METAMODERN ETHICS AND THE FORMATION OF A EUROPEAN CULTURE OF TOLERANCE: CONTEMPORARY UKRAINIAN CULTURE IN A POST-TRAUMATIC CONTEXT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This article examines the transformation of humanistic values in contemporary Ukrainian culture through the lens of the metamodern paradigm and contemporary European studies of tolerance. The relevance of the study stems from the urgent need to reconsider traditional models of tolerance in the context of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, post-traumatic social transformations, the decolonization of cultural space, and Ukraine's integration into the European humanitarian community. The study aims to identify the conceptual foundations of metamodern ethics as one of the key mechanisms for shaping a new model of tolerance within contemporary Ukrainian culture. The research is based on an interdisciplinary methodology that combines hermeneutic, cultural-historical, comparative-typological, and axiological approaches with the theoretical frameworks of postcolonial studies, metamodernism, and contemporary European theories of tolerance. The article traces the evolution of European models of tolerance and demonstrates their methodological affinity with the principles of metamodern culture. It identifies the principal cultural markers of metamodern ethics in contemporary Ukrainian culture, including new sincerity, the ethics of care, social solidarity, post-traumatic embodiment, the decolonization of cultural memory, inclusiveness, responsibility, and critical hope. Using Iryna Tsilyk's poem Hamam as a case study, the article explores a literary model of negotiating the boundaries of tolerance, responsibility, memory, and encounters with the Other in the context of wartime experience. The scholarly novelty of the study lies in its proposed conceptual synthesis of metamodern theory and contemporary European studies of tolerance as an interpretative framework for contemporary Ukrainian culture. The findings demonstrate that Ukrainian cultural experience not only contributes to Ukraine's integration into the European humanitarian space but also actively expands contemporary understandings of democratic values, responsible coexistence, and humanistic practices of post-war recovery.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
humanistic paradigm; decolonization; European values; culture of equality; metamodernism; non-discrimination; zero tolerance; post-traumatic society; social solidarity; literary discourse, Erasmus Jean Monnet project.
2. Council of Europe. (2008). White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue: Living Together as Equals in Dignity. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/intercultural/source/pub_white_paper/white%20paper_final_revised_en.pdf
3. Council of Europe. (2024, October 15). Council of Europe Congress calls for partnerships to protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/-/council-of-europe-congress-calls-for-partnerships-to-protect-ukraine-s-cultural-heritage
4. European Union. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union: Article 2. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 17. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teu_2012/art_2/oj
5. European Union. (2016). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Article 22 – Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity. Official Journal of the European Union, C 202, 398. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2016/art_22/oj
6. European Union. (2016). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Article 21 – Non-discrimination. Official Journal of the European Union, C 202, 398. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2016/art_21/oj
7. Forst, R. (2013). Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051200
8. Forst, R. (2026). Toleration. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/toleration/
9. Galeotti, A. E. (2002). Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Metamodernist // Manifesto [by Luke Turner, 2011]. URL: https://www.metamodernism.org/
12. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, NY; London: Routledge.
13. Tsilyk, I. (2025). Tonkyi lid [Thin Ice]. Chernivtsi: Meridian Czernowitz.
14. Ukrainian Institute, ICOM UK, ICOM Ukraine, Museums Association, & British Council. (2025). Supporting Decolonisation in Museums: Focus on Ukraine. https://www.britishcouncil.org.ua/en/programmes/arts/ukraine-focused-decolonisation-guide-museums
15. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1995, November 16). Declaration of Principles on Tolerance. Paris, France. UNESCO Legal Affairs. URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-principles-tolerance
16. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024, June 7). Ukraine: Nearly 30 States pledge to support UNESCO's efforts in the recovery of the cultural sector. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ukraine-nearly-30-states-pledge-support-unescos-efforts-recovery-cultural-sector
17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d.). Ethics and Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/ethics-and-ich-00866
18. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024, February 29). UNESCO funds 14 new projects to support creativity in Ukraine. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-funds-14-new-projects-support-creativity-ukraine
19. Van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (Eds.). (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
20. Vermeulen, T., & van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2(1), Article 5677. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
21. Zembylas, M., & Bozalek, V. (2011). The Council of Europe's White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue: An analysis using the ethic of care. Policy Futures in Education, 9(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.1.13