Roman Moskalyk

  Liana Moskalyk


The purpose of this article is to explore the theoretical background of the digitalization of the world economy, focusing on the channels of influence of digitalization on economic growth. There is also a discussion of policy priorities to enhance the positive effects and limit the negative effects of digitalization. Systematic and comparative analysis methods were used. The main conclusions are that early research on the impact of digital technology on economic growth has failed to fully explain the sustained correlation between digitalization and productivity, mainly because of the limitations of available statistics in the past. Recent studies largely suggest that digital technology can have a positive impact on productivity through channels such as robotics that increase productivity on assembly lines, autonomous machines and intelligent systems that increase data analysis and operations productivity, automated maintenance scheduling that increases productivity by reducing downtime due to breakdowns, 3-D printing technology that increases productivity through rapid production of parts, reducing the supply chain, innovative materials that reduce costs and processing time, informatics that reduce costs and reanalysis time. It is argued that, in reality, these channels may have much less impact on productivity than their potential, due to a number of market characteristics and policy constraints. The phenomenon of the digital divide includes unequal income distribution, unequal access to technology, and risks of increased unemployment, etc. Thus, effective, comprehensive policies to promote digitalization at various levels can have an important impact on the economic and social goals of the nation. Recommendations are given to solve the problem of the "digital divide" as follows: improving skills and technical knowledge, providing high-speed Internet in rural and remote areas, redistribution of labor and capital, competition policy tools in case of a large influence of platform business on markets, reducing financial constraints for young innovative firms and start-ups, transition to public digital services, digital-friendly policy for the elderly population.

How to Cite

Moskalyk, R., & Moskalyk, L. (2021). DIGITALIZATION OF THE WORLD ECONOMY: THEORETICAL AND POLITICAL ASPECTS. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal, 2(3), 20-26.
Article views: 65 | PDF Downloads: 71



digitalization, digital economy, digital technology, economic growth, productivity, policy


Andrews, D., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2018). Digital technology diffusion: a matter of capabilities, incentives or both? OECD Economics Department Working Papers. No. 1476. Available at:

Barua, A., Mani, D., & Mukherjee, R. (2013). Impacts of effective data on business innovation and growth. Chapter Two of a three-part study, University of Texas at Austin.

Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Kim, H. H. (2011). Strength in Numbers: How Does Data-Driven Decision making Affect Firm Performance? Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 22 April. Available at:

Colecchia, A., & Schreyer, P. (2002). The Contribution of Information and Communication Technologies to Economic Growth in Nine OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies, 1, 153–171. Available at:

Daveri, F. (2002). The New Economy in Europe 1992-2001. Discussion Paper No. 70, WIDER, United Nation University.

Evans, P. C., & Anninziata, M. (2012). Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries of Minds and Machines. General Electrics. Available at:

Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. & others (2015). Citigroup-Oxford Martin School Technology at Work: The Future of Innovation and Employment. Available at:

Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., Renault, T., Sorbe, S., & Timiliotis, C. (2019). Digitalisation and productivity: In search of the holy grail – Firm-level empirical evidence from EU countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1533. Available at:

Gordon, R. J. (2004). Five puzzles in the Behavior of Productivity, Investment, and Innovation”, Working Paper No. w10 660, National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at:

Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). IT and the U.S. Economy. American Economic Review, March, Vol. 91, No. 1, 2001. P. 1–32.

Jorgenson, D. W. (2003). Information Technology and the G7 Economies. World Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4. P. 139–169.

Moskalyk, R., & Moskalyk, L. (2014). Determinants Of Productivity Growth In Developing Countries: What Really Matters? Herald of the Lviv University. Series International Relations. Issue 36. Part 1. P. 3–14. Available at:

OECD (2019). Digitalization and Productivity: Story of Complementarities. OECD Economic Outlook. Volume 2019, Issue 1. Available at:

OECD (2017). Key issues for digital transformation in the G20. Report prepared for a joint G20 German Presidency. OECD conference. Berlin, Germany 12 January 2017. Available at:

Pilat, D. (2004). The ICT Productivity Paradox: Insights from Micro Data. OECD Economic Studies, Vol. No. 1. P. 37–65. Available at:

Pilat, D., & Nolan, A. (2016). Benefiting from the next production revolution / in Patrick Love (ed.), Debate the Issues: New Approaches to Economic Challenges, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI:

Rivares, A. B., Gal, P., Millot, V. & Sorbe, S. (2019). Like it or not? The impact of online platforms on the productivity of incumbent service providers. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 21 May. Available at:

Schreyer, P. (2000). The Contribution of Information and Communication Technology to Output Growth: A Study of the G7 Countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 02, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI:

Solow, R. (1987). "We'd better watch out", New York Times Book Review, July 12, P. 36.

Sorbe, S., Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2019). Digital Dividend: Policies to Harness the Productivity Potential of Digital Technologies. OECD Economic Policy Paper, February, No. 26. Available at:

Van Ark B. et al. (2002). ICT Investment and Growth Accounts for the European Union, 1980-2000 // Final Report on ICT and Growth Accounting for the DG Economics and Finance of the European Commission, Brussels, 2002.