IMPACT OF DIGITALISATION ON PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN EU MEMBER STATES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Recent economic studies on the relationship between digitalisation and economic growth show some ambiguity in the results due to the use of different methods, measures, country samples and time periods. The purpose of this article is to theoretically substantiate, build and econometrically test the model of the impact of digitalisation and other important factors on the growth of total factor productivity in the countries of the European Union for the period of recent years for which data are available. Methodology. The regression analysis of panel data with fixed effects was conducted. The regression estimation of the model is done for 27 EU countries and the entire European Union for the available periods 2017-2022. The robustness of the model to the choice of alternative regression methods, heterogeneity, autocorrelation and random effects is also tested. The model is based on the principles of the endogenous growth theory. The author substantiates and models the relationship of productivity growth with digitalisation, exports, imports, use of intellectual property rights, research and development, foreign investment, human capital and institutions; calculates the indicator of total factor productivity (TFP) based on the Cobb-Douglas function; the European Commission's Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) is chosen as a measure of digitalisation. Regression results. It is proved that digitalisation is an important factor in productivity growth in the countries of the EU sample, which has a positive and significant impact on total factor productivity (a 1% increase in the digitalisation index leads to an increase in TFP by about 0.1%). Trade openness (exports and imports) was confirmed to remain a key factor affecting productivity. Income from the use of intellectual property rights has a positive, statistically significant impact on TFP growth, although the magnitude of this impact is rather small compared to the impact of digitalisation and trade. It has been found that the quality of institutions can be important for productivity growth, which is an argument for relevant reforms at the level of the government and local communities. The impact of research and development, foreign direct investment, and human capital on TFP growth is difficult to interpret due to the lack of statistical significance of these parameters, which requires further research.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
economic growth, productivity, total factor productivity, digitalisation, Digital Economy and Societies Index (DESI), European Union, regression analysis
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and Digitalization: the Great Acceleration. Journal of Business Research, vol. 136, pp. 602–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011
Bayoumi, T., Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1999). R&D Spillovers and Global Growth. Journal of International Economics, vol. 47(2), pp. 399–428. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v47y1999i2p399-428.html
Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, vol. 39(5), pp. 859–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E
Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal, vol. 107, pp. 134–149. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08104.pdf
Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., & Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the Digital Economy for Developing Countries. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 334, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at: https://one.oecd.org/document/DEV/DOC/WKP(2016)6/En/pdf
Daveri, F. (2003). Information Technology and Productivity Growth Across Countries and Sectors. IGIER, Working paper no. 227. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=371583
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, Trade, and Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 50(1), pp. 133–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4
EU Digital Agenda Data (2023). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Available at: https://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/desi#download
EU4DigitalUA (2022). Building the DESI Ecosystem in Ukraine. 23.11.22. Available at: https://eu4digitalua.eu/en/news/building-the-desi-ecosystem-in-ukraine/
Falvey, R., Foster, N. & Memedovic, O. (2006). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Technology Transfer and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence. Working Paper, Vienna: UNIDO, 80 p. Available at: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2009-04/Role_of_intellectual_property_rights_in_technology_transfer_and_economic_growth_0.pdf
Glaesar, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9(3), pp. 271–303. Available at: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/do_institutions_cause_growth.pdf
Heritage Foundation (2023). Index of Economic Freedom. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/index/download
Hulten, C. (2001). Total Factor Productivity: A Short Biography. NBER working paper, no. 7471, 53 p. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c10122/c10122.pdf
Katz, R. (2017). Social and Economic Impact of Digital Transformation on the Economy. GSR-17 Discussion paper. Geneva: ITU. Available at: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Conferences/GSR/Documents/GSR2017/Soc_Eco_impact_Digital_transformation_finalGSR.pdf
Keller, W. (2004). International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 42(3), pp. 752–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177685
Lucas, R. J. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22(1), pp. 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Moskalyk, R., & Moskalyk, L. (2021). Digitalization of the World Economy: Theoretical and Political Aspects. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal, vol. 2(3), pp. 20–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2021-3-4
Moskalyk, R., & Moskalyk, L. (2014). Determinants of Productivity Growth in Developing Countries: What Really Matters? Journal of the Lviv University. Series International Relations, vol. 36(1), pp. 3–14. Available at: https://intrel.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/VLNU_Mv_2014_361__3.pdf
Rivares, A. В., Gal, P., Millot, V., & Sorbe, S. (2019). Like It or Not? The Impact of Online Platforms on the Productivity of Incumbent Service Providers. OECD Working paper no. 1548, 21 May, 59 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/080a17ce-en
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9(2), pp. 131–165.
van Ark B. (2016). The Productivity Paradox of the New Digital Economy. International Productivity Monitor, vol. 31, pp. 3–18. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v31y20161.html
Vu, M. K. (2011). ICT as a Source of Economic Growth in the Information Age: Empirical Evidence from the 1996–2005 Period. Telecomm Policy, vol. 35, pp. 357–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.008
World Development Indicators (2023). World Bank. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.