INTERDISCIPLINARY TRANSFER FACTORS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIO-POLITICAL TERMS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Aug 10, 2026

  Natalia Kemska

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of foreign language borrowings that are actively used to create complex terms and term combinations in modern American socio-political terminology. The borrowing of a term is most often caused by the need to nominate a new concept or phenomenon when the recipient language lacks terms to denote its own nomination of a scientific reality. The socio-political terminology is a dynamic system in which conceptual meanings are constantly updated primarily through a permanent process of interlingual influences and borrowings. The dynamics of borrowings is manifested in the fact that they are in motion, change their meaning, become widespread in various fields, and enter into lexical and semantic relations with autochthonous terms. Interlingual contacts most clearly determine monocultural exchange and interlingual influences of professional terminologies. After all, any terminology can be both a producer and a recipient of international vocabulary, mainly from Latin and Greek classical languages. We believe that borrowings from other languages play a significant role in the process of internationalisation of socio-political terminology.

How to Cite

Kemska, N. (2026). INTERDISCIPLINARY TRANSFER FACTORS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIO-POLITICAL TERMS. Academia Polonica, 76(3), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.23856/7613
Article views: 3 | PDF Downloads: 1

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

interlingual borrowings, autochthonous terms, interlingual influences, lan- guage contact, source language, recipient language, professional terminology, heterogeneous formations.

References
1. Demchenko K. V. (2005) Funktsionuvannia inshomovnykh leksem u tekstakh publitsystychnoho styliu [Functioning of foreign lexemes in journalistic texts]. Kultura narodov Prychernomoria. № 69. S. 170–172 [in Ukraine].
2. Dudok R. I. (2017) Mizhmovni protsesy interferentsii v terminolohichnii systemi anhliiskoi movy [Interlingual processes of interference in the terminological system of the English language]. Terminolohichnyi visnyk. Vyp. 4. S. 129-135 [in Ukraine].
3. Fedorets S. A. (2005) Anhliiski zapozychennia u movi suchasnoi ukrainskoi reklamy [English borrowings in the language of modern Ukrainian advertising]: dys. … kand. filol. nauk. Kharkiv. 203 s [in Ukraine].
4. Haugen E. (1972) The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing. Ecology of language: Essays by Haugen. Stanford University Press. PP. 113–119 [the USA].
5. Honcharenko L. O. (2010) Funktsionalnyi aspekt zapozychen [Functional aspect of borroings] Aktualni problemy slovianskoi filolohii. Vyp. XXIII. Ch. 4. S. 294–300 [in Ukraine].
6. Kerpatenko Yu. V. Inshomovne slovo: vyznachennia, adaptatsiia, funktsionuvannia [Foreign Words: Definition, Adaptation, Functioning]. [Elektronnyi resurs] Rezhym dostupu: [http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/Nz/Fil/2009_81_1/statti/81.pdf)] [in Ukraine].
7. Kyiak T. R. (2006) Zapozychennia ta internatsionalizmy u fakhovykh movakh [Borrowings and internationalisms in professional languages]. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Rezhym dostupu: Http://eprints. zu. edu.ua/1068/1/06ktpifm. Pdf [in Ukraine].
8. Paul G. (2002) Principien der Sprachgeschichte., 1880. 10 vydannia: Tübingen, Niemeyer [in Germany].
9. Petryshyn O. M. (2018) Pro novitni anhlomovni zapozychennia yak zasib mizhkulturnoi komunikatsii [On the latest English borrowings as a means of intercultural communication]. Visnyk molodykh naukovtsiv. № 6. S. 135 [in Ukraine].
10. Pomirko R. S. (2010) Kohnityvni mekhanizmy transpozytsii smysliv: metafora ta metonimiia (na materiali anhliiskoi fakhovoi movy ekonomiky) [Cognitive mechanisms of transposition of meanings: metaphor and metonymy (based on the material of English professional language of economics)]. Visnyk Lviv. nats. un-tu. – Ser. Inozemni movy. Vyp. 17. S. 3–10 [in Ukraine].
11. Voitenko K. I. (2010) Klasyfikatsiia zapozychen v suchasnykh linhvistychnykh doslidzhenniakh [Classification of borrowings in modern linguistic studies] [Elektronnyi resurs] / Rezhym dostupu: http://www.rusnauka.com/7_NMIV_/Philologia/60103.doc.htm [in Ukraine].
12. Zatsnyi Yu. A. (2006.) Vnutrishni zapozychennia suchasnoi anhliiskoi movy [Internal borrowings in modern English]. Visnyk Sum DU. № 11. S. 28–29 [in Ukraine].
13. Zhluktenko Yu. O. (1966) Movni kontakty. Problemy interlinhvistyky [Language contacts. Problems of interlinguistics]. K.: Kyiv. un-t. 135 s [in Ukraine].
14. СОСА – Corpus of Contemporary American English. URL: https://www.englishcorpora.org/ coca/