CYBERSECURITY OF DIGITAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFRASTRUCTURE IN UKRAINE: A PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARD OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE INTEGRITY AND FAIR TRIAL
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The digitalisation of criminal justice has transformed the procedural environment in which evidence is created, stored, transmitted, examined, and challenged. In proceedings involving electronic evidence, evidentiary reliability increasingly depends not only on formal rules of admissibility and proof, but also on the cybersecurity of the digital infrastructure through which such evidence is handled. This article argues that cybersecurity of digital criminal justice infrastructure in Ukraine is better conceptualised not merely as a technical or organisational function of information protection, but as a procedural safeguard of electronic evidence integrity and fair trial. The article examines the procedural significance of cybersecurity safeguards for ensuring the integrity, authenticity, provenance, traceability, and verifiability of electronic evidence in Ukrainian criminal proceedings. It applies formal-dogmatic, systemic-structural, and limited comparative legal methods and analyses Ukrainian criminal procedure, legislation on electronic documents, electronic identification and trust services, cybersecurity regulation, selected doctrinal sources, European human rights standards, and international cybersecurity guidance. The analysis demonstrates that the integrity, traceability, and verifiability of electronic evidence increasingly depend on cybersecurity measures embedded within digital justice systems. Accordingly, Ukrainian criminal procedure should more clearly integrate cybersecurity safeguards into evidentiary handling, judicial assessment, and defence verification.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
electronic evidence, cybersecurity, criminal proceedings, evidence integrity, traceability, fair trial, equality of arms, Ukraine.
2. Council of Europe Cybercrime Programme Office. (2023). Electronic evidence guide: A basic guide for police officers, prosecutors and judges. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/ en/web/cybercrime/-/iproceeds-2-launching-of-the-electronic-evidence-guide-v-3-0
3. Council of Europe. (2019). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings. https://search.coe.int/ cm?i=0900001680902e0c
4. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, No. 4651-VI (2012, April 13). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17?lang=en
5. Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom, Applications nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, European Court of Human Rights. (2004).
6. European Convention on Human Rights. (1950). Council of Europe.
7. Figurskyi, V. M. (2023). Evidence in electronic form in criminal proceedings. Galician Studies: Legal Sciences, 4, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.32782/galician_studies/law-2023-4-14
8. Foucher v. France, Application no. 22209/93, European Court of Human Rights. (1997).
9. Guttman, B., White, D. R., & Walraven, T. (2022). Digital evidence preservation: Considerations for evidence handlers (NIST IR 8387). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8387
10. Hryshchuk, V. R. (2026). Elektronni (tsyfrovi) dani u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: vid elektronnoho slidu do dokazu [Electronic (digital) data in criminal proceedings: From electronic trace to evidence]. Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 93(5). https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2026.93.5.9
11. Jasper v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 27052/95, European Court of Human Rights. (2000).
12. Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., & Dang, H. (2006). Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response (NIST Special Publication 800-86). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-86
13. Law of Ukraine on Electronic Documents and Electronic Document Management, No. 851- IV. (2003, May 22). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
14. Law of Ukraine on Electronic Identification and Electronic Trust Services, No. 2155-VIII. (2017, October 5). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
15. Law of Ukraine on Protection of Information in Information and Communication Systems, No. 80/94-VR. (1994, July 5). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
16. Law of Ukraine on the Basic Principles of Ensuring Cybersecurity of Ukraine, No. 2163- VIII. (2017, October 5). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
17. Nazarko, A. (2023). E-evidence in Ukrainian criminal justice: Exploring the legal realities and theoretical perspectives. Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 80(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.80.2.28
18. Politova, A. S., & Chekhlai, T. O. (2025). Dopustymist tsyfrovykh dokaziv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: analiz sudovoi praktyky [Admissibility of digital evidence in criminal proceed- ings: Analysis of judicial practice]. Visnyk Mariupolskoho Derzhavnoho Universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 29, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.34079/2518-1319-2025-15-29-104-115
19. Predmestnikov, O. H., Tatarnikova, T. O., & Semeniuk-Prybaten, A. V. (2026). Pravove rehuliuvannia vykorystannia elektronnykh (tsyfrovykh) dokaziv u kryminalnomu protsesi [Legal regulation of the use of electronic (digital) evidence in criminal proceedings]. Akademichni Vizii, 54. https://doi.org/10.66556/2786-586X.54.predmestnikov-o
20. Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 28901/95, European Court of Human Rights. (2000).
21. Stoykova, R. (2023). The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, Article 105801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clsr.2023.105801
22. SWGDE. (2018). Best practices for digital evidence collection. Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence. https://www.swgde.org/documents/published-complete-list- ing/18-f-002-best-practices-for-digital-evidence-collection/
23. UNODC. (n.d.). Digital evidence / Handling of digital evidence. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-6/key-issues/han- dling-of-digital-evidence.html