NEO-ORWELLISM AS A THREAT TO GLOBAL DEMOCRACY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Sep 2, 2024

  Maria Bratasyuk

Abstract

The article highlights the problem of “neo-Orwellism” as a new form of dictatorship of state power over man. It is emphasized that neo-Orwellism is a system of methods, ways, means, etc., which are used by modern totalitarian power to subjugate a person and dominate him. Especially dangerous for the democratic world is Putinism, which has carried out largescale aggression against sovereign Ukraine, which has chosen a democratic path of development, and which now threatens aggression against the Baltic states, other sovereign EU states, Moldova, Georgia, etc. It is argued that Putinism, as a regime repressive against a person and a people, has its origins in the historical past of Russia, the imperial essence of which has been preserved to this day. It is emphasized that Putinists violate all international norms and principles, use especially cruel methods and ways to subjugate people: from fear and mass murder to nuclear blackmail. The Moscow Nazis are especially successful in using information bombing, myth-making, ignorance as a tool of subjugation, double thinking, language, etc. It is found that neo-Orwellism in the form of Putinism has spread very intensively in European countries and the United States. In these countries, a significant part of the population lives with private interest, indifferent to the fate of democracy and its values, partly unable to deeply understand modern international and domestic problems, therefore they are a good basis for the spread of neo-Orwellism

How to Cite

Bratasyuk, M. (2024). NEO-ORWELLISM AS A THREAT TO GLOBAL DEMOCRACY. Academia Polonica, 64(3), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.23856/6419
Article views: 1 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

neo-Orwellism, ruscism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, democracy, human rights, fear, blackmail, myth-making, double thinking.

References
1. Applebaum, Enn (2023). Pro smertelnu imperialistychnu ideyu Russii, naslidki kontrnastupu ZSU ta zakinczenna viiny na You Tube [Anne Applebaum on Russia's deadly imperial idea, the consequences of the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the end of the war on You Tube]. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/gOlgsH6g7OU [in English]
2. Bernard-Anri, Levie (2022). Pro rosiyski fascism, naivnist Macrona ta film «Slava Ukraini» na You Tube [Bernard – Henri Lévy on Russian fascism, Macron's naivety and the film “Glory to Ukraine” on You Tube]. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/Np5VfDAIlo0 [in English]
3. Bratasyuk, M. G. (2019) Smyslova zalezhnist vid mynulogo yak sotsiokulturna problema [Semantic dependence on the past as a socio-cultural problem]. M-ly nauk. konf. DuhovnIst. Kultura. Globalizatsiya (28 zhovtnya 2019, m. LvIv). Lviv : Gelvetika, 2019. 214 p. P. 24–28 [in Ukrainian]
4. Bratasyuk, M. (2021) Deyuridizatsiya suspilnyh vidnosyn yak ruynatsiya smyslovogo polya prava [Deuridization of social relations as the destruction of the semantic field of law]. Zdobutki kafedry teoriyi derzhavy ta prava NAVS. M-ly seminaru 26 bereznya 2021 r. Kyiv, 2021 [in Ukrainian]
5. Bratasyuk, M., Bratasyuk, V., Hryshchuk, O. (2022). Suchasny ukrainets yak sotsialny typ ludyny: pragnennya gidnosty ta «politica skryvdzenosti» (F.Fukuyama) [Modern Ukrainian as a social type of man: the desire for dignity and the “politics of resentment” (F. Fukuyama)]. Yuridichny naukoviy electronnyi zhurnal. 2022. № 12. С. 518–521. Ofitziynyi site: www.lsej. org.ua. [in Ukrainian]
6. Bratasiuk, М., Yaremko, O. (2023) The Rule of Law as a Principle of legal meaning: europenian and ukranian experience. PNAP. Т. 57. № 2. 2023. S. 131–139. [in English]
7. Dontsov, D. (2005). Dukh nashoi davnini. De sukathi nashikh istorich traditions. Dukh nashoi davnini. dukh nashoi davnini. de sukathi nashikh istorich traditions. dukh nashoi davnini. [Spirit of our antiquity. Where to look for our historical traditions. The spirit of our antiquity]. Kyiv : MAUP, 2005. S. 137–559. [in Ukrainian]