THE IMPROVEMENT OF DYNAMIC COMMUNICATIONS IN A COMPLEMENTARY SYSTEM FOR MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Oleh Buzun

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate approaches to the principles of improving dynamic communication in a complementary system of development management of self-governing territory (SGT). Problem statement (the description of the problem being analyzed in general and its relevance to important scientific or practical tasks). At the present stage of socio-economic and decentralization reforms in Ukraine, the formation of the effective development models of all SGTs (on regional, sub-regional and local levels) becomes a strategic and priority task of all institutions of power. At the same time, the issues of optimization of the complementary management system for the development of SGTs have not yet been the subject of special research, which necessitates the preparation of this publication. The methodological principles of the complex mechanism of the formation of a new model of SGTs development are offered on the basis of providing cooperation in the processes of integrated development. It is stated that our model of SGT is a coherent system, which correlates governance at the state, regional, sub-regional and local levels through different types of connections. The content of each type of connection at different levels of public administration is revealed. The results of the research prove that the effective functioning of the proposed model is possible under the condition of management relations improvement; the observance of the development process properties and the coordination of the subjects of influence in the process of prospect formation of the SGT. Practical implications are that co-operation and an integrated approach in the development of SGTs in Ukraine will allow to save industrial and social infrastructure, to prevent outflow of highly qualified personnel from the communities, will provide comprehensive support to the domestic producer and social protection of the population. Co-operation is able to provide an impetus for the development of small businesses and enterprises, and to improve the well-being of the individual family and the entire community in general. The research has its value and originality. It is that SGTs should be dominant in the Ukrainian reform. The issue of scientific and methodological substantiation and building of an effective system of development of self-governing communities on the basis of solving the problematic issues of modernization acceleration, the activation of innovations, the ensuring of cooperation and the integrated development is extremely urgent and determines the priority for improvement of the current management system.

How to Cite

Buzun, O. (2020). THE IMPROVEMENT OF DYNAMIC COMMUNICATIONS IN A COMPLEMENTARY SYSTEM FOR MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES. Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal, 1(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2020-1-2
Article views: 40 | PDF Downloads: 27

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

self-governing territories(SGTs), local self-government, regional policy, territorial communities, the system for managing the development

References

Andrienko, M. V., & Shako, V. S. (2017). Mekhanizmy diyalnosti ekolohichnoyi polityky na rehionalnomu rivni [Mechanisms of implementation of state environmental policy at the regional level]. Derzhavne upravlinnya. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta informatsiya [State Administration. Investments: Practice and Experience] (electronic journal), no. 18, pp. 47–53. Retrieved from: http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/18_2017/11.pdf (accessed February 24, 2020).

Babak, A. (2019). Obyednannya hromad maye pidvyshchyty yikh spromozhnist do rozvytku [Community integration should increase their capacity for development]. Uryadovyy portal [Government portal]. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/obyednannya-gromad-maye-pidvishchiti-yih-spromozhnist-do-rozvitku-alona-babak (accessed February 24, 2020).

Bryl, M., Vrublevsky, O., Dancheva, O., Seitosmanov, A., & Chubarov, E. (2018). Uspishna terytorialʹna hromada: buduyemo razom [Successful Territorial Community: Building Together]. Kharkiv: Factor Publishing House. Retrieved from: http://despro.org.ua/library/publication/UspishnaTerytorialna Hromada2018.pdf (accessed February 24, 2020).

International Alert (2017). Detsentralizatsiya v Ukrayini dosyahnennya, nadiyi i poboyuvannya [Decentralization in Ukraine of achievement, hope and fear] (electronic journal). Retrieved from: https://www.international-alert.org/sites/default/files/Ukraine_Decentralisation_UK_2017.pdf (accessed February 24, 2020).

Makhnacheva, N. M. (2016). Sotsialʹna mobilizatsiya ta resursnyy potentsial hromady [Social mobilization and community resource potential]. Efektyvna ekonomika [Effective Economy], no. 10. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5175 (accessed February 24, 2020).

Official Bulletin of Ukraine (2015). Yevropeysʹka khartiya mistsevoho samovryaduvannya [European Charter of Local Self-Government], no. 24, p. 450, art. 718.

Pohorilko, V. F. (2001). Munitsypalne pravo Ukrayiny [Municipal Law of Ukraine]. Kiev: Jurincom Inter. (in Ukrainian)

Syla, T. I. (2013). Sotsialʹna robota dlya staloho rozvytku: v poshukakh spilʹnykh vektoriv [Social work for sustainable development: in search of common vectors]. Problemy sotsialʹnoyi roboty [Problems of social work], no. 2(3), pp. 74–84.

Vasylchenko, G., Parasiuk, I., & Yeremenko, N. (2015). Planuvannya rozvytku terytorialʹnykh hromad [The planning for the development of territorial communities]. Kyiv: "VNA enterprise". (in Ukrainian)