FROM IDEAS TO STANDARDS: BORYS SHALAGINOV'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE FORMATION OF FOREIGN LITERATURE AS AN ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This article analyzes the significant contribution of the prominent Ukrainian scholar Borys Shalaginov to the development of normative documents for the school course of foreign literature in institutions of general secondary education in Ukraine. His key scientific positions regarding the course concept, principles of structuring educational information, and the role of the state standard and curricula are outlined. Particular attention is paid to Shalaginov's vision of the educational value of art as a means of affirming fundamental values that strengthen the human community. The article highlights his proposed principles for selecting works for school study, which include high artistic and aesthetic and pedagogical value, humanistic content, psychological appropriateness for specific age groups, scientific and theoretical representativeness, and a text volume suitable for classroom work. It is emphasized that these principles remain relevant today, especially with the deep penetration of digital technologies into schooling. The article also examines Professor Shalaginov's role in creating school curricula for foreign literature, which, unlike previous ones, fostered the formation of a personality rooted in national cultural heritage yet open to global ideas and values. It is proven that his programs created prerequisites for the synthesis of national and universal values. The conclusion is made that Borys Shalaginov's scientific and methodological ideas serve as a foundation for the further development of literary education in the New Ukrainian School
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Borys Shalaginov, state standard, literary education, teaching methodology, curricula, educational reforms, value-based approach
2. Zarubizhna literatura v shkoli (2003) [Foreign literature in schools. Round table materials]. Materialy kruhloho stolu. Slovo i chas. № 8. S. 45–66. [in Ukrainian]
3. Zarubizhna literatura: prohramy dlia serednoi zahalnoosvitnoi shkoly. 5–11 klasy (2001) [Foreign literature: programs for secondary schools. Grades 5–11] / avtory: B. B. Shalahinov, L. F. Miroshnychenko, O. O. Isaieva, Zh. V. Klymenko ta in. Kyiv: Perun, 112 s. [in Ukrainian]
4. Kontseptsiia derzhavnoho standartu zahalnoi serednoi osvity Ukrainy (1996) [Concept of the state standard for general secondary education in Ukraine]. (dodatok 1 do rishennia kolehii Ministerstva osvity Ukrainy vid 22.05.1996 № 8/3–6). Inform. zb. Ministerstva osvity Ukrainy. 1996. № 17/18. S. 7–11. [in Ukrainian]
5. Mykhalchuk, N. (2012). Psykholohiia chytannia ta rozuminnia literaturnykh tvoriv starshoklasnykamy [Psychology of reading and understanding literary works by high school students]. Kyiv: TOV firma “Prynt Khauz”. 368 s. [in Ukrainian]
6. Moklytsia, M. (2002). Osnovy literaturoznavstva [Fundamentals of literary studies]: posibnyk dlia studentiv. Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky. 192 s. [in Ukrainian]
7. Nalyvaiko, D. (2003). Zasadnychi pryntsypy u stvorenni prohram Basic principles in creating programs]. Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 3. S. 7–8. [in Ukrainian]
8. Pasko, I. (2024). Analizuiemo prohramy iz zarubizhnoi literatury dlia 5–9 klasiv: shcho zminylosia [Analyzing foreign literature programs for grades 5–9: what has changed]. URL: https://nus.org.ua/articles/analizuyemo-programy-iz-zarubizhnoyi-literatury-dlya-5-9-h-klasiv-shho-zminylosya/ (data zvernennia: 09.01.2025). [in Ukrainian]
9. Pasko, I. (2024). Yaki tvory z kursu “zarubizhky” naibilshe liubliat uchni – rezultaty opytuvannia vchyteliv [Which works from the foreign literature course do students like the most – results of a teacher survey]. URL: https://nus.org.ua/articles/yaki-tvory-z-kursu-zarubizhky-najbilshe-lyublyat-uchni-rezultaty-opytuvannya-vchyteliv/ (data zvernennia: 09.01.2025). [in Ukrainian]
10. Prohramy dlia profilnykh klasiv zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv z ukr. movoiu navchannia. Zarubizhna literatura. 10–11 klasy (2003). [Curricula for specialized classes in general education institutions with Ukrainian as the language of instruction. Foreign literature. Grades 10–11]. Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 7/8. S. 96–112. [in Ukrainian]
11. Svitova literatura Derzhavnyi standart zahalnoi serednoi osvity v Ukraini: osvitnia haluz “Slovesnist” (1997). [World literature. State standard of general secondary education in Ukraine: educational field “Literature”]. Kyiv: Heneza. Ch. I. S. 16–27. [in Ukrainian]
12. Sultanov, Yu. (2001). U poshukakh zasad, adekvatnykh shkilnomu kursu svitovoi literatury [In search of principles adequate for the school course in world literature].Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 5. S. 37–41. [in Ukrainian]
13. Shalahinov, B. (2000). Na osnovi dukhovno-tsinnisnoho pidkhodu [Based on a spiritual and value-oriented approach]: besida z kerivnykom avtorskoho kolektyvu ukladachiv proiektu novoi prohramy iz zarubizhnoi literatury, rozrobnykom yii kontseptsii kandydatom filolohichnykh nauk B. B. Shalahinovym Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 7–8. S. 32–35. [in Ukrainian]
14. Shalahinov, B. (2001). Osnovni pryntsypy ta pobudova shkilnoi prohramy [Basic principles and structure of the school curriculum]. Zarubizhna literatura i kultura. № 1. S. 5–8. [in Ukrainian]
15. Shalahinov, B. (2003). Naukovo-metodychna kontseptsiia kursu zarubizhnoi literatury u 9 klasi [Scientific and methodological concept of the foreign literature course in grade 9]. Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 3. S. 11–13. [in Ukrainian]
16. Shalahinov, B. (2008). Literatura – shkola – chytach: novi vyklyky [Literature – school –reader: new challenges]. Ukrainska mova y literatura v serednikh shkolakh, himnaziiakh, litseiakh ta kolehiumakh. № 9. S. 52–59. [in Ukrainian]
17. Shalahinov, B. (2013). Urok literatury: rozdumy literaturoznavtsia pro shkilnu metodyku [Literature lesson: a literary scholar's reflections on school methodology]. Kyiv: Hramota. 203 s. [in Ukrainian]
18. Shalahinov, B., Miroshnichenko, L. (2000). Pisliamova ukladachiv prohramy B. B. Shalahinova ta L. F. Miroshnichenko [Afterword by the program's compilers, B. B. Shalaginov and L. F. Miroshnichenko]. Vsesvitnia literatura v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. № 12. S. 10–11. [in Ukrainian]
19. Stepanenko, O., Bedzir, N., Demchyk, M., Cheypesh, I., Datso, O. (2023). Effectiveness of the development of critical thinking in the lessons of world literature in secondary school. Apuntes Universitarios. 13 (1). P. 398–414. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i1.1347.
20. Udovychenko, L. (2022). Formation of civic identity of students based on methodical heritage of Yevhen Pasichnyk. Porivnialno-pedahohichni studii. № 1 (43). S. 13–23. DOI: 10.31499/2306-5532.1.2022.258282.