THE DUAL ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AND TECH DIPLOMACY: GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative force in contemporary diplomacy, fulfilling a dual role as both an operational tool and a central subject of international discourse. On the one hand, AI serves as a powerful instrument within digital diplomacy, enabling states and international organizations to enhance the efficiency, scope, and agility of their diplomatic operations. On the other hand, as the focus of tech diplomacy, AI has become a key topic in international negotiations and norm-setting, shaping the global governance landscape. This study aims to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework for analyzing the dynamic intersection between diplomatic practice and AI, with a particular emphasis on how technological innovation is reconfiguring international policy, governance mechanisms, and patterns of global economic growth. Through a comparative theoretical analysis, this research investigates the multifaceted impact of AI on diplomatic communication, conflict prevention, and global coordination. It further explores how AI influences the evolution of international norms, the design of institutional structures, and the dynamics of geopolitical competition. In the context of digital diplomacy, AI-driven tools such as chatbots for consular assistance, predictive analytics for real-time crisis monitoring, and advanced disinformation detection systems—exemplified by Ukraine’s Osavul and NATO’s digital initiatives—significantly enhance the speed, reach, and responsiveness of diplomatic activities. These innovations not only streamline traditional diplomatic processes but also create new opportunities for creative statecraft and international engagement. Conversely, in the domain of tech diplomacy, AI has emerged as a central subject of multilateral negotiations and regulatory discussions. Conceptual frameworks presented in this study underscore AI’s dual function as both a geopolitical lever and a catalyst for international cooperation, necessitating robust regulatory alignment and the establishment of export controls on advanced AI technologies. The study identifies several critical challenges associated with the integration of AI into diplomacy, most notably the urgent need for global consensus on AI governance and the effective management of its strategic risks. The complexity of these challenges is compounded by the rapid pace of technological development and the divergent interests of state and non-state actors. In response, public-private partnerships (PPPs) are emerging as vital enablers, fostering collaboration across sectors, bridging knowledge gaps, and mobilizing resources for the responsible and inclusive development of AI on a global scale. PPPs play a crucial role in advancing standardization, policy harmonization, and the equitable distribution of AI benefits, thereby reinforcing the capacity of states and international organizations to address emerging challenges. Ultimately, AI is not only redefining the functions and practices of diplomacy but also transforming the broader landscape of international relations. By necessitating new frameworks for cooperation, regulation, and ethical oversight, AI is reshaping the foundations of global order and stability. The findings of this study highlight the strategic importance of aligning AI development with core values of global stability, equity, and shared prosperity. As AI continues to evolve, diplomatic efforts must adapt to ensure that technological progress serves the collective interests of the international community, fostering a future in which AI-driven diplomacy contributes to peace, security, and sustainable development.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Artificial Intelligence (AI), cooperation, digital diplomacy, emerging technologies, international relations, global economics and governance, geopolitics, tech diplomacy
AI Action Summit Paris, 6–11 February 2025 (2025). Élysée. Available at: https://www.elysee.fr/admin/upload/default/0001/17/786758b38da7b4c16f26dc56e51884b3346684aa.pdf
Allen, G. C., & Goldston, I. (2025). Understanding U.S. allies’ current legal authority to implement AI and semiconductor export controls. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-us-allies-current-legal-authority-implement-ai-and-semiconductor-export
Amaresh, P. (2020, May 13). Artificial intelligence: A new driving horse in international relations and diplomacy. The Diplomatist. Available at: https://diplomatist.com/2020/05/13/artificial-intelligence-a-new-driving-horse-in-internationalrelations-and-diplomacy/
Artificial Intelligence Act. (2024). Brazil AI Act. Available at: https://artificialintelligenceact.com/brazil-ai-act/
Artificial Intelligence Act. (2024, February 27). High-level summary of the AI Act. Future of Life Institute. Available at: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
Baele, S. J., Bukhari, I., & Whyte, C. (2024). AI IR: Charting international relations in the age of artificial intelligence. International Studies Review, 26(2), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viae013
Balme, S. (2025, May 15). Evolving paradigms in science and tech diplomacy. Global Challenges. Available at: https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/17/evolving-paradigms-in-science-and-tech-diplomacy/
Bhatt, C., & Bharadwaj, T. (2024). Understanding the global debate on lethal autonomous weapons systems: An Indian perspective. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/08/understanding-the-global-debate-on-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems-an-indian-perspective?lang=en
Ndzendze, B., & Marwala, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence and international relations (pp. 33–54). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4877-0_3
Brasioli, F., Guercio, M., Gnerre, M., Landini, F., & de Giorgio, A. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of artificial intelligence and international relations. Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Artificial-Intelligence-and-International-Relations/Brasioli-Guercio-Gnerre-Landini-deGiorgio/p/book/9781032850139
Bureau, Online, & ET TravelWorld. (2025, April 22). BLS International launches AI-powered voicebot for visa assistance in Canada. ETTravelWorld.com. Available at: https://travel.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/technology/bls-international-launches-ai-powered-voicebot-for-visa-assistance-in-canada/120516932
Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
United States Department of State. (2024, December 16). Department of State AI Inventory 2024. Available at: https://2021-2025.state.gov/department-of-state-ai-inventory-2024/
European External Action Service. Digital diplomacy | EEAS website. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/digital-diplomacy_en
DiploFoundation. (2021). Digital diplomacy in 2021: What is? How to develop? Where to learn more? Available at: https://www.diplomacy.edu/topics/digital-diplomacy/
European Commission. (2021). Digital programme | Shaping Europe’s digital future. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/digital-programme
European Commission. (2021). Horizon Europe. Available at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en
European Commission. (2025). EU launches InvestAI initiative to mobilise €200 billion of investment in artificial intelligence. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/eu-launches-investai-initiative-mobilise-eu200-billion-investment-artificial-intelligence
European Parliament. (2024, September 4). Foreign interference: How Parliament is fighting the threat to EU democracy. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20240404STO20215/foreign-interference-how-parliament-is-fighting-the-threat-to-eu-democracy
Fedasiuk, R., & Kania, E. (2022). Silicon twist: Managing the Chinese military’s access to AI chips. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). Available at: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-Report-on-a-Page-Silicon-Twist-2.pdf
European Commission. (2025). Futurium | EU–US Trade and Technology Council – EU–US Trade and Technology Dialogue. Available at: https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/EU-US-TTC/pages/eu-us-trade-and-technology-dialogue
Future of Life Institute. (2025, March 11). AI safety summits. Available at: https://futureoflife.org/project/ai-safety-summits
Garrido Rebolledo, V. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on international relations: Towards a global algorithms governance. Rey Juan Carlos University. Available at: https://www.unisci.es/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/UNISCIDP67-1GARRIDO.pdf
Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence. (2024). GPAI. Available at: https://gpai.ai/
Mostafaei, H., et al. (2025). Applications of artificial intelligence in global diplomacy: A review of research and practical models. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100486
Hardy, A. (2024, July 22). Estonia’s digital diplomacy: Nordic interoperability and the challenges of cross-border e-governance. Internet Policy Review, 13(3). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/estonias-digital-diplomacy-nordic-interoperability
Höne, K. (2018). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. Diplo Resource. Available at: https://www.diplomacy.edu/resource/mapping-the-challenges-and-opportunities-of-artificial-intelligence-for-the-conduct-of-diplomacy/
Immigration News Canada. (2021, August 17). INC - Immigration News Canada. Available at: https://immigrationnewscanada.ca/about-us/
Kania, E., & Fedasiuk, R. (2021). Harnessed lightning: How the Chinese military is adopting artificial intelligence. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). Available at: https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/harnessed-lightning/
Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. (2021, February 4). Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, 1–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp146
Krzyzanowski, M. (2020). Digital diplomacy or political communication? Exploring social media in the EU institutions from a critical discourse perspective. In Digital diplomacy and international organisations: Autonomy, legitimacy and contestation (pp. 52–73).
Lee, A., et al. (2023, July 19). Barriers to regulating AI: Critical observations from a fractured field. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372462023_Barriers_to_Regulating_AI_Critical_Observations_from_a_Fractured_Field
United Nations. (2025). Lethal autonomous weapons systems report of the Secretary-General. Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/a/79/88
Lilyanova, V. (2024). Briefing Next Generation EU (NGEU) delivery – sectoral focus. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2024/762288/EPRS_BRI(2024)762288_EN.pdf
Thunø, M., & Nielbo, K. L. (2023, March 29). The initial digitalization of Chinese diplomacy (2019–2021): Establishing global communication networks on Twitter. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2195811
Milmo, D. (2025, February 14). Global disunity, energy concerns and the shadow of Musk: Key takeaways from the Paris AI Summit. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/14/global-disunity-energy-concerns-and-the-shadow-of-musk-key-takeaways-from-the-paris-ai-summit
National Institute for Strategic Studies. (2025, April 28). AI frontiers: Innovations, breakthroughs, challenges. Available at: https://niss.gov.ua/en/news/statti/ai-frontiers-innovations-breakthroughs-challenges
NATO. (2025). NATO’s approach to counter information threats. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/topics_219728.htm?selectedLocale=en
UK Government. (2023). NOT a statement of government policy: Future risks of frontier AI. Technology & Science Insights and Foresight. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/653bc393d10f3500139a6ac5/future-risks-of-frontier-ai-annex-a.pdf
OECD. (2024). AI principles. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html
OECD. (2025). OECD legal instruments. Available at: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449#mainText
Osavul.cloud. (2025). All about Osavul company: History and success story. Available at: https://www.osavul.cloud/about-us
European Parliament. (2023, June). Parliament’s negotiating position on the Artificial Intelligence Act. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/747926/EPRS_ATA(2023)747926_EN.pdf
Pasupuleti, M. K. (2025, February 6). AI’s role in global stability, diplomacy, and peacebuilding. AI-Powered Diplomacy and Conflict Resolutions, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62311/nesx/32268
Ravi, V. S. (2025, February 19). The dawn of AI governance in Singapore by 2075. Linkedin.com. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/singapore-2075-first-ai-powered-nation-state-ravi-vs-wnatc
Russo, L., & Oder, N. (2023, October 31). How countries are implementing the OECD principles for trustworthy AI. OECD.AI. Available at: https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/national-policies-2
Schindler, M., et al. (2021, June). Technological progress, artificial intelligence, and inclusive growth. IMF Working Papers, 2021(166), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583280.001
UK Government. (2024). Seoul ministerial statement for advancing AI safety, innovation and inclusivity: AI Seoul Summit 2024. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/seoul-ministerial-statement-for-advancing-ai-safety-innovation-and-inclusivity-ai-seoul-summit-2024/seoul-ministerial-statement-for-advancing-ai-safety-innovation-and-inclusivity-ai-seoul-summit-2024
Sharma, R. (2024, November 19). How public-private partnerships can ensure AI for good. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/public-private-partnerships-ensure-ethical-sustainable-inclusive-ai-development/
Skelton, S. K. (2025). AI Action Summit review: Differing views cast doubt on AI’s ability to benefit whole of society. ComputerWeekly.com. Available at: https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366620444/AI-Action-Summit-review-Differing-views-cast-doubt-on-AIs-ability-to-benefit-whole-of-society
Sobchuk, M. (2024, February 12). How Ukraine uses AI to fight Russian information operations. GlobalGovernance.eu. Available at: https://www.globalgovernance.eu/publications/how-ukraine-uses-ai-to-fight-russian-information-operations
ASML. (2023, September 1). Statement regarding export control regulations Dutch government. Available at: https://www.asml.com/en/news/press-releases/2023/statement-regarding-export-control-regulations-dutch-government
Subramani, K. (2025, January 13). GDPR vs. data privacy laws in the U.S.: Key differences. Ampcus Cyber. Available at: https://www.ampcuscyber.com/blogs/gdpr-vs-
Tatsuno, D. (2025, May 27). Japan’s AI bill advances toward enactment. Connect on Tech. Available at: https://connectontech.bakermckenzie.com/japans-ai-bill-advances-toward-enactment/
Tiwari, A. (2025, February 25). Paris AI Summit 2025 | India’s World. Indiasworld.in. Available at: https://indiasworld.in/paris-ai-summit-2025/
European Commission. (2022, December 2). TTC joint roadmap for trustworthy AI and risk management. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ttc-joint-roadmap-trustworthy-ai-and-risk-management
Uacrisis.org. (2023, November 24). Deepfakes: AI in the hands of propaganda. Available at: https://uacrisis.org/en/deepfakes-ai-in-the-hands-of-propaganda
Uekert, R. (2025, January 14). The geopolitics of AI dominance: Stunning facts on competing for supremacy. The Inclusive AI. Available at: https://theinclusiveai.com/geopolitics-of-ai-dominance-global-race/
UK Government. (2023, November 1). The Bletchley Declaration by countries attending the AI Safety Summit, 1–2 November 2023. GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration/the-bletchley-declaration-by-countries-attending-the-ai-safety-summit-1-2-november-2023
United Nations. (2020). The impact of digital technologies. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/un75/impact-digital-technologies
Medium. (2025, January 17). Understanding AI-powered, AI-enabled, AI-driven, and AI-assisted: A breakdown. Available at: https://medium.com/@t79877005/understanding-ai-powered-ai-enabled-ai-driven-and-ai-assisted-a-breakdown-be87b2ccd6f8
West, D. M. (2025, April 15). How AI can enable public surveillance. Brookings. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-ai-can-enable-public-surveillance/
Wolford, B. (2025). What is GDPR, the EU’s new data protection law? GDPR.eu. Available at: https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.