LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND ITS PEDAGOGICAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 30, 2026

  Alla Nypadymka

Abstract

This study investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) by university students in foreign language learning, analysing usage patterns, perceived benefits and limitations, cognitive effects, and academic integrity awareness. A survey of 398 students at the State University of Trade and Economics revealed that 84% actively use LLMs, primarily for information retrieval, translation verification, and text editing rather than conversational practice. While students report reduced anxiety and improved access to learning support, concerning trends emerge: over half experience at least occasional emotional dependence on AI, and significant proportions report declining memorisation abilities and reduced speaking confidence. Students prioritise efficiency-oriented benefits over language-specific affordances, a pattern partly attributable to the challenging learning conditions caused by Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine. Notably, the overwhelming majority of students believe that LLM use should be regulated rather than forbidden, reflecting a broad recognition that these tools require structured institutional frameworks to be used responsibly and effectively. The findings underscore the need for clear ethical guidelines, responsible integration strategies, and assessment approaches that ensure LLMs enhance rather than replace the development of genuine language competencies.

How to Cite

Nypadymka, A. (2026). LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND ITS PEDAGOGICAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. Academia Polonica, 74(1), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.23856/7420
Article views: 15 | PDF Downloads: 16

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

artificial intelligence, EFL learners, academic integrity, language acquisition, AI dependency, ChatGPT, higher education, communicative competence

References
1. Aljohani, N. J. (2026). ChatGPT in language learning: A systematic review of applications and challenges. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102357
2. Bagni, M. (2025). Writing with a Reader in Mind: The Rhetorical Gap Between Genuine EFL Student Essays and LLM-Generated Essays. Iperstoria, 26, 114-140. https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2025.i26.1705
3. Banihashem, S.K., Kerman, N.T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4
4. Barrett, A., Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
5. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus. (2026). Artificial intelligent. Cambridge Dictionary. Accessed: January 22, 2026. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence?q=Artificial+Intelligence
6. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus. (2026). Large Language Model. Cambridge Dictionary. Accessed: January 22, 2026. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/large-language-model
7. Copeland, B. J. (2026). Artificial intelligent. Britanica. Accessed: January 22, 2026. https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence
8. Dahia, I., Belbacha, M., Yousfi, M. (2026). Reading Reinvented: The Role of LLMs in Developing EFL Students’ Reading Skills. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 10(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.5247
9. Holmes, W., Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
10. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
11. Kreijkes, P., Kewenig, V., Kuvalja, M., Lee, M., Hofman J. M., Vitello, S., Sellen, A., Rintel, S., Goldstein, D.G., Rothschild, D., Tankelevitch, L., Oates, T. (2026). Effects of LLM use and note-taking on reading comprehension and memory: A randomised experiment in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 243 (2026) 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105514
12. Liu, B. (2023). Chinese university students’ attitudes and perceptions in learning English using ChatGPT. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.145
13. Vieriu, A. M., Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
14. Wale, B. D., Kassahun, Y. F. (2024). The Transformative Power of AI Writing Technologies: Enhancing EFL Writing Instruction through the Integrative Use of Writerly and Google Docs. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024, 9221377. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9221377
15. Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the influence of large language models (LLMs) on English learners and their teachers. In A. Burns & W. Liu (Eds.), 6th International Conference on Informatization in Education, Management and Business (IEMB 2023). Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 27, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.54097/zghke663
16. Ye, E., Deng, J., Liang, Q., Liu, X. (2022). Using a smartphone-based chatbot in EFL learners’ oral tasks. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.299405
17. Zhang, A., Jiang, C. (2026). Beyond grammar checking: the impact of LLM-based instruction on writing strategies for self-regulated learning in EFL contexts. Cogent Education,13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2574333