LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT AS AN INSTITUTIONAL FACTOR IN THE RESILIENCE OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN WARTIMES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Mar 2, 2026

  Serhij Kramarenko

Abstract

Summary The article examines local self-government as an institutional factor in the resilience of territorial communities under wartime conditions. The study emphasizes that, during the fullscale Russian-Ukrainian war, territorial communities have become a basic level for ensuring public safety, access to essential services, social support, and the continuity of everyday life. The role of local self-government bodies is considered through their practical capacity to maintain municipal infrastructure, support healthcare, education and social protection institutions, organize assistance for internally displaced persons, and interact with military administrations, civil protection services, volunteer organizations, businesses, and international partners. The article identifies the main areas in which local self-government contributes to community resilience. These include ensuring the functioning of critical and municipal infrastructure, organizing basic services for the population, responding to security challenges and emergencies, restoring damaged facilities, mobilizing financial and humanitarian resources, developing international cooperation, and maintaining effective communication with residents. Particular attention is paid to the budgetary and financial dimension of local governance, the importance of humanitarian assistance, and the role of partnerships with the civil society sector and local businesses. It is concluded that the resilience of territorial communities depends not only on material and financial resources, but also on the quality of local coordination, the level of trust in local authorities, the availability of reliable communication channels, and the ability to unite residents around common tasks. Local self-government is therefore presented not merely as an administrative mechanism, but as a practical governance system that supports community functionality, social cohesion, crisis adaptation, and the foundations for post-war recovery

How to Cite

Kramarenko, S. (2026). LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT AS AN INSTITUTIONAL FACTOR IN THE RESILIENCE OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN WARTIMES. Academia Polonica, 75(2), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.23856/7514
Article views: 1 | PDF Downloads: 1

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

local self-government, territorial communities, community resilience, martial law, war, critical infrastructure, basic services, internally displaced persons, crisis management, post-war recovery

References
1. Hrabovets, I., & Chernous, L. (2025). Stratehiia kryzovoi komunikatsii u systemi «vlada-hromadskist » v umovakh voiennoho stanu v Ukraini: etapy, chynnyky, kharakterni rysy [Crisis communication strategy in the “government-public” system under martial law in Ukraine: stages,factors, characteristic features]. Grani, 28(1), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.15421/172526[in Ukrainian].
2. Lehkostup, I. (2025). Biudzhety terytorialnykh hromad v umovakh voiennoho stanu v Ukraini:problemy ta perspektyvy [Budgets of territorial communities under martial law in Ukraine:problems and prospects]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 82. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-82-14 [in Ukrainian].
3. Nakonechna, H. Ya., & Zinkevych, V. K. (2023). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Local self-government under martial law]. Istoryko-pravovyi chasopys, 21(2),43–48. https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-4544/2023-2/6 [in Ukrainian].
4. Steshenko, T., Matsnieva, O., & Shmyha, V. (2024). Komunikatsii ta vzaiemodiia mizh orhanamy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia ta hromadskistiu [Communication and interaction between local self-government bodies and the public]. Nauka i tekhnika sohodni, 4(32),126–140. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2024-4(32)-126-140 [in Ukrainian].
5. Chekhovska, I. V. (2025). Administrative and legal ensurance of access to medical care during the period of martial state. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 1, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-1/86
6. Lyndyuk, A., Boiko, V., Bruh, O., Olishchuk, P., & Rurak, I. (2023). Development of international cooperation of the borderline territorial communities of Ukraine with the EU countries under martial law. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(52), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.52.2023.4161
7. Nesterov, H. H. (2024). Some features of the exercise of local self-government powers by other legal entities. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences, 4, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.32782/tnu-2707-0581/2024.4/04
8. Oharenko, V. M., & Kolomiiets, O. V. (2025). Local government bodies: Their role in forming and implementing state policy in the sphere of construction. Scientific Notes of Taurida V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Public Administration, 4, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.32782/tnu-2663-6468/2025.4/11
9. Pyroha, I. S., & Pyroha, M. I. (2023). The role of local self-government in reconstruction under martial law. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 1(77), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.1.18
10. Sova, O. (2025). The impact of the commercial and civil society sectors on the socio-economic activity of Ukrainian communities. Demography and Social Economy, 1, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2025.01.003
11. Voznyak, H. V., & Koval, V. M. (2022). Local budget expenditures through the prism of the war in Ukraine. Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine, 2(154), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2022-2-2