GLOBAL EXPERIENCE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Jun 7, 2018
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-62-67

  Valentyn Halunko

  Andriy Ivanyshchuk

  Tereziia Popovych

Abstract

The purpose of the article – to reveal features of the implementation of social entrepreneurship in the world. Methodology. The theoretical and methodological framework of scientific developments consists of the research of scientists of modern times who work on the solution to development issues of social entrepreneurship in countries of the world, research data of consulting institutes, own research results. In order to provide validity of research results, the following methods are used: generalization – in the critical analysis of the content of works of scientists on solving the problems of the development of social entrepreneurship; information-logical analysis – when studying data of international consulting institutes and associations; comparison – when comparing directions of the state support for the development of social entrepreneurship in different countries of the world; cause and effect relationship – for obtaining final conclusions. Results. This article reveals optimal conditions for developing social entrepreneurship in countries of the world. A portrait of a successful entrepreneur of the world is formed. The state of social entrepreneurship and the directions of its development in advanced countries of Europe, America, and Asia are analysed. Possibilities of adaptation of the global experience in the social entrepreneurship development for Ukraine are determined. Practical importance. Results of this research can be useful for the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine, the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine. Value/originality – there are clarified conditions and strategic measures on the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Further research should be aimed at the improvement of stimulating mechanisms for the social entrepreneurship development as a global tool for solving problems of the socio-economic development of countries of the world.

How to Cite

Halunko, V., Ivanyshchuk, A., & Popovych, T. (2018). GLOBAL EXPERIENCE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-62-67
Article views: 805 | PDF Downloads: 773

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Social enterprise, social entrepreneurship, conditions of social entrepreneurship development, state support, Europe, America, Asia

References

Baskaran, Pr. (2018). Respect the Hustle: Necessity Entrepreneurship, Returning Citizens, and Social Enterprise Strategies (March 20, 2018), 78 Md. L. Rev. (2019 Forthcoming). Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144791 (accessed March 20, 2018).

Batchenko, L. аnd Dielini, M. (2017). International aspects of state regulation of socio-economic responsibility of entrepreneurship: experience for Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 3. No 5. P. 13-18.

Cagney, P. (2018). Global Best Practices for CSO, NGO, and Other Nonprofit Boards: Lessons From Around the World, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 304 р.

Chowdhury, I. (2015). Resilience and Social Enterprise: The Case of Aravind Eye Care System. In J. Ryan (Ed.), Summit on Resilience II: The Next Storm. New York: Pace University, р. 19-26. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3076674.

Deok Soon Hwang, Wonbong Jang, Joon-Shik Park, Shinyang Kim (2017). Social enterprise in South Korea, Social Enterprise Journal, Vol. 13 Issue: 4, pp. 362-375. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2017-0047.

Drayton B. (2011). Collaborative entrepreneurship: how social entrepreneurs can tip the world by working in global teams. Innovations 6.2, р. 35–38.

Forbes Gallery (2012): 30 Under 30: Social Entrepreneurs. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/special-report/2012/30-under-30/30-under-30_social.html.

Hlady‐Rispal, M. and Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the Way in Which Value is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 62-80. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3104236or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12113 (accessed January 2018).

Hoogendoorn, Br., Pennings, E. and Thurik, R. (2010). What Do We Know About Social Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Empirical Research. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2009-044-ORG. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1462018 (accessed January 2010).

Kryvovyazyuk, I. and Haranchevskaya I. (2017). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo ta yoho rol u vyrishenni sotsialnoekonomichnykh konfliktiv (Social Entrepreneurship and its role in solving social-economic conflicts). Protsesne upravlinnia ta korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist pidpryiemnytskykh struktur (Process control and corporate Social responsibility of Entrepreneurship structures). Materialy mizhn. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. (International science-practical internet conference materials). Lutsk: Tower-Print, рр. 163-165 (accessed December 2017).

OECD/EU (2017). Boosting Social Enterprise Development: Good Practice Compendium, OECD Publishing, Paris. 248 р. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268500-en.

Elson, P., Hall, P. and Wamucii P. (2016). Canadian National Social Enterprise. Sector Survey Report. Retrieved from: https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/sites/ccednet-rcdec.ca/files/final-national-report-may-16-2016.pdf.

Poltavskaya, M. (2015). Sotsialnoe predprinimatelstvo kak ideia i kak protsess: vzgliad nekommercheskikh organizatsii (Social Entrepreneurship as an Idea and as a Process: A View of Non-Profit Organizations). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 7: Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia i sotsialnye tekhnologii № 3 (29). pp. 136-150. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3086289 (accessed December 11, 2015).

Saxena, M. (2011). New Dimensions of Sustainability Through Social Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1780848 (accessed March 8, 2011).

SEFORÏS (2016). A first analysis and profiling of social enterprises in Germany prepared by the SEFORÏS research consortium. Country report Germany. Berlin: SEFORÏS. 35 р. Retrieved from: https://www.hertie-school.org/fileadmin/2_Research/2_Research_directory/Research_projects/SEFORIS/Country-Report-DE_EN-FINAL.pdf.

Social Enterprise Alliance (2018). Retrieved from: http://socialenterprisecensus.org/.

Temple, N. and Gregory, D. (2017). The Future of Business: State of Social Enterprise Survey 2017. London: SEUK. 48 р. Retrieved from: https://www.socialenterprise.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=a1051b2c-21a4-461a-896c-aca6701cc441.

Terziev, V., Nichev, N. and Arabska, E. (2017). Analiz na razvitieto na sotsialnoto predpriemachestvo v Balgariya (Analysis of the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in Bulgaria). Jubilee Scientific Conference with International Participation of Theme: «Modern Trends». Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3149034 (accessed May 2017).

Thomson Reuters Foundation (2016). The best countries to be a Social Entrepreneur 2016. Retrieved from: http://poll2016.trust.org/.

Watanabe, T. and Tanaka Y. (2016). Study of social entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems in South East and East Asian countries: country analysis: Republic of Singapore / The Japan Research Institute. Retrieved from: https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/8063/Study-of-Social-Entrepreneurship-and-Innovation-Ecosystems-in-South-East-and-East-Asian-Countries-Country-Analysis-Republic-of-Singapore.pdf?sequence=1.

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Baltic Journal of Economic Studies