MONOPOLIZATION OF THE INFORMATION MARKET BY DIGITAL PLATFORMS: LEGAL AND ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS FOR MEDIA PLURALISM
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This article examines the legal and economic implications of the monopolization of the information market by digital platforms for the protection of media pluralism. In the contemporary digital environment, global technology companies increasingly act as key intermediaries between producers of informational content, audiences, and advertisers. This transformation of the media market is accompanied by the concentration of advertising revenues, the strengthening of algorithmic control over the distribution of information, and the emergence of new forms of economic dependence of journalism on platform infrastructures. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of the economic dominance of digital platforms on media pluralism and to identify legal mechanisms capable of ensuring the balanced development of media systems in the context of digital transformation. The research employs an interdisciplinary approach that combines methods of legal analysis, media economics, and contemporary media studies. The study explores theoretical approaches to understanding media pluralism as a key prerequisite for a democratic information environment. Particular attention is paid to the transformation of classical concepts of pluralism in the context of the platformization of media, characterized by the growing role of digital platforms in shaping information flows and redistributing advertising resources. The article analyses the economic mechanisms of platform markets, including the two-sided model of interaction between audiences and advertisers, which contributes to the concentration of market power in the hands of the largest technology companies. A separate part of the study focuses on the analysis of algorithmic governance of information flows and its impact on the accessibility of journalistic content. It is demonstrated that algorithmic systems of recommendation and moderation effectively perform a gatekeeping function, determining the visibility of media content within the digital environment. The article also examines contemporary legal mechanisms for regulating the activities of digital platforms. In particular, it analyses the regulatory framework of the European Union, including the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and the European Media Freedom Act, which collectively shape a new model for regulating the digital information space. The prospects for adapting these approaches within the national legislation of Ukraine are also considered. The study concludes that safeguarding media pluralism in the context of the growing dominance of digital platforms requires a comprehensive approach that combines instruments of competition law, media regulation, and economic support for journalism. An important direction for further development lies in the harmonization of national policies with European standards for regulating digital platforms and in the creation of sustainable economic models for the functioning of media systems.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
media pluralism, digital platforms, information market, algorithmic governance, media law, economics of journalism
Brogi, E. (2020). The media pluralism monitor: Conceptualizing media pluralism for the online environment. Profesional de la Información, 29(5), e290529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.29
Cable. (2025, August 19). Digital marketing statistics in Europe 2025. Available at: https://blog.cable.so/2025/08/19/digital-marketing-statistics-in-europe-2025/
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004
European Union. (2016). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C202, 389–405. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2016/oj
European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj
European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj
European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022R2065
European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market (European Media Freedom Act). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1083/oj
Hudz, O. Y., & Petkun, S. M. (2023). Formation of a new media reality in the context of digital transformations. Visnyk of Kherson National Technical University, 4(87), 339–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2023.4.42
Keskin, B. (2018). Review of The Platform Society: Public values in a connective world by J. van Dijck, T. Poell, & M. de Waal. Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 3(3), Article 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2018-03-03-08
Madison and Wall. (2023, November 21). In Europe, Google, Meta and digital platforms gain share of wallet vs. TV advertising, as in US. Available at: https://madisonandwall.substack.com/p/in-europe-google-meta-and-digital
Napoli, P. M. (2019). Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/napo18454
Parcu, P. L. (2019, March 19). New digital threats to media pluralism in the information age. Florence School of Regulation. Available at: https://fsr.eui.eu/parcu-p-l-new-digital-threats-to-media-pluralism-in-the-information-age
Reporters Without Borders. (n.d.). Media ownership monitor: Ukrainian media prone to power plays more than ever. Available at: https://rsf.org/en/media-ownership-monitor-ukrainian-media-prone-power-plays-more-ever
Shpurik, A. (2023, December 6). Will they see it or not? How algorithms influence media work: The experience of different platforms. MediaMaker. Available at: https://mediamaker.me/pobachat-chy-ne-pobachat-yak-algorytmy-vplyvayut-na-robotu-media-dosvid-riznyh-platform-6372/
Solomakha, A. (2025, September 9). Media registration in Ukraine: Differentiation between online media and audiovisual services. Detector Media. Available at: https://detector.media/infospace/article/243985/2025-09-09-reiestratsiya-media-v-ukraini-rozmezhuvannya-onlayn-media-y-audiovizualnykh-servisiv/
Sukhorukova, O., Grygorova, Z., & Kvasko, A. (2023). Development trends of the domestic media industry. Problems of Systemic Approach in the Economy, 2(91), 94–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2023-2-12
Ukraine. (2023). Law of Ukraine “On Media” No. 2849-IX of December 13, 2022. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 47–50, Art. 120. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2849-20

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.