PHONETIC PROCESSES IN THE HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE: MAIN TRENDS AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE PRESENT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article investigates the major phonetic processes that have shaped the English phonological system across its three main periods (Old English, Middle English, and Modern English) and traces the living consequences of those changes in contemporary standard pronunciation. The central argument is that English phonology is not a random accumulation of isolated shifts, but a coherent, systemic reorganisation driven by the interplay of internal phonological pressures and external socio-historical forces. The study analyses four processes: the Pre-Germanic consonant shift described by Grimm’s Law (c. 1st millennium BCE), the significant vowel shift of the Middle English period culminating in the Great Vowel Shift (c. 1400-1700 CE), the simplification of consonant clusters and the emergence of silent letters during the medieval era, and the phonologisation of fricatives triggered by Franco-Norman language contact after 1066. The methodology combines diachronic phonological analysis with elements of sociolinguistics and historical dialectology. The article argues that each major wave of change left sedimentary traces in Present-Day English: in the persistent mismatch between spelling and pronunciation, in morphophonological alternations visible in word pairs such as /naɪf/~/naɪvz/ or /ˈdɪvɪn/~/dɪˈvɪnɪti/, and in the ongoing simplification of the diphthong system recorded in contemporary Received Pronunciation. By foregrounding the cumulative, stratified nature of these changes, the article offers a theoretically grounded framework for understanding why modern English phonology is simultaneously conservative in its orthography and innovative in its spoken realisation.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
historical phonology, Great Vowel Shift, Grim’s Law, consonant shift, fricative phonologisation, Received Pronunciation, sound change, diachronic linguistics.
2. Cheshire, J., Fox, S., Kerswill, P., & Torgersen, E. (2008). Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica, 22, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484605299.1
3. Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
4. Cser, A. (2024). Reconstructing the historical phonology of Old English. English Language and Linguistics, 28(4), 751-789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674324000674
5. Dresher, B. E. (2018). Contrastive feature hierarchies in Old English diachronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society, 116(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12105
6. Fabricius, A. (2002). Weak vowels in modern RP: An acoustic study of happy-tensing and KIT/schwa shift. Language Variation and Change, 14(2), 211-237. https://doi.org/10.10170S0954394502142037
7. Hawkins, S., & Midgley, J. (2005). Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100305002124
8. Honeybone, P., & Salmons, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.001.0001
9. Kerswill, P., Torgersen, E. N., & Fox, S. (2008). Reversing “drift”: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change, 20(3), 451-491. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0954394508000148
10. Kytö, M., & Pahta, P. (Eds.). (2016). The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2018-0013
11. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
12. Labov, W. (2010). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327496
13. Minkova, D. (2014). A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14. Minkova, D., & Stockwell, R. (2009). English words: History and structure (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575938
15. Soroka, A. I., & Biletska, O. V. (2022). Fonetychni protsesy v konteksti rozvytku anhliiskoi ta nimetskoi mov [Phonetic processes in the context of English and German language development]. Aktualni problemy filolohii ta perekladoznavstva, 24, 160-163. [in Ukrainian]
16. Stenbrenden, G. F. (2022). Grimm’s Law and Verner’s Law: Towards a unified phonetic account. In B. Los, C. Cowie, P. Honeybone, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), English historical linguistics: Change in structure and meaning (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358, pp. 15-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.01ste
17. Wells, J. C. (2008). Longman pronunciation dictionary (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0025100309003934