030–2064. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa043
5. Dittrich, K., & Neuhaus, D.-A. (2023). Korea’s “education fever” from the late nineteenth to the early twenty-first century. History of Education, 52(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2022.2098391
6. Hennig, A., & Romar, E. (2023). Learning from Japanese businesses: Ethics in operational excellence. Humanistic Management Journal, 8, 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-023-00160-w
7. Jin, X., Xu, L., Xin, Y., & Adhikari, A. (2022). Political governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15, 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100236
8. Lee, C. (2023). Self-cultivation and inwardness: How to establish the Confucian identity in Korean Neo-Confucianism. Religions, 14(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030331
9. Lee, Y. M., Oh, I., & Rowley, C. (2025). Korean human resource management as number one: Lessons for the Asia Pacific. Asia Pacific Business Review, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2024.2389616
10. Lim, Z. Y., Yap, J. H., Lai, J. W., Mokhtar, I. A., Yeo, D. J., & Cheong, K. H. (2024). Advancing lifelong learning in the digital age: A narrative review of Singapore’s SkillsFuture programme. Social Sciences, 13(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13020073
11. Macpherson, W. G., Lockhart, J. C., Kavan, H., & Iaquinto, A. L. (2018). Kaizen in Japan: Transferring knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(3), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2017-0048
12. Macpherson, W. G., Lockhart, J. C., Kavan, H., & Iaquinto, A. L. (2015). Kaizen: A Japanese philosophy and system for business excellence. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(5), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2014-0083
13. Ottervik, M., Wang, H., & Li, Z. (2023). Operational dilemmas and cadre education and training at a county Party school in China. The China Quarterly, 258, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023001509
14. Saabye, H., Sanderhoff, S., & Hirsmark, O. (2024). The microfoundations of lean leadership: Monozukuri, hitozukuri and kotozukuri. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2349806
15. Shim, J., Park, Y., Chu, H.J., Choi, S.J. (2020). National Human Resource Development in Korea. In: Lim, D.H., Yoon, S.W., Cho, D. (eds) Human Resource Development in South Korea. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54066-1_2
16. Tan, V. P. L., & Liw, D. S. Y. (2022). Supporting workforce and company transformation through the labour movement: Company Training Committees and training and placement ecosystem. Singapore Labour Journal, 1(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2811031523000086
17. Tan, X., & Piao, L. (2025). How cadre training fuels grassroots cadres’ initiative to take charge: Evidence from Chinese government agencies. Asian Survey, 65(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2024.2409290
18. Vaszkun, B., & Saito, T. (2022). Confucius – A Chinese thinker still present in Japan’s business practices. European Journal of International Management, 17(2–3), 414–440.
19. Xiang, X., & Wang, H. (2024). Overcoming one-sidedness in cadre personnel management: Developing a competency framework for China’s central state-owned enterprise executives. Heliyon, 10(10), e31439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31439
20. Ye, R. (2021). Schooling for government: Institutionalised sponsored mobility and trajectories of public service scholarship recipients in Singapore (1979–2018). Journal of Education and Work, 34(4), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.1943335
21. Yoon, S. W., Lim, D. H., & Cho, D. (2015). Human resource development in South Korea. Human Resource Development International, 18(5), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1084129